Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Hydrothermal Sludge with Food Waste: Effects of Mixing Ratios and Fermentation Temperature

Penghui Chen,Yonghui Zheng,Zhengran Ren,xueling ran,Enzhen Wang,Jianbin Guo,Renjie Dong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4308187

2022-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:At present, the treatment of sewage sludge by thermal hydrolysis process has been widely used in large-scale wastewater treatment plants. However, there are still some problems, including the risk of ammonia inhibition and low productivity caused by insufficient nutrition of sludge. It is generally believed that high temperature can effectively increase the biochemical reaction rate, and thermophilic digestion of hydrothermal sludge is worth considering because of its high temperature. On this basis, the effects of five mixing ratios (100:0, 75:25, 50:50,25:75, 0:100) and two fermentation temperatures (40℃, 55℃) on anaerobic co-digestion of hydrothermal sludge and food waste were studied systematically. It was found that the anaerobic co-digestion of hydrothermal sludge and food waste had synergistic effect at any mixing ratio, and the improvement of carbohydrate removal was the main reason for the synergistic effect of AcoD. However, thermophilic digestion cannot improve the performance of anaerobic co-digestion. On the contrary, mesophilic digestion had better performance in organic matter removal, especially in the utilization and transformation of soluble organic matter, which made the methane yield of mesophilic digestion superior to thermophilic digestion. The microbial community analysis showed that the methanogenic pathway gradually changed from acetoclastic methanogenesis and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis to a single hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis type when anaerobic co-digestion changed from mesophilic to thermophilic, and the microbial community diversity in mesophilic digestion was better. Finally, it is suggested that the ratio of about 50:50 of hydrothermal sludge and food waste mixed and anaerobic digestion at mesophilic rather than thermophilic was a better choice.