Abstract:Problem definition: Firms heavily invest in big data technologies to collect consumer data and infer consumer preferences for price discrimination. However, consumers can use technological devices to manipulate their data and fool firms to obtain better deals. We examine how a firm invests in collecting consumer data and makes pricing decisions and whether it should disclose its scope of data collection to consumers who can manipulate their data. Methodology/results: We develop a game-theoretic model to consider a market in which a firm caters to consumers with heterogeneous preferences for a product. The firm collects consumer data to identify their types and issue an individualized price, whereas consumers can incur a cost to manipulate data and mimic the other type. We find that when the firm does not disclose its scope of data collection to consumers, it collects more consumer data. When the firm discloses its scope of data collection, it reduces data collection even when collecting more data is costless. The optimal scope of data collection increases when it is more costly for consumers to manipulate data but decreases when consumer demand becomes more heterogeneous. Moreover, a lower cost for consumers to manipulate data can be detrimental to both the firm and consumers. Lastly, disclosure of data collection scope increases firm profit, consumer surplus, and social welfare. Managerial implications: Our findings suggest that a firm should adjust its scope of data collection and prices based on whether the firm discloses the data collection scope, consumers’ manipulation cost, and demand heterogeneity. Public policies should require firms to disclose their data collection scope to increase consumer surplus and social welfare. Even without such a mandatory disclosure policy, firms should voluntarily disclose their data collection scope to increase profit. Moreover, public educational programs that train consumers to manipulate their data or raise their awareness of manipulation tools can ultimately hurt consumers and firms.

Regulating the Collection of Data As A Factor of Production: an Economic Analysis

Economical Behavior Modeling and Analyses for Data Collection in Edge Internet of Things Networks

Data Privacy: from Transparency to Fairness

Consumer Data Collection Strategies in Two-Sided Platforms: The Role of Data Ownership Assignment and Privacy Concerns

Beating the Algorithm: Consumer Manipulation, Personalized Pricing, and Big Data Management

Digital firm regulation strategy with privacy data protection costs

How to monetize data: An economic analysis of data monetization strategies under competition

The non-rivalry of data, directed technical change and the environment: A theoretical study incorporating data as a production factor

Privacy or Utility in Data Collection? A Contract Theoretic Approach

Privacy and personal data collection with information externalities

Socially Privacy-Preserving Data Collection for Crowdsensing

Game Theoretic Data Privacy Preservation: Equilibrium And Pricing

A Privacy Protection Model of Data Publication Based on Game Theory

Regulating the Use of Big Data: Justifications, Perspectives and the Chinese Way Forward

Data, Privacy Laws and Firm Production: Evidence from the GDPR

Contract-Based Private Data Collecting

The Effects of Personal Data Management on Competition and Welfare

Privacy-Preserving Data Collecting: A Simple Game Theoretic Approach

The Economics of Digital Privacy

Data Policy Restrictions and Cross-border E-commerce: Evidence from China

Knowledge Accumulation, Privacy, and Growth in a Data Economy