Satellite-derived Local Air Pollution Impacts of the Household ‘Coal-to-clean Energy’ Program in Beijing

Martha Lee,Mark Goldberg,Alexandra Schmidt,Guofeng Shen,Shu Tao,Jill Baumgartner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2022.p-0219
2022-01-01
ISEE Conference Abstracts
Abstract:Background: In 2015 Beijing started a coal-to-clean energy program that banned coal stoves and subsidized electric- or gas-powered heaters and electricity costs in thousands of peri-urban villages. Our objective was to estimate the effect of this program on satellite-derived PM₂.₅. Method: We geolocated villages in Beijing and assigned participation status in the program between 2015 and 2018. Average monthly outdoor PM₂.₅ data at a spatial resolution of 0.01°x0.01° grid cell were obtained for heating months (Dec-Feb) from Dec. 2014 to Dec. 2018. We estimated the number of households in each grid cell participating in the program ('treated') for each study month. We used a Bayesian spatiotemporal model to estimate the local effect of household participation in the program on satellite-derived PM₂.₅, adjusting for meteorological conditions (temperature/RH, precipitation, and wind vectors), elevation, imperious surface, presence of villages, and eligibility to participate in the program. We assessed linearity using linear splines. Results: In the 1768 grid cells with at least one village participating in the program by the end of 2018 (out of 17353 grid cells total), the number of treated households ranged from 1-5290 (median: 155). We observed a small but consistent effect of participating in the coal-to-clean energy program on decreases in local PM₂.₅ whereby for every 10 households treated there was an accompanying 0.03μg/m³ decrease [95%CI:-0.04,-0.02] in grid-cell PM₂.₅ up to 155 households. There was no effect of treatment on PM₂.₅ in grid cells with over 155 treated households. Conclusion: In less-populated areas, we observed modest reductions in satellite-derived outdoor PM₂.₅ at the grid cell level in Beijing after participation in the program. The lack of effect in areas with households is likely due to the presence of other sources of local outdoor PM₂.₅ that masks any PM₂.₅ benefit of the program. Keywords: Outdoor air pollution; residential coal burning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?