Decarbonization of Ironmaking Through Power to Gas and Oxy-Fuel Combustion

Manuel Bailera,Takao Nakagaki,Irmela Kofler,Luis M Romeo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4271996

2022-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This article compares 3 Power to Gas integrations for oxygen blast furnaces, in which synthetic natural gas replaces coke. The 3 integrations differ on the type of gas consumed in methanation: (a) pure CO2, (b) treated BFG, or (c) BFG. These configurations are compared by using 17 key performance indicators. The blast furnace is modelled using the Rist diagram. In case (a), the maximum electrolysis capacity is 0.77 MW/(tHM/h), which would correspond to 424 MW for a blast furnace producing 550 tHM/h. In case (b), the maximum electrolysis capacity is 0.54 MW/(tHM/h), corresponding to 297 MW. In case (c), the electrolysis capacity is limited to 0.62 MW/(tHM/h), which translates into 342 MW for the mentioned size of blast furnace. In the three cases, the total CO2 emissions are around 1042 kg/tHM, representing that CO2 has been cut by 10% with respect to the emissions of the base case (which are 1162 kg/tHM). The energy penalization of CO2 avoidance is 18.9 MJ/kgCO2 for case (a), 11.8 MJ/kgCO2 for (b) and 13.8 MJ/kgCO2 for case (c). This means that the energy penalization can be decreased by 37.6% just by selecting the most convenient configuration of integration. Despite the proposed integration has energy penalizations greater than conventional amine carbon capture (typically 4.8 MJ/kgCO2), it could reduce in return the economic costs thanks to diminishing the coke consumption, reducing the electricity consumption in the air separation unit, and eliminating the requirement of geological storage for the avoided CO2.