TVOC and Health in Non-industrial Indoor Environments. Report from a Nordic Scientific Consensus Meeting at Langholmen in Stockholm, 1996
K. Andersson,J. V. Bakke,O. Bjorseth,C.-G. Bornehag,G. Clausen,J. K. Hongslo,M. Kjellman,S. Kjaergaard,F. Levy,L. Molhave,S. Skerfving,J. Sundell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-2-00002.x
IF: 6.5539
1997-01-01
Indoor Air
Abstract:Indoor AirVolume 7, Issue 2 p. 78-91 TVOC and Health in Non-industrial Indoor Environments Report from a Nordic Scientific Consensus Meeting at Långholmen in Stockholm, 1996 K. Andersson, K. Andersson National Institute for Working Life, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorJ. V. Bakke, J. V. Bakke The National Labour Inspectorate, NorwaySearch for more papers by this authorO. Bjørseth, O. Bjørseth Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NorwaySearch for more papers by this authorC.-G. Bornehag, C.-G. Bornehag National Testing and Research Institute, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorG. Clausen, G. Clausen Laboratory of Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorJ. K. Hongslo, J. K. Hongslo Department of Environmental Medicine, National Institute of Public Health, NorwaySearch for more papers by this authorM. Kjellman, M. Kjellman Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital, Linköping, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorS. Kjærgaard, S. Kjærgaard Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorF. Levy, F. Levy Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, NorwaySearch for more papers by this authorL. Mølhave, L. Mølhave Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorS. Skerfving, S. Skerfving Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Sundell, J. Sundell Karolinska Institute, Sweden, National Institute of Public Health, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author K. Andersson, K. Andersson National Institute for Working Life, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorJ. V. Bakke, J. V. Bakke The National Labour Inspectorate, NorwaySearch for more papers by this authorO. Bjørseth, O. Bjørseth Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NorwaySearch for more papers by this authorC.-G. Bornehag, C.-G. Bornehag National Testing and Research Institute, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorG. Clausen, G. Clausen Laboratory of Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorJ. K. Hongslo, J. K. Hongslo Department of Environmental Medicine, National Institute of Public Health, NorwaySearch for more papers by this authorM. Kjellman, M. Kjellman Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital, Linköping, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorS. Kjærgaard, S. Kjærgaard Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorF. Levy, F. Levy Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, NorwaySearch for more papers by this authorL. Mølhave, L. Mølhave Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorS. Skerfving, S. Skerfving Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, SwedenSearch for more papers by this authorJ. Sundell, J. Sundell Karolinska Institute, Sweden, National Institute of Public Health, SwedenSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 April 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-2-00002.xCitations: 124 13Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at National Testing and Research Institute, Box 857, S-501 15 Boras, Sweden AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract Abstract The presence of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in indoor air has in past decades often been associated with adverse health effects such as sensory irritation, odour and the more complex set of symptoms called the Sick Building Syndrome (SBS). More recently, a possible link between the increase in the prevalence of allergies throughout the industrialized areas of the world and exposure to elevated concentrations of VOCs has been suggested. In many cases, the total VOC (TVOC) is used as a measure of the concentration of air pollution and, by extension, as a measure of the health risk in non-industrial buildings. However, the TVOC concept has been questioned for a number of reasons, including the facts that it is an ambiguous concept, that individual VOCs making up the whole can be expected to give rise to different effects in people and that researchers have been using different definitions and interpretations of TVOC. This means that simple addition of the quantities of individual VOCs may not be relevant from a health point of view. Twelve researchers from the Nordic countries have reviewed the literature on VOC/TVOC and health. A search of the literature resulted in the identification of about 1100 articles, of which 120 were selected for further examination. A final review of the articles reduced their number to 67 that contained data on both exposure and health effects. The group concluded that indoor air pollution including VOC is most likely a cause of health effects and comfort problems in indoor environments in non-industrial buildings. However, the scientific literature is inconclusive with respect to TVOC as a risk index for health and comfort effects in buildings. Consequently, there is at present an inadequate scientific basis on which to establish limit values/guidelines for TVOC, both for air concentrations, and for emissions from building materials. The group concluded that continued research is required to establish a risk index for health and comfort effects for VOC in non-industrial buildings. References Andersson, S., Sverdrup, C. and GrantéAn, J. (1992) Klimatet i Den Inre MiljöUn, Stockholm Byggforskiningsrådet (8800629) Baird, J., Berglund, B., Berglund, U., Nicander-Bredberg, H. and Noma, E. (1987) “Distinguishing between healthy and sick preschools by chemical classification”, Environment International, 13, 167– 174. Bælum, J., Lundqvist, G., Mølhave, L. and Andersen, N. (1990) “Human response to varying concentrations of toluene”, International Archives of Occupational Environment and Health, 62, 65– 71. Bener, A., Gomes, J. and Hamouda, M. (1996) “Hypertension among workers occupationally exposed to hydrocarbons and organic solvents”, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, A31(2), 291– 303. Berglund, B. (1988) “ Pattern analysis and psychochemistry of air”. In: The Use of QSAR for Chemicals Screening: Limitations and Possibilities, Stockholm , National Chemical Inspectorate, pp. 31– 51 (KEMI Report No. 8). Berglund, B., Johansson, L, Lindvall, T. and Lundin, L. (1989) “ Air quality and symptoms in a sick library building with a return-air ventilation system”. In: Proceedings of Clima 2000, Amersfoort , Netherlands , REHVA, Vol. III, pp. 13– 18. Berglund, B., Johansson, L, Lindvall, T. and Lundin, L. (1990) “ A longitudinal study of perceived air quality and comfort in a sick library building”. In: D.S. Walkinshaw (ed.) Proceedings of Indoor Air '90, Ottawa , Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Vol. 1, pp. 489– 494. Berglund, B., Berglund, U. and Engen, T. (1992) “Can sick buildings be assessed by testing human performance in field experiments?”, Environment International, 18, 221– 229. Berglund, B. and Esfandabad, H. (1993) “ A bisensory testing procedure suitable for odorous irritants and emissions from building materials”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 1, pp. 107– 112. Bernhard, C., Kirchner, S., Knutti, R. and Lagoudi, A. (1995) “ Volatile organic compounds in 56 office buildings”. In: M. Maroni (ed.), Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '95, Milan , Vol. 3, pp. 1347– 1352. Bluyssen, P., Fernandes, de O., Groes, L., Clausen, G., Fanger, P.O., Valbørn, O., Bernhard, C. and Roulet, C. (1995) “ European audit study in 56 office buildings: conclusions and recommendations”. In: M. Maroni (ed.), Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '95, Milan , Vol. 3, pp. 1287– 1292. Bornehag, C.–G. (1994) MöUnsteranalys av Inomhusluft. UndersöUkning av Luftkvaliteten i Sjuka Hus med Flytspackelproblem, Stockholm , ByggforskningsråRdet (Thesis, R23: 1994) (in Swedish with English summary). Bornehag, C.