Abstract:Objective:To analyse the clinical efficacy and outcome of early abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).Methods:The clinical data of 107 SAP patients with massive abdominal fluid in Shanghai General People Hospital from May 2017 to December 2021 were collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into APD group ( n=56) and NO-APD group ( n=51) according to whether they underwent APD or not within 3 days after admission. The APD group was then divided into abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) subgroup ( n=29) and NO-ACS subgroup ( n=27) according to whether ACS had occurred or not at the time of puncture. Patients' general data, the duration of systemic inflammatory response (SIRS), length of ICU stay, the trends of intra-abdominal pressure and inflammatory indicators (white blood cell count and the content of C-reactive protein) within 1-3 days after admission, incidence of infection complication, step-up therapy, discharge or death were recorded. Results:The intra-abdominal pressure were 18.6±5.6mmHg , 13.7±4.2mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kpa) in APD group and NO-APD group, respectively. The intra-abdominal pressure of APD group was significantly higher than that of NO-APD group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P=0.000). Compared with NO-APD group, the duration of SIRS was significantly shortened in APD group [3(2, 4) days vs 4(3, 6) days, P=0.029]. On day 1, 2 and 3 after admission, the intra-abdominal pressure was 18.6±5.6 mmHg, 16.4±4.7 mmHg and 13.5±3.9 mmHg in APD group, and was 13.7±4.2 mmHg, 12.3±3.6 mmHg and 11.0±2.6 mmHg in NO-APD group, respectively. The intra-abdominal pressure of the APD group dropped faster than the NO-APD group ( P=0.004). The white blood cell count was (14.8±4.8), (10.5±4.5) and (9.0±3.8)×10 9/L in APD group, and was (14.2±5.4), (12.3±7.3), (11.7±5.3)×10 9/L in NO-APD group, respectively. Compared with the NO-APD group, the decrease rate of white blood cell count was faster in APD group ( P=0.006). The C-reactive protein content was (153.6±47.1), (150.4±10.5) and (108.8±49.4)mg/L in APD group, and were (174.8±31.1), (191.6±29.4) and (186.8±45.5)mg/L in NO-APD group . The content of C-reactive protein in APD group decreased significantly, while that in NO-APD group did not decrease. There was a significant difference between the two groups ( P=0.009). In the subgroup comparisons, the duration of SIRS in the ACS subgroup was significant longer than that in the NO-ACS subgroup [4(3, 5) days vs 2(1, 3)days, P=0.000]. Compared between the two groups and two subgroups respectively, there were no statistically significant differences on length of ICU stay, infection complication rate, advanced treatment rate and mortality. Conclusions:For SAP patients with abdominal fluid, APD in the early stage could shorten the duration of SIRS, decrease intra-abdominal pressure rapidly, improve inflammatory indicators, but could not improve the clinical outcome.

Efficacy of Early Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in Acute Pancreatitis of Varying Severity Associated with Sterile Acute Inflammatory Pancreatic Fluid Collection

Does the Efficiency of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Equal in Treating with Acute Peripancreatic Fluid Collection Induced by Acute Pancreatitis with Various Degree of Severity

Intra-Abdominal Pressure Reduction After Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Is a Protective Factor for Severe Pancreatitis Patients With Sterile Fluid Collections

Early Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage in the Treatment of Severe Acute Pancreatitis with Acute Fluid Accumulation

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage in severe acute pancreatitis and selection of application timing

Predictors of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage (PCD) after Abdominal Paracentesis Drainage (APD) in Patients with Moderately Severe or Severe Acute Pancreatitis along with Fluid Collections

The value of percutaneous catheter drainage for severe acute pancreatitis

Percutaneous Catheter Drainage for Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Infective Pancreatic Necrosis: an Analysis of 34 Cases

Percutaneous catheter drainage and negative pressure irrigation for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) patients with infective pancreatic necrosis

Minimally invasive percutaneous catheter drainage versus open laparotomy with temporary closure for treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with early-stage severe acute pancreatitis

Clinical analysis of percutaneous catheter drainage in treating SAP combined with pancreatic necrosis

Abdominal paracentesis drainage improves outcome of acute pancreatitis complicated with intra-abdominal hypertension in early phase

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Drainage May Decrease the Mortality of Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Clinical efficacy and outcome analysis of early abdominal paracentesis drainage for treating patients with severe acute pancreatitis

Early On-Demand Drainage or Standard Management for Acute Pancreatitis Patients with Acute Necrotic Collections and Persistent Organ Failure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Combination of Percutaneous Catheter Drainage with Negative Pressure Irrigation and Endoscopic Drainage for Severe Acute Pancreatitis Patients with Infected Pancreatic Necrosis

Percutaneous Drainage Versus Peritoneal Lavage for Pancreatic Ascites in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Peritoneal Lavage and Drainage in Treatment of Severe Acute Pancreatitis: Analysis of 60 Cases

Percutaneous Catheter Drainage for Infective Pancreatic Necrosis: is It Always the First Choice for All Patients?

Benefits of abdominal paracentesis drainage performed ahead of percutaneous catheter drainage as a modification of the step-up approach in acute pancreatitis with fluid collections

Different timing for abdominal paracentesis catheter placement and drainage in severe acute pancreatitis complicated by intra-abdominal fluid accumulation