Comparison of USPIO-enhanced MRI and Gd-DTPA Enhancement During the Subacute Stage of Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats

Yan Mei Yang,XiaoYuan Feng,Le Kang Yin,Chan,Jie Jia,Zun Guo Du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185113506140
2014-01-01
Acta Radiologica
Abstract:Background Being one class of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents, ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxides (USPIO) bear the potential to study neuroinflammation following stroke, but there is still debate over whether the iron oxides particles may enter the brain tissue passively over a damaged blood–brain barrier (BBB). Purpose To compare the enhancement patterns of USPIO and gadopentate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) during the subacute stage of focal cerebral ischemia, to examine the relationship between USPIO enhancement and BBB disturbance, as well as with neuroinflammatory cell response. Material and Methods Multiple MR sequences were obtained on days 3 and 6 after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion induced in rats with and without the application of USPIO and Gd-DTPA. The enhancement patterns of the two contrast agents were compared and correlated to histology, including IgG for BBB permeability, Prussian Blue staining for iron particle detection, and CD68 immunohistochemistry staining to identify macrophage/microglia. Results Gd-DTPA enhancement depicted BBB breakdown being in line with IgG leakage. The USPIO enhanced images demonstrated both diffuse and focal signal alteration in ischemic lesions. The diffuse enhanced pattern had a similar spatial and temporal profile as with Gd-DTPA enhancement. In addition, focal enhanced signal loss was visible on T1-, T2-, and T2*-weighted images, with a peak tendency of MR signal loss, macrophage/microglia concentration and iron particle accumulation at a later phase of the study. Conclusion After focal cerebral ischemia, Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI showed a higher sensitivity in detecting BBB alterations than did USPIO enhancement. USPIO provided complementary information regarding inflammatory cell activity in neuroinflammatory to cerebral ischemia that had not been visualized using conventional Gd-DTPA. The assessment using multiple MR parameters may identify intracellular and extracellular USPIO in vivo.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?