–G. (1995) “ Pattern analysis of VOC in indoor air”. In: M. Maroni (ed.), Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '95, Milan , Vol. 1, pp. 487– 492. Brinke, J.T (1995) Development of New VOC Exposure Metrics and their Relationship to “Sick Building Syndrome” Symptoms, Berkeley , CA , Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California (Thesis, LBL-37652, UC-407). Broder, I., Corey, P. and Pilger, C. (1993) “ Influence of volatile organic compounds on the wellbeing of workers in office buildings”. In: P. Leslie and R. Perry (eds) Volatile Organic Compounds in the Environment, London , Indoor Air International, pp. 595– 604. Brown, S.K, Sim, M., Abramson, M. and Gray, C. (1994) “Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in indoor air – a review”, Indoor Air, 4, 123– 134. Burge, P. (1992) “The sick building syndrome – where are we in 1992?”, Indoor Environment, 1, 199– 203. Carrer, P., Cavallo, D., Fiocchi, V., Assini, R., Galli, L., Pierini, F., Troiano, P., Piccoli, B. and Maroni, M. (1995) “ Eye symptoms and signs in office workers: correlation with chemico-physical factors and VDU-work”. In: M. Maroni (ed.), Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '95, Milan , Vol. 3, pp. 1493– 1498. Chan, C.C, Lin, S.H and Her, G.R (1993) “Students' exposure to volatile organic compounds while commuting by motorcycle and bus in Taipei city”, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 43, 1231– 1238. Chester, A. (1991) “Sick building syndrome and sinusitis”, The Lancet, 339 (letter and comment). Cometto-Muniz, E. and Cain, W. (1994) “Perception of odor and nasal pungency from homologous series of volatile organic compounds”, Indoor Air, 4, 140– 145. Cometto-Muniz, E. and Cain, W. (1995) “ Mixtures of volatile organic compounds: detection of odor, nasal pungency and eye irritation”. In: M. Maroni (ed.), Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '95, Milan , Vol. 1, pp. 171– 182. De Bortoli, M., Knöppel, H., Peil, A., Pecchio, E., Schlitt, H. and De Wilde, H. (1990) “ Investigation of the contribution of volatile organic compounds to air quality complaints in office buildings of the European parliament”. In: D.S Walkinshaw (ed.) Proceedings of Indoor Air '90, Ottawa , Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Vol. 2, pp. 695– 700. Farant, J.–P., Baldwin, M., De Repentigny, F. and Robb, R. (1992) “Environmental conditions in a recently constructed office building before and after the implementation of energy conservation measures”, Applied and Occupational Environmental Hygiene, 7(2), pp. 93– 100. Fisk, W., Mendell, M., Daisey, J., Faulkner, D., Hodgson, A., Nemotollahi, M. and Macher, J. (1993) “Phase 1 of the California healthy building study: a summary”, Indoor Air, 3, 246– 254. Godish, T., Godish, D., Hooper, B. and Hooper, M. (1995) “ Latrobe valley indoor air quality study: health and house variables”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air: an Integrated Approach, Amsterdam , Elsevier, pp. 211– 214. Gustafsson, H. (1992) Building Materials identified as Major Emission Sources: a Critical Review of Case Studies, Stockholm , Swedish Council for Building Research (D10). Gyntelberg, F., Suadicani, P., Nielsen, W.J, Skov, P., Valbjørn, O., Nielsen, P.A, Schneider, T., Jørgensen, O., Wolkoff, P., Wilkins, C.K, Gravesen, S. and Norn, S. (1994) “Dust and the sick building syndrome”, Indoor Air, 4, 223– 238. Haghighat, F, Donnini, G. and D'Addario, R. (1992) “Relationship between occupant discomfort as perceived and as measured objectively”, Indoor Environment, 1(2), 112– 118. Hammad, Y. (1994) “The problem of the ‘sick’ building: facts and implications: identifying and measuring indoor non-biological agents”, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 94(2), Part 2, pp. 389– 393. Harving, H., Dahl, R. and Mølhave, L. (1991) “Lung function and broncial reactivity in asthmatics during exposure to volatile organic compounds”, American Review of Respiratory Diseases, 143, 751– 754. Hedge, A., Sterling, T.D, Sterling, E.M, Collett, C., Sterling, D.A and Nie, V. (1989) “Indoor air quality and health in two office buildings with different ventilation systems Environment International, 15, 115– 128. Henry, C., Fishbein, L., Meggs, W., Ashford, N., Schulte, P., Anderson, H., Osborne, S. and Sepkovic, D. (1991) “Approaches for assessing health risks from complex mixtures in indoor air: a panel overview”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 95, 135– 143. Hodgson, M. (1991) “Indoor air quality”, Allergy Proceedings, 12(6), pp. 371– 383. Hodgson, M., Frohliger, J., Permar, E., Tidwell, C., Traven, N., Olenchock, S. and Karpf, M. (1991) “Symptoms and microenvironmental measures in nonproblem buildings”, Journal of Occupational Medicine, 33(4), pp. 527– 533. Hodgson, M. (1992) “Field studies on the sick building syndrome”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 641, 21– 36. Hodgson, M., Muldoon, S., Collopy, P. and Olesen, B. (1992) “ Sick building syndrome symptoms, work stress and environmental measures”. In: Proceedings of IAQ '92: Environment for People, Atlanta , GA , American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, pp. 47– 56. Hodgson, M., Levin, H. and Wolkoff, P. (1994) “Volatile organic compounds and indoor air”, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 94(2), Part 2, pp. 296– 303. Hudnell, K., Otto, D., House, D. and Mølhave, L. (1990) Odor and Irritation Effects of a VOC Mixture, Research Triangle Park, NC, US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service (Report PB90-263310). Hudnell, K., Otto, D., House, D. and Mølhave, L. (1992) “Exposure of humans to a volatile organic mixture, II. Sensory”, Archives of Environmental Health, 47(1), 31– 38. Hudnell, K., Otto, D. and House, D. (1993) “ Time course of odor and irritation effects in humans exposed to a mixture of 22 volatile organic compounds”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 1, pp. 567– 572. Iregren, A., Löf, A., Toomingas, A. and Wang, Z. (1993) “Irritation effects from experimental exposure to n-Butyl Acetate”, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 24, 727– 742. Johnsen, C., Heinig, J., Schmidt, K., Albrechtsen, O., Nielsen, P., Wolkoff, P., Nielsen, G., Hansen, L. and Franck, C. (1991) “A study of human reactions to emissions from building materials in climate chambers, Part I: Clinical data performance and comfort, Indoor Air, 4, 377– 388. Karpe, P., Kirchner, S. and Rouxel, P. (1995) “ Sensory evaluation of wall and floor coverings using an odour intensity method”. In: M. Maroni (ed.), Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '95, Milan , Vol. 2, pp. 935– 940. Kærgaard, S., Mølhave, L. and Pedersen, O. (1989) “Human reactions to indoor air pollutants n-decane”, Environment International, 15, 473– 482. Kjærgaard, S., Mølhave, L. and Pedersen, O. (1991) “Human reactions to a mixture of indoor air volatile organic compounds”, Atmospheric Environment, 25A(8), 1417– 1426. Kjærgaard, S., Rasmussen, T., Mølhave, L. and Pedersen, O. (1995) “An experimental comparison of indoor air VOC effects on hayfever- and healthy subjects”. In: Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '95, Vol. I, pp. 567– 572. Koren, H., Graham, D. and Devlin, R. (1992a) “Exposure of humans to a volatile organic mixture. III. Inflammatory response”, Archives of Environmental Health, 47(1), pp. 39– 44. Koren, H. and Devlin, R. (1992b) “Human upper respiratory tract responses to inhaled pollutants with emphasis on nasal lavage”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 641, 215– 223. Kosiainen, R. (1995) “Volatile organic compounds in the indoor air of normal and sick houses”, Atmospheric Environment, 29(6), 693– 702. Krzyzanowski, M., Quackenboss, J. and Lebowitz, M. (1990) “Chronic respiratory effects of indoor formaldehyde exposure”, Environmental Research, 52, 117– 125. Liao, S., Bacon-Shone, J. and Kim, Y.–S. (1991) “Factors influencing indoor air quality in Hong Kong: measurements in offices and shops”, Environmental Technology, 12, 737– 745. Lin, J. and Yao, Y.