The effects of left bundle branch pacing on mechanical synchrony and myocardial work in bradycardia patients

PeiWei Wang,Li Yang,ShaoXin Zheng,JingTing Mai,YuLing Wei,YingMei Liu,BingQing Deng,HanLu Lv,YangXin Chen,Qiong Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2099640/v1
2022-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as a novel physiological pacing method to produce narrower QRS duration, but whether it could restore mechanical synchronization and improve myocardial work still lacks sufficient evidence. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate mechanical synchrony and myocardial work in LBBP. We collected 32 patients with LBBP due to symptomatic bradycardia in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from December 2018 to July 2020. Another 29 matched patients with right ventricular pacing (RVP) during the same period were also included as a control group. In the LBBP group, cardiac electro-mechanical synchrony and myocardial work were measured at baseline and 7 days after implantation, and compared with the RVP group. In the LBBP group, paced QRS duration, peak strain dispersion (PSD), and inter-ventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) were not significantly different from baseline(all P>0.05), but significantly smaller than that in the RVP group (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, GLS was greater in LBBP than in the RVP group (17.6±3.4% vs. 14.8±3.1%, P<0.05). Global myocardial work index and global constructive work were also better than that in the RVP group(all P<0.05). Global work efficiency was 92.5±3.0%, which was greater when compared with RVP ( 88.6±4.3 %, P<0.05). LBBP provides better cardiac electro-mechanical synchrony and more effective myocardial work than that in RVP, thus improving global heart function.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?