Experimental Research of the Horizontal Tube Falling Film Flow Patterns—transitional Flow Patterns and Critical Transition Re

Xingsen Mu,Shun Hu,Xiaowen Nie,Jiali Wu,Shanlin Liu,Shengqiang Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.28489
IF: 1.1
2022-01-01
Desalination and Water Treatment
Abstract:The flow pattern of the fluid between the horizontal tubes is one of the important factors that affects the heat and mass transfer efficiency during the process of the horizontal tube falling film flow, and it is worthy of attention to optimize the performance of the horizontal tube falling film evaporator. The flow patterns of three fluids of water, ethanol, and 30% glycerol/water solution under the conditions of different tube spacings and two different tube diameters are observed by building a horizontal tube falling film flow experiment platform. Also, four new critical flow patterns are proposed and defined to further clarify the judgment basis of the flow pattern transition. The influence law of different parameters on the flow pattern transition between horizontal tubes is generalized by analyzing the transition mechanism of the flow patterns between tubes. The results of the experiment and analysis show that: The "critical separation length" is the distance sign that there are droplets generating during the process of falling film flow between tubes. That is, the flow patterns are the column flow or the sheet flow when the tube spacing is shorter than the "critical separation length". The larger the tube spacing, the larger the drop-column transition Re number. At the same time, the growth rate of the critical transition Re number will decrease with the increase of the tube spacing, and the growth rate of the pre-critical transition Re number of the drop- column flow is smaller than the growth rate of the post-critical transition Re number of the drop-column flow. The pre-critical transition Re number of the column-sheet flow does not change significantly with the tube spacing, but the post-critical transition Re number of the column-sheet flow increases with the increase of the tube spacing. The Re number interval of the column-sheet flow is generally larger than that of the drop-column flow at every tube spacing. The tube diameter has no significant effect on the flow pattern transition under the experimental condition. Water and 30% glycerol/water solution show similar critical transition Re numbers, and the critical transition Re number of ethanol is smaller obv iously.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?