–H. (1993) “Formaldehyde in conventional homes in Taiwan”, Environment International 19, 561– 568. Llewellyn, J. and Smith, L. (1995) “ Indoor air quality in the UK: the Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood (Alspac)”. In: M. Maroni (ed.), Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '95, Milan , Vol. 1, pp. 373– 378. Lundin, L. (1993) “ Symptom patterns and air quality in a sick library”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 1, pp. 127– 132. Meggs, W. (1993) “Neurogenic inflammation and sensitivity to environmental chemicals”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 101(3), pages 234– 238. Menzies, R., Tamblyn, R., Farant, J.P, Hanley, J., Tamblyn, R.T, Nunes, F. and Marcotte, P. (1991) “ The effect of varying levels of outdoor ventilation on symptoms of the sick building syndrome”. In: Proceedings of IAQ '91: Healthy Buildings, Atlanta , GA , American Society of Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, pp. 90– 96. Menzies, R., Tamblyn, R.T, Hanley, J., Nunes, F. and Tamblyn, R.M (1993) “ Impact of exposure to multiple contaminants on symptoms of the sick building syndrome”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 1, pp. 363– 368. Merchan, M.L and de la Serna, J. (1986) “Formaldehyde as an indoor pollutant”, Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 13, 17– 25. Montgomery, D. and Kalman, A. (1989) “Indoor/outdoor air quality: reference pollutant concentrations in complaint-free residences”, Applied Industrial Hygiene, 4(1), pp. 17– 20. Moschandreas, D., Relwani, S. and Novesel, D. (1990) “ Characterization of a healthy building”. In: D.S Walkinshaw (ed.), Proceedings of Indoor Air '90, Ottawa , Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Vol. 1, pp. 555– 560. Mølhave, L. (1982) “Indoor air pollution due to organic gases and vapors of solvents in building materials”, Environment International, 8, 117– 127. Mølhave, L., Bach, B. and Pederson, O. (1986) “Human reactions to low concentrations of volatile organic compounds”, Environment International, 12, 167– 175. Mølhave, L. (1989) “The sick buildings and other buildings with indoor climate problems”, Environment International, 15, 65– 74. Mølhave, L. (1990) “ Volatile organic compounds, indoor air quality and health”. In: D.S Walkinshaw (ed.) Proceedings of Indoor Air '90, Ottawa , Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Vol. 1, pp. 15– 33. Mølhave, L. (1991) “Indoor climate, air pollution and human comfort”, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 1(1), pp. 63– 81. Mølhave, L., Jensen, J. and Larsen, S. (1991) “Subjective reactions to volatile organic compounds as air pollutants”, Atmospheric Environment, 25A(7), 1238– 1293. Mølhave, L., Liu, Z., Jørgensen, A., Pederson, O. and Kjærgaard, S. (1993a) “Sensory and physiological effects on humans of combined exposures to air temperature and volatile organic compounds”, Indoor Air, 3, 155– 169. Mølhave, L., Kjærgaard, S., Pedersen, O., Jørgensen, A. and Pedersen, T. (1993b) “ Human response to different mixtures of volatile organic compounds”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 1, pp. 555– 560. Mølhave, L., Dueholm, S. and Jensen, L. (1995) “Assessment of exposures and health risks related to formaldehyde emissions from furniture: a case study”, Indoor Air, 5, 104– 119. Nelson, C, Clayton, C, Wallace, L., Highsmith, V, Kollander, M., Bascom, R. and Leaderer, B. (1991) “ EPA's indoor air quality and work environment survey: relationships of employees' self-reported health symptoms with direct indoor air quality measurements”. In: Proceedings of IAQ '91: Healthy Buildings, Atlanta , GA , American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, pp. 22– 32. Nelson, N., Kaufman, J., Burt, J. and Karr, C. (1995) “Health symptoms and the work environment in four non-problem United States office buildings”, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 21, 51– 59. Nexø, B. (1995) “Risk assessment methodologies for carcinogenic compounds in indoor air”, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 21, 376– 381. Noma, E., Berglund, B., Berglund, U., Johansson, I. and Baird, J. (1988) “Joint representation of physical locations and volatile organic compounds in indoor air from a healthy and a sick building”, Atmospheric Environment, 22(3), 451– 460. Norbäck, D., Rand, G., Michel, I. and Amcoff, S. (1989) “The prevalence of symptoms associated with sick buildings and polluted industrial environments as compared to unex-posed reference groups without expressed dissatisfaction”, Environment International, 15(1-6), 85– 94. Norbäck, D., Michel, I. and Widström, J. (1990a) “Indoor air quality and personal factors related to the sick building syndrome”, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 16, 121– 128. Norbäck, D., Torgén, M. and Edling, C. (1990b) “Volatile organic compounds, respirable dust and personal factors related to prevalence and incidence of the sick building syndrome in primary schools”, British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 47, 733– 741. Norbäck, D. and Edling, C. (1991) “Environmental, occupational and personal factors related to the prevalence of the sick building syndrome in the general population”, British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 48, 451– 462. Norbäck, D., Edling, C., Wieslander, G. and Ramadhan, S. (1993) “ Exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the general Swedish population and its relation to perceived air quality and the sick building syndrome (SBS)”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 1, pp. 573– 578. Norbäck, D., Wieslander, G., Ström, G. and Edling, C. (1994) “Exposure to volatile organic compounds of microbial origin (MVOC) during indoor application of water-based paints”, Indoor Air, 5, 166– 170. Norbäck, D. (1995) “Subjective indoor air quality in schools the influence of high room temperature, carpeting, fleecy wall materials and volatile organic compounds”, Indoor Air, 5, 237– 246. Norbäck, D., Björnsson, E., Janson, C., Widström, J. and Boman, G. (1995a) “Asthmatic symptoms and volatile organic compounds: formaldehyde and carbon dioxide in dwellings”, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52, 388– 395. Norbäck, D., Björnsson, E., Janson, C. and Boman, G. (1995b) “ Sick building syndrome (SBS) and the home environment – the role of inflammatory reactions and exposure to volatile organic compounds”. In: J. J. Knight and R. Perry (eds) Second International Conference. Volatile Organic Compounds in the Environment, London , Indoor Air International, pp. 179– 185. Nordsträm, K., Norbäck, D. and Akselsson, R. (1994) “Effect of air humidification on the sick building syndrome and perceived indoor air quality in hospitals: a four-month longitudinal study”, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51, 683– 688. Nordsträm, K., Norbäck, D. and Akselsson, R. (1995) “Influence of indoor air quality and personal factors on the sick building syndrome in Swedish geriatric hospitals”, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52, 170– 176. Otto, D., Mølhave, L., Rose, G., Hudnell, K. and House, D. (1990a) “Neurobehavioral and sensory irritant effects of controlled exposure to a complex mixture of volatile organic compounds”, Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 12, 649– 652. Otto, D., Mølhave, L., Goldstein, G., O'Neill, J., House, D., Rose, G., Berntsen, J., Counts, W., Fowler, S., Hudnell, K. and Meade, S. (1990b) Neurotic Effects of Controlled Exposure to a Complex Mixture of Volatile Organic Compounds, Research Triangle Park, NC, US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service (Report PB90-186438). Otto, D., Hudnell, K. and House, D. (1992) “Exposure of humans to a volatile organic mixture. I. Behavioral assessment”, Archives of Environmental Health, 47(1), pp. 23– 30. Otto, D., Hudnell, K., House, D. and Prah, J. (1993) “ Neurobehavioral and subjective reactions of young men and women to a complex mixture of volatile organic compounds”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 1, pp. 59– 64. Prah, J., Hazucha, M., Horstman, D., Garlington, R., Case, M., Ashley, D. and Tepper, J. (1993) “ Pulmonary, respiratory and irritant effects of exposure to a mixture of VOCs at three concentrations in young men”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 1, pp. 607– 612. Quackenboss, J., Lebowitz, M., Michaud, J. and Bronnimann, D. (1989) “Formaldehyde exposure and acute health effects study”, Environment International, 15, 169– 176. Rothweiler, H., Wäger, A. and Schlatter, C. (1992) “Volatile organic compounds and some very volatile organic compounds in new and recently renovated buildings in Switzerland”, Atmospheric Environment, 26A(12), 2219– 2225. Rothweiler, H. and Schlatter, C. (1993) “Human exposure to volatile organic compounds in indoor air – a health risk?”, Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, 40, 93– 102. Rudnai, P., Sarkany, E., Banhidi, L., Gereben, Z., Bacskai, J., Kertesz, M., Martini, E and Selmeczy, K. (1994) “ Importance of human and housing factors in the prevalence of SBS symptoms among inhabitants of a residential area in Budapest”. In: Proceedings of Healthy Buildings '94, Budapest , Vol. 1, pp. 487– 492. Rylander, R., Persson, K., Goto, H., Yuasa, K. and Tanaka, S. (1992) “Airborne Beta-l,3-Glucan may be related to symptoms in sick buildings”, Indoor Environment, 1, 263– 267. Samet, J. and Lambert, W. (1991) “Epidemiological approaches for assessing health risks from complex mixtures in indoor air”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 95, 71– 74. Seifert, B. (1990) “ Regulating indoor air”. In: D.S Walkinshaw (ed.) Proceedings of Indoor Air '90, Ottawa , Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Vol. 5, pp. 35– 49. Skov, P., Valbjørn, O. and DISG (1987) “The sick building syndrome in the office environment: the Danish town hall study”, Environment International, 13, pp. 339– 349. Skov, P., Valbjørn, O. and Pedersen, B. (1990) “Influence of indoor climate on the sick building syndrome in an office environment”, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 16, 363– 371. Stridh, G., Fredriksson, R., Jansson, L., Robertson, S. and Viklund, L. (1993) “ Levels of volatile compounds (VOC) and formaldehyde in the Swedish housing stock”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air '93, Helsinki , International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 2, pp. 159– 163. Stridh, G. and Andersson, K. (1995) “ The effect of different restoring measures in a domestic area with severe indoor climate problems”. