Abstract:The disappointingly poor outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac resuscitation have prompted researchers to reexamine the priorities of CPR. To the extent that the standards and then guidelines1Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care: III. Adult advanced life support. JAMA 1992; 268:2199-2241.Google Scholar were evolved by consensus through the auspices of the National Research Council and the American Heart Association, the emphasis on the training of both professional and lay persons to intervene early was unquestionably a major advance. On the other hand, CPR also was codified, and this impeded scientific progress. For instance, the ABCs of CPR became essentially inviolate with the implication that all that need be known is known. CPR research thereafter received little public support for the same reason. The perception was that both the rationale and the protocol of interventions were so well established that funding agencies and peer reviewers found little merit in research applications that implied otherwise.A significant number of committed investigators continued to work against the odds in spite of this restraint in funding. They were persuaded that good science was needed and that dogma would inevitably give way to science. This confidence was redeemed. Indeed, the ABCs of cardiac resuscitation are no longer inviolate. There is now almost universal agreement among the experts that the highest priority of CPR is the D, namely, early defibrillation. When defibrillation is unsuccessful, the C, ie, precordial compression, becomes the next priority.3Niemann JT Cairns CB Sharma J et al.Treatment of prolonged ventricular fibrillation: immediate countershock versus high-dose epinephrine and CPR preceding countershock.Circulation. 1992; 85: 281-287Crossref PubMed Scopus (168) Google Scholar Though both the airway and breathing have import, there is compelling experimental proof that precordial compression together with the simple expedient of enriching the inspired oxygen concentration suffices provided that cardiac arrest is not of asphyxial cause. Neither endotracheal intubation nor mechanical ventilation are routinely required during the initial 5 min of CPR, and neither constitutes a priority over immediate defibrillation and otherwise uninterrupted precordial compression. A more appropriate sequence is likely to be that of D, C, B, and A.Because immediate defibrillation became the highest priority, there was a great incentive to make it available to lay rescuers. This prompted the development of “intelligent” defibrillators. Marketed as automated external defibrillators (AEDs), the lay bystander is now increasingly enfranchised to perform defibrillation as part of basic life support CPR.7AHA Task Force. Report of the American Heart Association Task Force on the future of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 1992; 85:2346-55Google ScholarWe acknowledge the importance of AEDs, but we now also recognize the need for even more intensive research including the appropriate operation of AEDs. For instance, The American Heart Association, in its published guidelines, admonishes against temporarily stopping precordial compression except when automated defibrillators are used.1Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care: III. Adult advanced life support. JAMA 1992; 268:2199-2241.Google Scholar This “hands off” interval during the use of AEDs is to allow for automated assessment of the rhythm such as to avoid artifacts produced by precordial compression. The present algorithm therefore allows for substantial time delays for analysis, shock, and in the event of failure, to reestablish a viable rhythm, reanalysis and reshock again for a total of three cycles. Up to 90 precious seconds are therefore consumed for diagnosing ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia and delivering three shocks. Precordial compression is held in abeyance during this interval. Yet experimental evidence in our laboratory indicate that if precordial compression is withheld for an interval of as little as 30 s, without continuing precordial compression, the likelihood of successful defibrillation and survival is remote.8Soto Y Weil MH Sun SJ et al.Time limitations between stopping precordial compression and defibrillation.Crit Care Med. 1996; (in press)Google Scholar Accordingly, there is a great need to reinvestigate this problem.The resolution of this and so many other issues that pertain to CPR is likely to be achieved by assuring careful and objective scientific research rather than consensus in the absence of secure data. Hopefully, these experiences will therefore prompt a reawakening of the need for such research and its funding. After all, it relates to the survival of no fewer than 400,000 victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States alone in each year. The