Comparison of undergraduate nursing students′ learning outcomes in actual versus simulated learning environment

金三丽,黄天笑,李佳晋
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20221018-01316
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore undergraduate nursing students′ learning outcomes in actual and simulated learning environment and to compare them.Methods:A convenient sample of 193 undergraduate nursing students from 4 universities in Beijing completed clinical learning environment comparison survey (CLECS). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the differences.Results:The total CLECS score in actual learning environment (80.5±15.3) was higher than that in the simulated learning environment (76.6±14.1), and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-3.03, P=0.002). The scores of the four dimensions including communication, holistic, critical thinking, and teaching-learning dyad in actual learning environment were higher than those in the simulated learning environment, with the scores being (9.1±2.0) vs. (7.5±2.3), (11.4±3.2) vs. (10.3±3.4), (6.2±1.5) vs. (5.5±1.6), and (15.5±3.4) vs. (15.1±3.1), respectively, and the differences were all statistically significant ( P<0.05). The score of the self-efficacy dimension in the actual learning environment (10.9±2.5) was lower than that in the simulated learning environment (11.4±2.6), and the difference was statistically significant ( Z=-2.64, P=0.008). Conclusions:It is recommended that nursing faculty establish clinical teaching guidelines that combine actual clinical practice with simulated clinical practice to achieve optimal results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?