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air: An Integrated Approach, Amsterdam , Elsevier, pp. 247– 250. Ström, G., West, J., Wessén, B. and Palmgren, U. (1994) “Quantitative analysis of microbial volatiles in damp Swedish houses”. In: Air Quality Monographs, Vol. 2, Health Implications of Fungi in Indoor Environments, pp. 291– 305. Suh, H., Koutrakis, P. and Spengler, J. (1994) “The relationship between airborne acidity and ammonia in indoor environments”, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 4(1), pp. 1– 22. Sundell, J., Andersson, B., Andersson, K. and Lindvall, T. (1993) “Volatile organic compounds in ventilating air in buildings at different sampling points in the buildings and their relationship with the prevalence of occupant symptoms”, Indoor Air, 3, 82– 93. Sundell, J. and Kjellman, M. (1994) “Luften vi andas inomhus. Inornhusmiljöens betydelse för allergi och annan överkänslighed”, Folkhälsoinstitutet, 16. Sverdrup, C., Andersson, K. and Andersson, S. (1990) “ A comparative study of indoor climate and human health in 74 day care centers in Malmo, Sweden”. In: D.S Walkinshaw (ed.) Proceedings of Indoor Air '90, Ottawa , Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Vol. 2, pp. 651– 655. Hrasher, J., Madison, R., Broughton, A. and Gard, Z. (1989) “Building-related illness and antibodies to albumin conjugates for formaldehyde, toluene deisocyanate and trimellitic anhydride”, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 15, 187– 195. Utell, M.J and Looney, R.J (1995) “Environmentally induced asthma”, Toxicology Letters, 82/83, 47– 53. Wallace, L., Pellizzari, E. and Wendel, C. (1990) Total Volatile Organic Compounds Concentrations in 2700 Personal, Indoor, and Outdoor Air Samples Collected in the US EPA TEAM Studies, Research Triangle Park, US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service (Report PB91-182857). Wallace, L. (1991) “Comparison of risks from outdoor and indoor exposure to toxic chemicals”, Environmental Health Perspectives, 95, 7– 13. Wallace, L., Nelson, W. and Ziegenfus, R. (1991) “The Los Angeles Team study: personal exposures, indoor-outdoor air concentrations, and breath concentrations of 25 volatile organic compounds”, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 1(2), pp. 157– 167. Ware, J., Spengler, J., Neas, L., Samet, J., Wagner, G., Coultas, D., Ozkaynak, H. and Schwab, M. (1993) “Respiratory and irritant health effects of ambient volatile organic compounds – the Kanawha county study”, American Journal of Epidemiology, 137(12), pp. 1287– 1301. Weschler, C., Shields, H. and Rainer, D. (1990) “Concentrations of volatile organic compounds at a building with health and comfort complaints”, Journal of the American Industrial Hygiene Association, 51, pp. 261– 268. Wessén, B., Ström, G. and Schoeps, K. (1995) “ MVOC-pro-files – a tool for indoor air quality assessment. Proceedings of Indoor Air: an Integrated Approach, Amsterdam , Elsevier, pp. 67– 70. Wieslander, G., Norbäck, D., Björnsson, E., Janson, C. and Boman, G. (1995) “ Asthma and blood eosinophils in relation to exposure to fresh painted indoor surfaces and volatile organic compounds (VOC)”. In: G. Flatheim, K. Berg, K. I. Edvardsen (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Quality in Practice, Oslo , pp. 346– 352. Wilkins, C.K, Wolkoff, P., Gyntelberg, F., Skov, P. and Valbjørn, O. (1993) “Characterization of office dust by VOCs and TVOC release – identification of potential irritant VOCs by partial least squares analysis”, Indoor Air, 3, 283– 290. Willers, S., Andersson, S., Andersson, R., Granten, J., Sverdrup, C. and Rosell, L. (1995) “ Air concentrations of total organic compounds (TVOC) and carbon dioxide (CO2) and sick building syndrome (SBS) – symptoms among the staff in schools and kindergartens”. In: J.J Knight and R. Perry (eds), Second International Conference. Volatile Organic Compounds in the Environment, London , Indoor Air International, pp. 187– 192. Wolkoff, P., Nielsen, G., Hansen, L., Albrechtsen, O., Johnsen, C., Heinig, J., Franck, C. and Nielsen, P. (1991) “A study of human reactions to building materials in climate chambers. Part II, VOC measurement, mouse bioassay and decipol evaluation in the 1-2 mg/m3 TVOC range”, Indoor Air, 1(4), 389– 403. Wolkoff, P., Johnsen, C., Franck, C., Wilhardt, P. and Albrechtsen, O. (1992) “A study of human reactions to office machines in a climate chamber”, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, Suppl. 1. Wolkoff, P. (1995) Volatile Organic Compounds – Sources, Measurements, Emissions, and the Impact on Indoor Air Quality, Copenhagen , Arbejdstilsynet, National Institute of Occupational Health. Wolkoff, P. and Nielsen, P. (1996) “A new approach for indoor climate labeling of building materials-emission testing, modeling, and comfort evaluation”, Atmospheric Environment, 30(15), 2679– 2689. World Health Organization (1989) Indoor Air Quality: Organic Pollutants, Copenhagen , WHO Regional Office for Europe (EURO Reports and Studies No. 111). Zhang, J., Wilson, W. and Lioy, P. (1994) “Sources of organic acids in indoor air: a field study”, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 4(1), pp. 25– 47. Zweers, T., Skov, P., Valbjørn, O. and Mølhave, L. (1990) “The effect of ventilation and air pollution on perceived indoor air quality in five town halls”, Energy and Buildings, 14, 175– 181. Citing Literature Volume7, Issue2June 1997Pages 78-91 ReferencesRelatedInformation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Tvoc And Health In Non-Industrial Indoor Environments - Report From A Nordic Scientific Consensus Meeting At Langholmen In Stockholm, 1996
K. Andersson,J. V. Bakke,O. Bjorseth,C.-G. Bornehag,G. Clausen,J. K. Hongslo,M. Kjellman,S. Kjaergaard,F. Levy,L. Molhave,S. Skerfving,J. Sundell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-2-00002.x
IF: 6.5539
1997-01-01
Indoor Air
Abstract:The presence of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in indoor air has in past decades often been associated with adverse health effects such as sensory irritation, odour and the more complex set of symptoms called the Sick Building Syndrome (SBS). More recently, a possible link between the increase in the prevalence of allergies throughout the industrialized areas of the world and exposure to elevated concentrations of VOCs has been suggested. In many cases, the total VOC (TVOC) is used as a measure of the concentration of air pollution and, by extension, as a measure of the health risk in non-industrial buildings. However, the TVOC concept has been questioned for a number of reasons, including the facts that it is an ambiguous concept, that individual VOCs making up the whole can be expected to give rise to different effects in people and that researchers have been using different definitions and interpretations of TVOC. This means that simple addition of the quantities of individual VOCs may not be relevant from a health point of view.Twelve researchers from the Nordic countries have reviewed the literature on VOC/TVOC and health. A search of the literature resulted in the identification of about 1100 articles, of which 120 were selected for further examination. A final review of the articles reduced their number to 67 that contained data on both exposure and health effects.The group concluded that indoor air pollution including VOC is most likely a cause of health effects and comfort problems in indoor environments in non-industrial buildings. However, the scientific literature is inconclusive with respect to TVOC as a risk index for health and comfort effects in buildings. Consequently, there is at present an inadequate scientific basis on which to establish limit values/guidelines for TVOC, both for air concentrations, and for emissions from building materials. The group concluded that continued research is required to establish a risk index for health and comfort effects for VOC in non-industrial buildings. (C) Indoor Air (1997).