disappointingly poor outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac resuscitation have prompted researchers to reexamine the priorities of CPR. To the extent that the standards and then guidelines1Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care: III. Adult advanced life support. JAMA 1992; 268:2199-2241.Google Scholar were evolved by consensus through the auspices of the National Research Council and the American Heart Association, the emphasis on the training of both professional and lay persons to intervene early was unquestionably a major advance. On the other hand, CPR also was codified, and this impeded scientific progress. For instance, the ABCs of CPR became essentially inviolate with the implication that all that need be known is known. CPR research thereafter received little public support for the same reason. The perception was that both the rationale and the protocol of interventions were so well established that funding agencies and peer reviewers found little merit in research applications that implied otherwise. A significant number of committed investigators continued to work against the odds in spite of this restraint in funding. They were persuaded that good science was needed and that dogma would inevitably give way to science. This confidence was redeemed. Indeed, the ABCs of cardiac resuscitation are no longer inviolate. There is now almost universal agreement among the experts that the highest priority of CPR is the D, namely, early defibrillation. When defibrillation is unsuccessful, the C, ie, precordial compression, becomes the next priority.3Niemann JT Cairns CB Sharma J et al.Treatment of prolonged ventricular fibrillation: immediate countershock versus high-dose epinephrine and CPR preceding countershock.Circulation. 1992; 85: 281-287Crossref PubMed Scopus (168) Google Scholar Though both the airway and breathing have import, there is compelling experimental proof that precordial compression together with the simple expedient of enriching the inspired oxygen concentration suffices provided that cardiac arrest is not of asphyxial cause. Neither endotracheal intubation nor mechanical ventilation are routinely required during the initial 5 min of CPR, and neither constitutes a priority over immediate defibrillation and otherwise uninterrupted precordial compression. A more appropriate sequence is likely to be that of D, C, B, and A. Because immediate defibrillation became the highest priority, there was a great incentive to make it available to lay rescuers. This prompted the development of “intelligent” defibrillators. Marketed as automated external defibrillators (AEDs), the lay bystander is now increasingly enfranchised to perform defibrillation as part of basic life support CPR.7AHA Task Force. Report of the American Heart Association Task Force on the future of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation 1992; 85:2346-55Google Scholar We acknowledge the importance of AEDs, but we now also recognize the need for even more intensive research including the appropriate operation of AEDs. For instance, The American Heart Association, in its published guidelines, admonishes against temporarily stopping precordial compression except when automated defibrillators are used.1Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care: III. Adult advanced life support. JAMA 1992; 268:2199-2241.Google Scholar This “hands off” interval during the use of AEDs is to allow for automated assessment of the rhythm such as to avoid artifacts produced by precordial compression. The present algorithm therefore allows for substantial time delays for analysis, shock, and in the event of failure, to reestablish a viable rhythm, reanalysis and reshock again for a total of three cycles. Up to 90 precious seconds are therefore consumed for diagnosing ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia and delivering three shocks. Precordial compression is held in abeyance during this interval. Yet experimental evidence in our laboratory indicate that if precordial compression is withheld for an interval of as little as 30 s, without continuing precordial compression, the likelihood of successful defibrillation and survival is remote.8Soto Y Weil MH Sun SJ et al.Time limitations between stopping precordial compression and defibrillation.Crit Care Med. 1996; (in press)Google Scholar Accordingly, there is a great need to reinvestigate this problem. The resolution of this and so many other issues that pertain to CPR is likely to be achieved by assuring careful and objective scientific research rather than consensus in the absence of secure data. Hopefully, these experiences will therefore prompt a reawakening of the need for such research and its funding. After all, it relates to the survival of no fewer than 400,000 victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States alone in each year.

