Male Iodine Status and Fecundity: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study on Fertile Couples in China

Yadong Li,Shangming Wang,Shuping Sang,Fang Lyu,Bin Zhang,Ruihao Xu,Zhe Zhang,Bin Wu,Miao Liu,Ning Wang,Shuangjie Wang,Shu-Cheng Zhang,Yi-hua Gu,Hui-Juan Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4326615
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To retrospectively study the association between male iodine status and fecundity. Design: Population-based retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting: 7 geographic areas in Northeast, North, South, East, West, and Central China from 2013 to 2018.Population: Fertile heterosexual couples who conceived within the past 3 months before recruitment in the study.Methods: Questionnaires for couples, semen and spot urine samples of males were collected, semen parameters were examined, and urinary iodine concentration (UIC) was determined as a biomarker of iodine status. Logistic regression model was employed to calculate fecundability odds ratios (FORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and to study the association between male iodine status and fecundability. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze couple’s time to pregnancy with response to male iodine status. Main outcome measures: Fecundability. Results: 1132 fertile couples were included in this study. 25.4% of male UICs are iodine deficiency (<99μg/l) and 15.8% of them are excessive (≥300μg/l). Among these fertile couples, the adjusted FORs of couples with optimal UICs in male partners are significantly higher than those whose UIC less than 50μg/l (FOR=0.468; 95% CI, 0.349-0.629; P=0.000); 50-99μg/l (FOR=0.462; 95% CI, 0.381-0.560; P=0.000), greater than 300μg/l (FOR= 0.503; 95% CI, 0.414-0.611; P=0.000), and slightly higher than 200-200 (FOR=0.898; 95% CI, 0.764-1.055; P=0.191) without statistical significance.Conclusion: A U-shaped relationship existed between iodine status of male partners and reduced couple fecundity. An UIC between 100 and 299 ug/L is safe for reproduction of fertile man.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?