-
Volatile Organic-Compounds In Ventilating Air In Buildings At Different Sampling Points In The Buildings And Their Relationship With The Prevalence Of Occupant Symptoms (Reprinted From Indoor Air, Vol 3, Pg 82-93, 1993)
J Sundell,B Andersson,K Andersson,T Lindvall
1994-01-01
Abstract:Total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) are determined in intake, room-supply and room air in 86 office rooms in 29 office buildings in northern Sweden. Measurements of formaldehyde were also made in room air. Building and room characteristics were identified and symptom reports collected from 1087 office workers. Concentrations of TVOC and formaldehyde in room air were low, with mean values of 71 mug/m3 and 31 mug/m3 respectively. The TVOC concentration was generally lower in room air than in supply air or intake air. The ''loss'' (difference in measured values) of TVOC from supply to room air was associated with raised concentrations of formaldehyde and raised prevalences of occupant symptoms. High TVOC concentrations in room air were associated with reduced prevalences of occupant symptoms.
-
Volatile Organic Compounds in Ventilating Air in Buildings at Different Sampling Points in the Buildings and Their Relationship with the Prevalence of Occupant Symptoms
Jan Sundell,Barbro Anderson,Kurt Anderson,Thomas Lindvall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.t01-2-00003.x
IF: 6.5539
1993-01-01
Indoor Air
Abstract:Total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) are determined in intake, room-supply and room air in 86 office rooms in 29 office buildings in northern Sweden. Measurements of formaldehyde were also made in room air. Building and room characteristics were identified and symptom reports collected from 1087 office workers. Concentrations of TVOC and formaldehyde in room air were low, with mean values of 71 µg/m3 and 31 µg/m3, respectively. The TVOC concentration was generally lower in room air than in supply air or intake air. The “loss” (difference in measured values) of TVOC from supply to room air was associated with raised concentrations of formaldehyde and raised prevalences of occupant symptoms. High TVOC concentrations in room air were associated with reduced prevalences of occupant symptoms.
-
Indoor Carbon Dioxide, Fine Particulate Matter and Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Private Healthcare and Elderly Care Facilities
Alexandre Baudet,Estelle Baurès,Olivier Blanchard,Pierre Le Cann,Jean-Pierre Gangneux,Arnaud Florentin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030136
2022-03-12
Toxics
Abstract:Poor indoor air quality can have adverse effects on human health, especially in susceptible populations. The aim of this study was to measure the concentrations of dioxide carbon (CO2), fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) in situ in private healthcare and elderly care facilities. These pollutants were continuously measured in two rooms of six private healthcare facilities (general practitioner’s offices, dental offices and pharmacies) and four elderly care facilities (nursing homes) in two French urban areas during two seasons: summer and winter. The mean CO2 concentrations ranged from 764 ± 443 ppm in dental offices to 624 ± 198 ppm in elderly care facilities. The mean PM2.5 concentrations ranged from 13.4 ± 14.4 μg/m3 in dental offices to 5.7 ± 4.8 μg/m3 in general practitioner offices. The mean TVOC concentrations ranged from 700 ± 641 ppb in dental offices to 143 ± 239 ppb in general practitioner offices. Dental offices presented higher levels of indoor air pollutants, associated with the dental activities. Increasing the ventilation of these facilities by opening a window is probably an appropriate method for reducing pollutant concentrations and maintaining good indoor air quality.
environmental sciences,toxicology
-
Indoor air pollutants in office environments: Assessment of comfort, health, and performance
Peder Wolkoff
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.001
IF: 7.401
2013-07-01
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Abstract:Concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in office environments are generally too low to cause sensory irritation in the eyes and airways on the basis of estimated thresholds for sensory irritation. Furthermore, effects in the lungs, e.g. inflammatory effects, have not been substantiated at indoor relevant concentrations. Some VOCs, including formaldehyde, in combination may under certain environmental and occupational conditions result in reported sensory irritation. The odour thresholds of several VOCs are low enough to influence the perceived air quality that result in a number of acute effects from reported sensory irritation in eyes and airways and deterioration of performance. The odour perception (air quality) depends on a number of factors that may influence the odour impact. There is neither clear indication that office dust particles may cause sensory effects, even not particles spiked with glucans, aldehydes or phthalates, nor lung effects; some inflammatory effects may be observed among asthmatics. Ozone-initiated terpene reaction products may be of concern in ozone-enriched environments (≥0.1mg/m(3)) and elevated limonene concentrations, partly due to the production of formaldehyde. Ambient particles may cause cardio-pulmonary effects, especially in susceptible people (e.g. elderly and sick people); even, short-term effects, e.g. from traffic emission and candle smoke may possibly have modulating and delayed effects on the heart, but otherwise adverse effects in the airways and lung functions have not been observed. Secondary organic aerosols generated in indoor ozone-initiated terpene reactions appear not to cause adverse effects in the airways; rather the gaseous products are relevant. Combined exposure to particles and ozone may evoke effects in subgroups of asthmatics. Based on an analysis of thresholds for odour and sensory irritation selected compounds are recommended for measurements to assess the indoor air quality and to minimize reports of irritation symptoms, deteriorated performance, and cardiovascular and pulmonary effects.
infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
-
On the Association Between Building Ventilation Characteristics, Some Indoor Environmental Exposures, Some Allergic Manifestations and Subjective Symptom Reports
J SUNDELL
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1994.tb00031.x
IF: 6.5539
1994-01-01
Indoor Air
Abstract:The prevalence of some allergic and other hypersensitivity disorders has increased during recent decades, especially in industrialized countries. In Sweden, allergy towards house dust mites has increased and is linked to the home environment. In many countries, subjectively reported indoor-related symptoms such as those contained in the sick-building syndrome (SBS) have become a problem of concern. Typically, SBS involves general symptoms (e.g. headache and fatigue), mucous membrane symptoms (e.g. irritation of upper airways and the eye) and skin symptoms. SBS is attributed to a specific indoor environment, typically the place of work or the home. Great changes in building hygiene have taken place within recent decades due to e.g. the use of many new building materials, new technologies and energy-saving measures that have reduced ventilation.The aims of the present thesis are 1) to assess the associations between ventilation characteristics of homes, house dust mite infestation and allergy among children; 2) to assess the association between ventilation characteristics and occurrence of reported SBS-related symptoms among office workers; 3) to analyze associations between reported SBS-related symptoms and the reported sensation of dryness and associations between the reported sensation of dryness and physical air humidity, room characteristics and chemical factors; and 4) to study changes in total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) or formaldehyde concentration from outdoor air to room air and to study the associations between SBS-related symptom reports and concentrations of TVOC and formaldehyde in room air.The results from 3 different building and occupant studies are included. The first was a study in 2 steps on the association between allergic diseases among children (n = 160). house dust mite infestation, indoor exposure to air humidity, VOC and formaldehyde and the characteristics of the ventilation of homes (step 1: case-control study; step 2: comparative study of homes with high or low house dust mite infestation). The second was an office illness study in 3 steps on associations between building, room and ventilation characteristics, TVOC and formaldehyde and occurrence of reported SBS-related symptoms among office workers (n = 5986) (step 1: screening questionnaire; step 2: case-control studies; step 3: comparative study of buildings in which occupants exhibit a high or low prevalence of symptoms). The third study was a technical and chemical field study on the possible re-entrainment of indoor air pollutants (formaldehyde) via rotary heat exchangers.The methods used in the three studies comprised questionnaires, clinical investigations, site inspections and environmental measurements.In a region with cold winters, house dust mite infestation and thus house dust mite allergy was found to be associated with a low total outdoor air flow rate of the home and of the bedroom as well. A low outdoor air flow rate in offices was associated with an elevated prevalence of SBS symptoms. Ventilation operating hours less than 10 h per day, the presence of photocopiers, video display terminal work, a low rating of psychosocial conditions at work, female sex and reported asthma, eczema and skin sensitivity to sunlight were associated with an elevated risk of SBS symptoms. The type of ventilation system, recirculation of air and presence of rotary heat exchangers were not demonstrated to be associated with an elevated risk of SBS symptoms. TVOC may not be a valid construct of indoor air pollution from a health perspective in the low concentration exposure range. Indoor air chemistry, involving, for example, the possible transformation products of VOC may be important. The perception of ''dry air'' was associated with SBS symptoms. This perception was not demonstrated to be associated with physical air humidity.