Abstract:Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) quality of care for adult and pediatric patients—not simply survival—requires a comprehensive set of programs and actions. Ideally, these should be embedded in a system of care that (1) plans and prepares for IHCA, (2) prevents IHCA when avoidable, (3) delivers high-quality, guideline-based resuscitation, and (4) continuously evaluates and improves itself within a culture of person-centered care. IHCA is a high-risk event among hospitalized patients of all ages worldwide that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.1Andersen L.W. Holmberg M.J. Berg K.M. Donnino M.W. Granfeldt A. In-hospital cardiac arrest: a review.J Am Med Assoc. 2019; 321: 1200-1210https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1696Crossref PubMed Scopus (453) Google Scholar Estimates of its incidence vary across industrialized countries with rates in adults between 1.2 and 10 per 1000 hospital admissions,2Nolan J.P. Soar J. Smith G.B. Gwinnutt C. Parrott F. Power S. Harrison D.A. Nixon E. Rowan K. National Cardiac Arrest Audit. Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit.Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 987-992https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (314) Google Scholar, 3Andersen L.W. Holmberg M.J. Lofgren B. Kirkegaard H. Granfeldt A. Adult in-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark.Resuscitation. 2019; 140: 31-36https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.046Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar, 4Ohbe H. Tagami T. Uda K. Matsui H. Yasunaga H. Incidence and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan 2011–2017: a nationwide inpatient database study.J Intensive Care. 2022; 10: 10https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00601-yCrossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar, 5Holmberg M.J. Ross C.E. Fitzmaurice G.M. Chan P.S. Duval-Arnould J. Grossestreuer A.V. Yankama T. Donnino M.W. Andersen L.W. American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators. Annual incidence of adult and pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019; 12e005580https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005580Crossref PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar which translates to ≈300 000 IHCA events in the United States each year with a reported survival rate to hospital discharge of ≈25%.5Holmberg M.J. Ross C.E. Fitzmaurice G.M. Chan P.S. Duval-Arnould J. Grossestreuer A.V. Yankama T. Donnino M.W. Andersen L.W. American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators. Annual incidence of adult and pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019; 12e005580https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005580Crossref PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar Although experiences outside of higher income countries are limited, reported data suggest high incidence rates of IHCA in low- to middle-income countries like Uganda and China.6Ocen D. Kalungi S. Ejoku J. Luggya T. Wabule A. Tumukunde J. Kwizera A. Prevalence, outcomes and factors associated with adult in hospital cardiac arrests in a low-income country tertiary hospital: a prospective observational study.BMC Emerg Med. 2015; 15: 23https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-015-0047-0Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar, 7Wang C. Zheng W. Zheng J. Shao F. Zhu Y. Li C. Ma Y. Tan H. Yan S. Han X. et al.A national effort to improve outcomes for in-hospital cardiac arrest in China: the Baseline Investigation of Cardiac Arrest (BASIC-IHCA).Resusc Plus. 2022; 11100259https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.10025Crossref Google Scholar These events are medical emergencies that require immediate treatment by teams of interdisciplinary health care professionals to optimize outcomes. Not surprisingly, there is a significant burden on hospitals to create and maintain resuscitation systems that are able to identify IHCA, activate an emergency response, and deliver high-quality resuscitation. Yet despite these pressures, there is consistent evidence that the quality of care around IHCA remains suboptimal and varies across hospitals and countries.8Chan P.S. Nallamothu B.K. Improving outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest: life after death.J Am Med Assoc. 2012; 307: 1917-1918https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.3504Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar, 9Nallamothu B.K. Guetterman T.C. Harrod M. Kellenberg J.E. Lehrich J.L. Kronick S.L. Krein S.L. Iwashyna T.J. Saint S. Chan P.S. How do resuscitation teams at top-performing hospitals for in-hospital cardiac arrest succeed?.A qualitative studyCirculation. 2018; 138: 154-163https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033674Crossref Scopus (92) Google Scholar, 10Penketh J. Nolan J.P. In-hospital cardiac arrest: the state of the art.Crit Care. 2022; 26: 376https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04247-yCrossref PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar. Given the variation in IHCA quality of care and outcomes, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) launched an initiative to provide strategic guidance delineating critical steps to improve IHCA care. The member councils comprising ILCOR are the American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Australian and New Zealand Committee on Resuscitation, Resuscitation Councils of Asia, Indian Resuscitation Council Federation, and the collaborating organization, International Federation of Red Cross. The Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes in this document (Fig. 1; Table 1) is the result of this effort and builds upon prior work in the space of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care by the Global Resuscitation Alliance.11Global Resuscitation Alliance. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://www.globalresuscitationalliance.org/ten-programs/.Google Scholar These steps represent the consensus of a Writing Group of >30 interprofessional experts drawn from various branches of medicine, nursing, and allied health care professions.Table 1Summary of ten steps toward improving in-hospital cardiac arrest quality of care and outcomes.Plan and prepareStep 1: build and support governance and infrastructure for a resuscitation program: create a governance structure with administrative leadership to advance resuscitation excellence. Empower local operational champions and ensure a robust quality improvement program.Step 2: collect data to measure and improve resuscitation processes and outcomes: use data to assess education, training, performance, and outcomes across the continuum of resuscitation care and to devise and evaluate the impact of quality improvement efforts to ensure their sustainability. Consider participating in resuscitation registries to enable benchmarking and contribute to knowledge transfer.Step 3: implement effective education and training for resuscitation: create and maintain resuscitation education and training programs for resuscitation, including (1) standardized, in-person resuscitation courses; (2) low-dose, high-frequency in-situ training; (3) team-based training and simulations; and (4) debriefing to learn from resuscitation events.PreventStep 4: establish patient and family goals of treatment early and reassess often: proactively and collaboratively engage patients and their families in dialogue regarding their preferences for resuscitation in the context of their values, comorbidities, frailty, and family needs. Recognize that there are patients for whom resuscitation is unwanted or unlikely to result in an outcome that is acceptable to the patient. Ideally, goals of treatment conversations would start in the community and be updated on admission and after any change in clinical condition.Step 5: stop preventable IHCA: have systems (eg, early warning systems) and teams (eg, medical/rapid response teams) in place to enable early prediction, identification, and response to deteriorating patients. Provide effective communication to ensure a clear plan and safe transition of care.PerformStep 6: develop and deploy an effective resuscitation response system: make available a hospital-wide resuscitation response system that is easily and rapidly activated. Ensure a high-quality resuscitation team that includes preassigned, experienced, and interdisciplinary health care professionals.Step 7: deliver guideline-based resuscitation care: focus on essential components of guideline-based skills for basic life support, advanced life support, and pediatric life support. These include prompt initiation of high-performance CPR and defibrillation and the use of appropriate and cause-directed interventions. Avoid nonrecommended interventions and early termination of resuscitation.Step 8: deliver guideline-based post–cardiac arrest care: empower multidisciplinary teams to provide guideline-based post–cardiac arrest care, throughout and beyond hospitalization. Use multiple modalities to inform prognostication. Consider organ donation, when appropriate.Principles and cultureStep 9: implement a person-centered culture of excellence in care: ensure there is informed, culturally appropriate communication with patients and family to support them and to understand their goals, values, and preferences. For cardiac arrest survivors, development of postdischarge plans with targeted resources (eg, primary care, rehabilitation) is crucial for recovery and survivorship. For families of nonsurvivors, offer grief and bereavement resources.Step 10: ensure the well-being of health care professionals: there should be a holistic focus on the psychological, physical, and spiritual well-being of health care professionals. Caring for the care team ensures that treatment of IHCA patients remains at a high quality.CPR indicates cardiopulmonary resuscitation; and IHCA, in-hospital cardiac arrest. Open table in a new tab CPR indicates cardiopulmonary resuscitation; and IHCA, in-hospital cardiac arrest. For clarity and mutual understanding, we define IHCA as any infant, pediatric, or adult patient who sustains a cardiac arrest within a hospital setting recognizing that, for some hospitals, this may include surrounding geographic areas on a campus (eg, lobby, parking structures) and nonpatient visitors (we do not address neonatal resuscitation in this document given its distinctive aspects). We appreciate that this decision means there may be heterogeneity in how IHCA is defined by each hospital, as nonpatient visitors are unique from hospitalized patients, and they are likely to sustain a cardiac arrest for different reasons. However, for this document, the Writing Group felt that what is common across IHCA is established systems are needed to care for these critical events. IHCA necessitates immediate and appropriate recognition and intervention, often including immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation, and other guideline-based interventions. We acknowledge that with this definition of IHCA that can occur in any setting within the hospital or its campus, IHCA will be distinct from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in terms of etiology (eg, hypoxia, infection), response, and outcomes.12Hoybye M. Stankovic N. Holmberg M. Christensen H.C. Granfeldt A. Andersen L.W. In-hospital vs out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: patient characteristics and survival.Resuscitation. 2021; 158: 157-165https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.11.016Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar. Members of the Writing Group come from diverse regions across the globe, offering a unique blend of perspectives and experiences from both low- and high-resource settings. These individuals were selected by relying on nominations from ILCOR and other expert groups in resuscitation care from around the world. We tried to balance the membership across nationalities, professions, demographics, and resource settings. To support this Writing Group and ensure a diverse set of voices were heard, we also had an Advisory Board of >30 members who served to provide additional feedback throughout the process. The process for selecting materials to include in this document entailed several rounds of brainstorming, discussion, and refinement to ensure the final steps truly reflect a global, comprehensive, and practical approach to improving IHCA care. Throughout the process, special consideration was placed on low-resource settings and the unique challenges they may face. Although this document reflects expert consensus guidance on best practices and published evidence from ILCOR statements,13Nolan J.P. Maconochie I. Soar J. Olasveengen T.M. Greif R. Wyckoff M.H. Singletary E.M. Aickin R. Berg K.M. Mancini M.E. et al.Executive summary 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations.Resuscitation. 2020; 156: A1-A22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.009Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 14Nolan J.P. Maconochie I. Soar J. Olasveengen T.M. Greif R. Wyckoff M.H. Singletary E.M. Aickin R. Berg K.M. Mancini M.E. et al.Executive summary: 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations.Circulation. 2020; 142: S2-S27https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000890Crossref PubMed Scopus (51) Google Scholar it does not contain a systematic literature review or incorporate a formal grading of evidence. Via a virtual platform, the Writing Group met numerous times over 5 months followed by a 2-day in-person meeting (May 28–29, 2023) in Brisbane, Australia, that included an iterative group discussion format for voting, which resulted in the Ten Steps included in this document. We created several workgroups examining cardiac arrest phases of care (processes of care before, during, and after cardiac arrest), as well as key topic areas of focus (metrics and data, ethics, education, tools and devices, and teams and systems). Independent workgroups completed semistructured reports back to a Steering Committee and the entire Writing Group. Then during the 2-day in-person meeting, we had a series of facilitated discussions to vote on themes that arose from these discussions. We voted over 3 cycles and presented results from the voting (central tendencies, dispersion) to the Writing Group between cycles. At the conclusion of the meeting, we identified the Ten Steps to provide practical guidance for hospitals and health systems that are shared in this document. The Advisory Group was consulted 2 × throughout this process, and at the conclusion, to ensure the steps were relevant, practical, and applicable to a broad population of patients. The goal of this inclusive and consultative process was to create a document that respects diversity, embraces inclusivity, and speaks to the realities of a wide range of health care environments from low- to high-resource settings. Our collective commitment to enhancing IHCA care has been the driving force behind this work, underscoring the essential role of collaboration in addressing complex health challenges. Our intent is not to impose a one-size-fits-all approach; rather, we recognize that local context, considering unique needs, geographic concerns, and available resources, will guide the prioritization and application of the Ten Steps. In other words, the steps are not meant to represent a natural order or a hierarchical sequence for their introduction into a system. Rather, each institution or health system should use these steps to identify the areas of the greatest need in determining which steps they would prioritize to achieve the highest impact on their IHCA care. The goal is to assist hospitals and health systems to establish, support, reinforce, evaluate, and improve their resuscitation systems for IHCA, with the aim of enhancing survival outcomes, ensuring quality care, and fostering a continuous cycle of improvement (Figure). Our goal here is to provide practical guidance to improve IHCA quality of care and outcomes. To implement the Ten Steps in this document effectively, each institution should first conduct a thorough needs assessment of its existing infrastructure, including its teams, protocols, and resources, as well as its outcomes related to IHCA. Based on this appraisal, the institution can then use the suggested steps to identify gaps, set priorities, and create an action plan tailored to its context and resources. Such approaches may involve creating a multidisciplinary team committed to the improvement process, ensuring that the communication lines are open and developing a shared understanding of the objectives. We cannot underscore enough the critical role of champions, resources, and administrative support in implementing these steps—themes that came up frequently during our discussions. Achieving excellence in IHCA care is not simply about applying new techniques or protocols; it involves fostering a culture that values continuous improvement, patient-centered care, and interdisciplinary teamwork. The need for adequate resources, coupled with a strong commitment from the administration, is integral to nurturing such a culture and ensuring sustained improvement. Our guidance in the Ten Steps places a significant emphasis on affordability, availability, and sustainability of IHCA care. Addressing these aspects requires expanding our scope to cover essential areas such as training, education, and postresuscitation care (including beyond hospital discharge). This includes developing innovative, cost-effective solutions and strengthening the human resources through capacity building and continuous training, particularly in low-resource settings. Many insights came after robust discussion among the Writing and Advisory Groups around challenges different hospitals and health care professionals face with IHCA. As a result, this document offers unique perspectives