-
Ventilation and Health in Non-Industrial Indoor Environments: Report from a European Multidisciplinary Scientific Consensus Meeting (EUROVEN)
Pawel Wargocki,Jan Sundell,W. Bischof,Geoffrey Brundrett,Povl Ole Fanger,Finn Gyntelberg,S. O. Hanssen,Paul Harrison,A. Pickering,Olli Seppänen,Peter Wouters
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0668.2002.01145.x
IF: 6.5539
2002-01-01
Indoor Air
Abstract:Scientific literature on the effects of ventilation on health, comfort, and productivity in non-industrial indoor environments (offices, schools, homes, etc.) has been reviewed by a multidisciplinary group of European scientists, called EUROVEN, with expertise in medicine, epidemiology, toxicology, and engineering. The group reviewed 105 papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and judged 30 as conclusive, providing sufficient information on ventilation, health effects, data processing, and reporting, 14 as providing relevant background information on the issue, 43 as relevant but non-informative or inconclusive, and 18 as irrelevant for the issue discussed. Based on the data in papers judged conclusive, the group agreed that ventilation is strongly associated with comfort (perceived air quality) and health [Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) symptoms, inflammation, infections, asthma, allergy, short-term sick leave], and that an association between ventilation and productivity (performance of office work) is indicated. The group also concluded that increasing outdoor air supply rates in non-industrial environments improves perceived air quality; that outdoor air supply rates below 25 l/s per person increase the risk of SBS symptoms, increase short-term sick leave, and decrease productivity among occupants of office buildings; and that ventilation rates above 0.5 air changes per hour (h-1) in homes reduce infestation of house dust mites in Nordic countries. The group concluded additionally that the literature indicates that in buildings with air-conditioning systems there may be an increased risk of SBS symptoms compared with naturally or mechanically ventilated buildings, and that improper maintenance, design, and functioning of air-conditioning systems contributes to increased prevalence of SBS symptoms.
-
Volatile organic compounds, respirable dust, and personal factors related to prevalence and incidence of sick building syndrome in primary schools.
D Norbäck,M Torgén,C Edling,D Norback,M Torgen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.47.11.733
IF: 4.9
1990-11-01
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Abstract:Possible relations between incidence and prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS), indoor exposures, and personal factors were studied in a four year longitudinal study among personnel (n = 129) in six primary schools. The mean concentration of carbon dioxide was above the recommended value of 0.08 microliter/l (800 ppm) in all schools, indicating a poor outdoor air supply. Indoor concentration of volatile hydrocarbon (VOC) was enhanced at high room temperatures. Respirable dust, but not concentration of VOC was enhanced at lower ventilation rates and high air humidity. Chronic SBS was related to VOC, previous wall to wall carpeting in the schools, hyper-reactivity, and psychosocial factors. Incidence of new SBS was related to concentration of respirable dust, current smoking, and the psychosocial climate. Remission of hyperreactivity, decrease in sick leave owing to airway illness, removal of carpeting in the schools, and moving from new to old dwellings resulted in a decrease in SBS score. It is concluded that SBS is of multifactorial origin, related to a variety of factors and exposures. The total concentration of hydrocarbons is a simple and convenient measure of exposure, which also seems to be a predictor of chronic symptoms. Further investigations on the effect of temperature, ventilation, and air humidity on SBS should consider how these factors may influence the chemical composition of the air. Because poor air quality in schools could also affect the children, it may have implications for the state of health of a large proportion of the population.
public, environmental & occupational health
-
Volatile Organic Compounds in 169 Energy-Efficient Dwellings in Switzerland.
Shen Yang,Vincent Perret,Corinne Hager Jorin,Helene Niculita-Hirzel,Joelle Goyette Pernot,Dusan Licina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12667
IF: 6.5539
2020-01-01
Indoor Air
Abstract:Exposure to elevated levels of certain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in households has been linked to deleterious health effects. This study presents the first large-scale investigation of VOC levels in 169 energy-efficient dwellings in Switzerland. Through a combination of physical measurements and questionnaire surveys, we investigated the influence of diverse building characteristics on indoor VOCs. Among 74 detected compounds, carbonyls, alkanes, and alkenes were the most abundant. Median concentration levels of formaldehyde (14 mu g/m(3)), TVOC (212 mu g/m(3)), benzene (<0.1 mu g/m(3)), and toluene (22 mu g/m(3)) were below the upper exposure limits. Nonetheless, 90% and 50% of dwellings exceeded the chronic exposure limits for formaldehyde (9 mu g/m(3)) and TVOC (200 mu g/m(3)), respectively. There was a strong positive correlation among VOCs that likely originated from common sources. Dwellings built between 1950s and 1990s, and especially, those with attached garages had higher TVOC concentrations. Interior thermal retrofit of dwellings and absence of mechanical ventilation system were associated with elevated levels of formaldehyde, aromatics, and alkanes. Overall, energy-renovated homes had higher levels of certain VOCs compared with newly built homes. The results suggest that energy efficiency measures in dwellings should be accompanied by actions to mitigate VOC exposures as to avoid adverse health outcomes.
-
After Thirty Years of Indoor Air Conferences, from 1978 Copenhagen to 2008 Copenhagen, Where Do We Stand?
Jan Sundell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00581.x
IF: 6.5539
2008-01-01
Indoor Air
Abstract:In 1978, the year of the first Indoor Air (Climate) conference (P.O. Fanger, O. Valbjoern, I. Andersen), the focus was divided between thermal climate and indoor air. Since then, indoor air quality (IAQ) has been the main topic. Main IAQ themes during the first and later conferences have been about formaldehyde. Humidity and radon were also discussed, as were volatile organic compounds (VOCs), energy, total volatile organic compounds (TVOC), mould and dampness, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), air cleaning, ventilation, ozone, indoor air chemistry, etc. During these 30 years the focus has changed slightly (from SBS to asthma, from chemicals to microbials and back), but basically the same topics have been discussed. So where do we stand today? What are the new frontiers? To learn more about where we stand today, you should read the proceedings from the Indoor Air 2008 conference. You can soon read about it in scientific journals (with the best and most important articles published in Indoor Air). Some personal thoughts: Indoor air matters, being by far the most important exposure! We do not know the indoor air-related factors responsible for health problems, e.g. sick building syndrome (SBS), asthma and allergies. IAQ matters! There is an enormous amount of literature showing that pollutants in indoor air have an effect on health. Ventilation matters! The literature is not overwhelming, but exists to indicate that ventilation (outdoor air supply) is important to address a number of health concerns. Basically, the more the ventilation, the better (a reason why we like it outdoors)! Organic compounds matter, but not TVOC, or many commonly measured VOCs! What we have measured are often the most stable compounds, while unstable (reactive) compounds are more interesting from the point of view of health. Dampness, while still an undefined problem, can be linked to health problems. Is the association between dampness and health due to mould? New air-cleaning technology is needed. The existing technology is often a major source of pollutants! Indoor air chemistry is important, e.g. reactions between ozone and terpenes. This is often missed out during the measurement of VOCs! ‘Modern’ chemicals like plasticizers, flame retardants, pesticides, etc. are linked to ‘modern’ medical conditions such as asthma, allergies, obesity, neurodevelopmental disorders, reduced semen quality, etc. There are too many CFD papers (dealing with simple cases) that do not offer practical applications. These are my personal thoughts, and I look forward to your responses (perhaps with a Letter to the Editor)! We are still working within a ‘young’ science!