on IHCA care by going beyond the traditional focus on survival outcomes emphasized in guidelines. For instance, addressing emotional needs of families of both survivors and nonsurvivors of IHCA arose as a vital component of comprehensive care that is now embedded in this guidance. Moreover, opening conversations regarding organ donation with family members, when appropriate, arose from our discussions. Lastly, we underscore the necessity of supporting health care professionals involved in these emotionally charged, high-stake situations to ensure their physical and psychological safety. Without caring for health care professionals, the entire system cannot function at the highest level over the long term. Finally, this document is not intended to be static; it is meant to be a living guide that should change and evolve with new evidence, experience, innovative practices, and feedback from its users. We suggest using this document and the associated tools and case examples that will be posted online at https://www.ilcor.org/IHCA (not yet activated), to help others with implementation of the Ten Steps. This will allow these steps to remain responsive and relevant to the changing needs of health care institutions and the diversity of the populations they serve. Your contribution in the form of insights, experiences, suggestions, and case examples to this online site will help ensure the ongoing refinement and enhancement of these guidelines. Create a governance structure with administrative leadership to advance resuscitation excellence. Empower local operational champions and ensure a robust quality improvement program. Building a robust governance structure with administrative leadership committed to advancing resuscitation excellence is a key foundation to improving survival from IHCA. Delivery of resuscitation care requires structures (eg, appropriate equipment, adequately trained health care professionals, prospective resuscitation database) and processes (eg, evidence-informed protocols, policies, and procedures). These integrate to form an effective system of resuscitation care, which leads to improved patient outcomes, held together by a framework of continuous quality improvement.15Semeraro F. Greif R. Bottiger B.W. Burkart R. Cimpoesu D. Georgiou M. Yeung J. Lippert F. S Lockey A. Olasveengen T.M. European Resuscitation Council guidelines et al.. European Resuscitation Council guidelines 2021: systems saving lives.Resuscitation. 2021; 161: 80-97https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.008Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar, 16Kronick S.L. Kurz M.C. Lin S. Edelson D.P. Berg R.A. Billi J.E. Cabanas J.G. Cone D.C. Diercks D.B. Foster J.J. et al.Part 4: systems of care and continuous quality improvement: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.Circulation. 2015; 132: S397-S413https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000258Crossref PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar Local operational champions leading resuscitation programs should be individuals who are invested in and have accountability and authority to oversee such programs, so that they can advocate for change and ensure the sustainability of changes and developments.17O’Halloran A. Shepard L.N. Nadkarni V.M. Building a culture of champions: the importance of leadership in resuscitation.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021; 10e020390https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.020390Crossref PubMed Scopus (0) Google Scholar A recent study on hospital champions and IHCA survival found that hospitals with an active physician champion were 4× more likely to be in a higher survival quintile.18Chan J.L. Lehrich J. Nallamothu B.K. Tang Y. Kennedy M. Trumpower B. Chan P.S. American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines®-Resuscitation Investigators. Association between hospital resuscitation champion and survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021; 10e017509https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017509Crossref Scopus (7) Google Scholar A review of champions in health care–related implementation consistently found that they are critical to implementation effectiveness.19Miech E.J. Rattray N.A. Flanagan M.E. Damschroder L. Schmid A.A. Damush T.M. Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation.SAGE Open Med. 2018; 62050312118773261https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118773261Crossref Scopus (204) Google Scholar Champions can engage administrative leadership to obtain resources needed for appropriate equipment (eg, defibrillators, resuscitation medications, airway devices, CPR compression quality-monitoring devices), advocate for participation in a resuscitation database, and ensure adequately trained health care professionals, to implement evidence-informed protocols, policies, and procedures. Supportive infrastructure and policies will be needed for achieving high-quality care and outcomes in IHCA, to identify motivated and passionate champions, and to provide champions with resources to innovate and direct continuous quality improvement. Effective leaders and teams will draw from multiple disciplines and hospital departments (eg, medical, nursing, respiratory therapy, pharmacy) linked to best practices in IHCA education and training.20Anderson T.M. Secrest K. Krein S.L. Schildhouse R. Guetterman T.C. Harrod M. Trumpower B. Kronick S.L. Pribble J. Chan P.S. et al.Best practices for education and training of resuscitation teams for in-hospital cardiac arrest.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021; 14e008587https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008587Crossref PubMed Scopus (6) Google Scholar Champions who are present, visible, and who actively seek feedback and address concerns will be those who most effectively build trust within their teams and the larger resuscitation system. Use data to assess education, training, performance, and outcomes across the continuum of resuscitation care and to devise and evaluate the impact of quality improvement efforts to ensure their sustainability. Consider participating in resuscitation registries to enable benchmarking and contribute to knowledge transfer. You cannot improve what you do not measure. Measurement is the cornerstone of performance management and quality improvement. At a basic level, this should include measuring cardiac arrest occurrence and survival outcomes. However, collection of data across the broader continuum of in-hospital resuscitation care enables assessment of performance and identification of areas for improvement. The specific nature of the data to be collected should be driven by the resources and needs of the hospital that can differ across institutions. For example, measurement of CPR quality could provide insights regarding CPR training needs21Cheng A, Nadkarni VM, Mancini MB, Hunt EA, Sinz EH, Merchant RM, Donoghue A, Duff JP, Eppich W, Auerbach M, et al; American Heart Association Education Science Investigators; and on behalf of the American Heart Association Education Science and Programs Committee, Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Resuscitation education science: educational strategies to improve outcomes from cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138:e82–e122. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000583.Google Scholar; measurement of time to defibrillation could identify the need for easier and faster access to defibrillators.22Chan P.S. Krumholz H.M. Nichol G. Nallamothu B.K. American Heart Association National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Investigators. Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest.N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 9-17https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706467Crossref PubMed Scopus (477) Google Scholar The ILCOR Utstein reporting statement for IHCA represents one example of how hospitals and health systems could collect such data. This statement provides guidance for developing core and supplemental data elements across 6 domains: hospital, patients, pre-event, cardiac arrest process, postresuscitation process, and outcomes.23Nolan J.P. Berg R.A. Andersen L.W. Bhanji F. Chan P.S. Donnino M.W. Lim S.H. Ma M.H. Nadkarni V.M. Starks M.A. et al.Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the utstein resuscitation registry template for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a consensus report from a task force of ILCOR.Circulation. 2019; 140: e746-e757https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000710Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar To enable comparisons both within and between institutions, adherence to Utstein definitions for variables optimizes usefulness of the data collected.23Nolan J.P. Berg R.A. Andersen L.W. Bhanji F. Chan P.S. Donnino M.W. Lim S.H. Ma M.H. Nadkarni V.M. Starks M.A. et al.Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the utstein resuscitation registry template for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a consensus report from a task force of ILCOR.Circulation. 2019; 140: e746-e757https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000710Crossref PubMed Scopus (91) Google Scholar Over the last decade, there has been a proliferation of national and regional out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registries.24Nishiyama C. Kiguchi T. Okubo M. Alihodžić H. Al-Araji R. Baldi E. Beganton F. Booth S. Bray J. Christensen E. et al.Three-year trends in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest across the world: second report from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR).Resuscitation. 2023; 186109757https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109757Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar Although participation in a cardiac arrest registry can help catalyze quality improvement efforts through benchmarking, there are relatively few national or regional IHCA registries.25Chan P.S. Kennedy K.F. Girotra S. American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation Investigators. Updating the model for risk-standardizing survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest to facilitate hospital comparisons.Resuscitation. 2023; 183109686https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.109686Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar Exceptions include the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry,26American Heart Association. Get With The Guidelines® Resuscitation. Accessed June 12, 2023. https://www.heart.org/en/professional/quality-improvement/get-with-the-guidelines/get-with-the-guidelines-resuscitation.Google Scholar the National Cardiac Arrest Audit in the United Kingdom,27National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA). Accessed June 16, 2023. https://www.icnarc.org/Our-Audit/Audits/Ncaa/About.Google Scholar and several smaller registries.1Andersen L.W. Holmberg M.J. Berg K.M. Donnino M.W. Granfeldt A. In-hospital cardiac arrest: a review.J Am Med Assoc. 2019; 321: 1200-1210https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1696Crossref PubMed Scopus (453) Google Scholar There is evidence from observational studies that Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation participation duration is associated with a significant improvement in IHCA quality of care28Starks M.A. Dai D. Nichol G. Al-Khatib S.M. Chan P. Bradley S.M. Peterson E.D. American Heart Association’s Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation Investigators. The Association of Duration of participation in get with the guidelines-resuscitation with quality of care for in-hospital cardiac arrest.Am Heart J. 2018; 204: 156-162https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.018Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar and event survival.29Bradley S.M. Huszti E. Warren S.A. Merchant R.M. Sayre M.R. Nichol G. Duration of