-
Volatile organic compounds emitted by humans indoors– A review on the measurement, test conditions, and analysis techniques
Peter. J Irga,Gabrielle Mullen,Robert Fleck,Stephen Matheson,Sara. J Wilkinson,Fraser. R Torpy,P.J. Irga,G. Mullen,R. Fleck,S. Matheson,S. Wilkinson,F.R. Torpy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111442
IF: 7.093
2024-03-26
Building and Environment
Abstract:The impact of indoor air quality on human health is gaining importance as people spend 90% of their time indoors. It has been established that human occupancy is a significant contributor to indoor Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) concentrations and is of significant concern regarding occupant health, and yet human VOC emissions remain largely uncharacterised. In the current study, we review recent research that examines the contributions of humans to the indoor VOC profile in occupied spaces, with a focus on study characteristics. This investigation identified a hierarchy of factors contributing to inter-study variations in human biogenic VOC (HVOC) levels measured indoors. We found that the factors contributing to the variation in reported HVOC emissions are related to the sampling techniques used, the test conditions, occupant related factors sample analysis. Contrasting findings on issues such as the effect of nutrition and smoking are discussed. Conclusions were reached about the recent advancements and nature of results and the need to use larger datasets, and recommendations regarding global guidelines and future testing have been made. We advocate for a unified approach in future studies, promoting more coordinated data collection and reporting and fostering the development of impactful applications.
engineering, environmental,construction & building technology, civil
-
Volatile Organic Compounds: Do they present a risk to our health?
Krassi Rumchev,Helen Brown,Jeffery Spickett
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh.2007.22.1.39
2007-01-01
Reviews on Environmental Health
Abstract:Indoor air quality has been recognised as a significant health, environment, and economic issue in many countries. Research findings have demonstrated that some air pollutants occur more frequently and at a higher concentration in indoor air than in outdoor air, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In this context, the indoor environment can be of crucial importance because modem society spends most of their time indoors, and exposure to VOCs may result in a spectrum of illnesses ranging from mild, such as irritation, to very severe effects, including cancer. These effects have been seen at very low levels of exposure in many epidemiological studies. In this review, we discuss the nature of the VOCs that are ubiquitous in indoor environment and the evidence for adverse health effects associated with exposure to some of these compounds.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
-
Indoor Exposure to Selected Air Pollutants in the Home Environment: A Systematic Review
Sotiris Vardoulakis,Evanthia Giagloglou,Susanne Steinle,Alice Davis,Anne Sleeuwenhoek,Karen S. Galea,Ken Dixon,Joanne O. Crawford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238972
IF: 4.614
2020-12-02
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:(1) Background: There is increasing awareness that the quality of the indoor environment affects our health and well-being. Indoor air quality (IAQ) in particular has an impact on multiple health outcomes, including respiratory and cardiovascular illness, allergic symptoms, cancers, and premature mortality. (2) Methods: We carried out a global systematic literature review on indoor exposure to selected air pollutants associated with adverse health effects, and related household characteristics, seasonal influences and occupancy patterns. We screened records from six bibliographic databases: ABI/INFORM, Environment Abstracts, Pollution Abstracts, PubMed, ProQuest Biological and Health Professional, and Scopus. (3) Results: Information on indoor exposure levels and determinants, emission sources, and associated health effects was extracted from 141 studies from 29 countries. The most-studied pollutants were particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10); nitrogen dioxide (NO2); volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including benzene, toluene, xylenes and formaldehyde; and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) including naphthalene. Identified indoor PM2.5 sources include smoking, cooking, heating, use of incense, candles, and insecticides, while cleaning, housework, presence of pets and movement of people were the main sources of coarse particles. Outdoor air is a major PM2.5 source in rooms with natural ventilation in roadside households. Major sources of NO2 indoors are unvented gas heaters and cookers. Predictors of indoor NO2 are ventilation, season, and outdoor NO2 levels. VOCs are emitted from a wide range of indoor and outdoor sources, including smoking, solvent use, renovations, and household products. Formaldehyde levels are higher in newer houses and in the presence of new furniture, while PAH levels are higher in smoking households. High indoor particulate matter, NO2 and VOC levels were typically associated with respiratory symptoms, particularly asthma symptoms in children. (4) Conclusions: Household characteristics and occupant activities play a large role in indoor exposure, particularly cigarette smoking for PM2.5, gas appliances for NO2, and household products for VOCs and PAHs. Home location near high-traffic-density roads, redecoration, and small house size contribute to high indoor air pollution. In most studies, air exchange rates are negatively associated with indoor air pollution. These findings can inform interventions aiming to improve IAQ in residential properties in a variety of settings.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
-
Volatile Organic Compounds in Finnish Office Environments in 2010-2019 and Their Relevance to Adverse Health Effects
Kaisa Wallenius,Hanna Hovi,Jouko Remes,Selma Mahiout,Tuula Liukkonen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074411
2022-04-06
Abstract:We gathered recent (2010-2019) data on the VOC and formaldehyde levels in Finnish non-industrial indoor work environments. The data comprised 9789 VOC and 1711 formaldehyde samples collected from the indoor air of offices, schools, kindergartens, and healthcare offices. We assessed the health risks by comparing the measured concentrations to the health-based RW I/II and EU-LCI reference values. The concentrations of individual VOCs and formaldehyde in these work environments were generally very low and posed no health risks. Total VOC concentration (TVOC) as well as concentrations of several individual compounds, including aromatic compounds, alkanes, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, and formaldehyde, showed clearly decreasing trends. In contrast, several aldehydes, acids, and a few other compounds showed increasing trends. However, the increasing trends did not seem to affect the higher ends of the distributions, as the 95th percentile values remained fairly stable or decreased over the years. The VOC patterns in the environments of the offices, schools, kindergartens, and healthcare offices varied, probably reflecting the differences in typical activities and the use of materials. However, we do not expect these differences to be relevant to health outcomes.
-
An overview of health hazards of volatile organic compounds regulated as indoor air pollutants
Wen-Tien Tsai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2018-0046
2018-12-20
Reviews on Environmental Health
Abstract:Abstract Indoor air quality (IAQ) standards and guidelines for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been stipulated by various national and international agencies. The main purpose of this paper is to establish an overview of indoor VOCs regarding their impacts on human health. Herein, 13 VOCs were designated as indoor air pollutants (IAPs) in the IAQ standards and guidelines. They were further grouped into four types: nonchlorinated aromatic compounds, chlorinated aromatic compounds, chlorinated aliphatic compounds and aldehydes. For this purpose, the present study discusses the criteria for designating VOCs, and summarizes their main sources in indoor environments. Because the occupational exposure limit (OEL) in workplaces has often used as a preliminary basis for establishing acceptable health-based IAQ guidelines in buildings and residences, this paper thus reviews the OEL values, especially in the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)-threshold limit value (TLV). In addition, this paper also reviews the information about the classification of carcinogenicity in human by the international agencies for these VOCs. It shows that human tissues, including kidney, liver, leukemia, nasal cavity, paranasal sinus, liver and bile duct, could be more involved in the development of cancers or tumors when people are exposed to these VOCs through inhalation route in buildings over a long period of time.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
-
Ventilation Rates And Health: Multidisciplinary Review Of The Scientific Literature
J Sundell,H Levin,W W Nazaroff,W S Cain,W J Fisk,D T Grimsrud,F Gyntelberg,Y Li,A K Persily,A C Pickering,J M Samet,J D Spengler,S T Taylor,C J Weschler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00703.x
IF: 6.5539
2011-01-01
Indoor Air
Abstract:P>The scientific literature through 2005 on the effects of ventilation rates on health in indoor environments has been reviewed by a multidisciplinary group. The group judged 27 papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals as providing sufficient information on both ventilation rates and health effects to inform the relationship. Consistency was found across multiple investigations and different epidemiologic designs for different populations. Multiple health endpoints show similar relationships with ventilation rate. There is biological plausibility for an association of health outcomes with ventilation rates, although the literature does not provide clear evidence on particular agent(s) for the effects. Higher ventilation rates in offices, up to about 25 l/s per person, are associated with reduced prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms. The limited available data suggest that inflammation, respiratory infections, asthma symptoms and short-term sick leave increase with lower ventilation rates. Home ventilation rates above 0.5 air changes per hour (h-1) have been associated with a reduced risk of allergic manifestations among children in a Nordic climate. The need remains for more studies of the relationship between ventilation rates and health, especially in diverse climates, in locations with polluted outdoor air and in buildings other than offices.Practical ImplicationsVentilation with outdoor air plays an important role influencing human exposures to indoor pollutants. This review and assessment indicates that increasing ventilation rates above currently adopted standards and guidelines should result in reduced prevalence of negative health outcomes. Building operators and designers should avoid low ventilation rates unless alternative effective measures, such as source control or air cleaning, are employed to limit indoor pollutant levels.