Science Challenges the Dogmas of CPR

The Discussion of Several Problems about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Cardiac Arrest

CPR—Letters of the Law

Abstract 247: Hands-on Defibrillation Has the Potential to Improve CPR Quality and Is Safe for Rescuers: A Preclinical Study

Challenging The Rationale Of Three Sequential Shocks For Defibrillation

Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

A review of compression, ventilation, defibrillation, drug treatment, and targeted temperature management in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Continuous Compression Without Defibrillation Favoured No Short-Term Survival in Prolonged Ventricular Fibrillation

Mechanical, Team-Focused, Video-Reviewed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Return of Spontaneous Circulation After Emergency Department Implementation.

American Heart Association report on the public access defibrillation conference December 8-10, 1994

Adverse Outcomes of Interrupted Precordial Compression During Automated Defibrillation.

Optimizing the duration of CPR prior to defibrillation improves the outcome of CPR in a rat model of prolonged cardiac arrest.

Incorporation of Drone Technology Into the Chain of Survival for OHCA: Estimation of Time Needed for Bystander Treatment of OHCA and CPR Performance

Comparison Between the Advanced Cardiac Life Support and Adult Advanced Life Support Protocols: A Simulation‐Based Pilot Study

Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes.

Automated External Defibrillators: Technical Considerations and Clinical Promise

[Prone Position-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Adults: a Scoping Review].

Lay Rescuer Automated External Defibrillator (“public Access Defibrillation”) Programs

Update Reanimation – was gibt es Neues?

Editorial: Extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)