-
Pulmonary Health Effects of Indoor Volatile Organic Compounds—A Meta-Analysis
Kyle L. Alford,Naresh Kumar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041578
IF: 4.614
2021-02-07
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are commonly found in consumer products, including furniture, sealants and paints. Thus, indoor VOCs have become a public health concern, especially in high-income countries (HICs), where people spend most of their time indoors, and indoor and outdoor air exchange is minimal due to a lack of ventilation. VOCs produce high levels of reaction with the airway epithelium and mucosa membrane and is linked with pulmonary diseases. This paper takes a stock of the literature to assess the strength of association (measured by effect size) between VOCs and pulmonary diseases with the focus on asthma and its related symptoms by conducting a meta-analysis. The literature was searched using the PubMed database. A total of 49 studies that measured VOCs or VOC types and pulmonary health outcomes were included in the analysis. The results of these studies were tabulated, and standard effect size of each study was computed. Most studies were conducted in high-income countries, including France (n = 7), Japan (n = 7) and the United States (n = 6). Our analysis suggests that VOCs have a medium-sized effect on pulmonary diseases, including the onset of asthma (effect size (or Cohen’s d) ~0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25–0.49; n = 23) and wheezing (effective size ~0.26; 95% CI = 0.10–0.42; n = 10). The effect size also varied by country, age and disease type. Multiple stakeholders must be engaged in strategies to mitigate and manage VOC exposure and its associated pulmonary disease burden.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
-
ASTHMA AND ALLERGY AMONG CHILDREN AND THE ASSOCIATION TO VENTILATION RATE AT HOME, A CASE CONTROL STUDY: ISEE-476
C G Bornehag,J Sundell,L Hägerhed
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200309001-00224
2003-01-01
Epidemiology
Abstract:Low ventilation rate have been shown to increase the risk for health and comfort problems in offices. However, very few studies have investigated the impact of ventilation rate at home on health effects, (Wargocki et al. 2002). The aim of this study was to investigate if low ventilation in homes increases the risk for asthma and other allergic symptoms among pre-school children in Sweden. The first step of the study “Dampness in Buildings and Health” started in March 2000 with a questionnaire investigation including all children (1–6y) in Värmland, Sweden (n = 14 077). The questionnaire included 84 questions concerning family background, symptoms among children and parents, home characteristics including dampness indications and food habits. Parents to 10 851 children responded the questionnaire, corresponding to a response rate of 79 %. In a second step 400 children were selected for a case-control study. The children were selected from the questionnaire data in the first step. Cases (n = 200) were children with at least two symptoms of three possible (i.e. wheezing, rhinitis and eczema). Controls (n = 200) were children without any symptoms at all. The 400 homes were investigated by professional inspectors and measurements were made of ventilation rate. Measurements were made with passive technique during one week during wintertime from October 2001 to April 2002. The 400 children lived in 352 single family houses (SH), (88 %) and in 45 multi family houses (MH), (11 %) and 3 children lived in other type of buildings. Valid samples for ventilation rate were collected for 396 children (198 cases and 198 controls). Mean values for ventilation rate were 0,37 Air Change Rate per Hour (ACRH) with significant differences (p < 0.001) between SH and MH, (SH:0.36 and MH:0.48 ACRH respectively). Cases had lower mean ventilation rate than controls, (0.36 and 0.39 ACRH respectively), However, the difference were not significant (p = 0.13). When only children living in SH were included in the analysis (n = 349) there was significant (p < 0.05) lower ventilation rate among cases compared with controls (0.34 and 0.39 ACRH respectively). Furthermore, data on ventilation rate in single family houses were divided into quartiles: (0–25%, n = 87) 0.17 ACRH (min 0.05–max 0.24); (25–50%, n = 88) 0.29 ACRH (0.24–0.33); (50–75%, n = 87) 0.38 ACRH (0.33–0.44) and (75–100%, n = 87) 0.62 ACRH (0.44–1.43). Logistic regression indicated a dose response relationship when the highest quartile was used as reference: (0–25% quartile) OR 1.92 (1.05–3.50); (25–50% quartile) OR 1.49 (0.82–2.70); (50–75% quartile) OR 1.39 (0.76–2.53). Concerning multi family houses no difference in ventilation rate was found between cases and controls.
-
Low-cost sensor-based investigation of CO 2 and volatile organic compounds in classrooms: Exploring dynamics, ventilation effects and perceived air quality relations
Sara Bjerre Sørensen,Kasper Kristensen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111369
IF: 7.093
2024-03-03
Building and Environment
Abstract:Poor classroom air quality (CAQ) can have negative impacts on student health, well-being and performance. Although CO 2 concentrations are the proxy most often applied when assessing classroom ventilation and air quality, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are important contributors to classroom air pollution. However, little is known about the sources and dynamics of VOCs in classrooms and its relation to classroom occupancy, ventilation and perceived air quality. In this study, CAQ was investigated in 75 Danish classrooms throughout November 2021 using low-cost sensors for continuous measurements of occupancy, CO 2 - and total volatile organic compound (TVOC) concentrations in conjunction with thermal desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry (TD-GC-MS) analysis of organic compounds. Measurements show significant increases in TVOC concentrations during school hours as well as a day-to-day increase in the morning TVOC levels from insufficient ventilation from preceding days. A weak (r = 0.21) but significant (p < 0.01) correlation was found between classroom CO 2 and TVOC. However, unlike the CO 2 concentrations, TVOC concentrations were affected by episodic emissions from classroom activities. Ventilation type was identified as a key factor influencing both CO 2 - and TVOC levels. Although mechanically ventilated classrooms experienced significantly lower CO 2 - and TVOC levels compared to naturally ventilated classrooms, all classrooms exceeded guideline values of 1000 ppm CO 2 with 70% of the classrooms exceeding this more than half of the occupied time. In contrast to CO 2 , a positive correlation ( ρ = 0.35, p = 0.006) was identified between the median TVOC concentrations during occupancy and the reported perceived CAQ.
engineering, environmental,construction & building technology, civil
-
Volatile Organic Compounds Emission from Building Sector and Its Adverse Effects on Human Health
Zaiema Rouf,Idrees Yousuf Dar,Maheen Javaid,Mohmad Younis Dar,Arshid Jehangir
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76073-1_5
2021-08-08
Abstract:The volatile organic compounds (VOCs)Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from building sectorBuilding sector include aliphatic hydrocarbons, halo-hydrocarbons, and aromatic hydrocarbons. The recent research findings conducted in the non-residential indoor environmentsIndoor environment have demonstrated that the concentration of indoor VOCVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) often exceeds the outdoor concentrations. The recent evidence insinuates that the significant amount of VOCs can clearly have both acute and chronic adverse effects on human well-being including cardiovascular and nervous system, increased mortality, etc., and may even cause cancer. Furthermore, VOCs have a significant effect in “sick building syndrome” reported by the WHO. Volatile organic compounds generally occur as liquids or as vapours at normal room temperature but may also exist in solid form such as bathroom deodorants, dichlorobenzene, naphthalene, and para-mothballs. Due to the presence of plenty of VOCsVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) it is not practicable to handle all the compounds and their toxicity. It is evident that while hundreds of VOCs may exist in any type of environment, the substantial health effects of the exposure of VOCsVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are yet to be identified. Thus to improve the air quality of the indoor building environment it is mandatory to expertise the better understanding of the mechanism and basic characteristics of VOCVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) generation from the building sectorsBuilding sector and construction materials.