Abstract:The arms race between attacks and defenses for machine learning models has come to a forefront in recent years, in both the security community and the privacy community. However, one big limitation of previous research is that the security domain and the privacy domain have typically been considered separately. It is thus unclear whether the defense methods in one domain will have any unexpected impact on the other domain. In this paper, we take a step towards resolving this limitation by combining the two domains. In particular, we measure the success of membership inference attacks against six state-of-the-art defense methods that mitigate the risk of adversarial examples (i.e., evasion attacks). Membership inference attacks determine whether or not an individual data record has been part of a model's training set. The accuracy of such attacks reflects the information leakage of training algorithms about individual members of the training set. Adversarial defense methods against adversarial examples influence the model's decision boundaries such that model predictions remain unchanged for a small area around each input. However, this objective is optimized on training data. Thus, individual data records in the training set have a significant influence on robust models. This makes the models more vulnerable to inference attacks. To perform the membership inference attacks, we leverage the existing inference methods that exploit model predictions. We also propose two new inference methods that exploit structural properties of robust models on adversarially perturbed data. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that compared with the natural training (undefended) approach, adversarial defense methods can indeed increase the target model's risk against membership inference attacks. When using adversarial defenses to train the robust models, the membership inference advantage increases by up to 4.5 times compared to the naturally undefended models. Beyond revealing the privacy risks of adversarial defenses, we further investigate the factors, such as model capacity, that influence the membership information leakage.

Adversarial Perturbation for Privacy Preservation

Adversarial for Good – Defending Training Data Privacy with Adversarial Attack Wisdom

Adversarial Examples: Opportunities and Challenges

Adversarial Learning of Privacy-Preserving and Task-Oriented Representations

Adversarial Examples in Deep Learning: Characterization and Divergence

Multifunctional Adversarial Examples: A Novel Mechanism for Authenticatable Privacy Protection of Images

Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

Exploiting vulnerabilities of deep neural networks for privacy protection

Hiding Visual Information via Obfuscating Adversarial Perturbations

RAE-TPE: A Reversible Adversarial Example Generation Method Based on Thumbnail Preserving Encryption

Visual Analysis of Adversarial Examples in Machine Learning

Discriminative Adversarial Privacy: Balancing Accuracy and Membership Privacy in Neural Networks

Privacy-Preserving Adversarial Networks

A Survey of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Neural Network in Computer Vision

Towards Privacy-Preserving Visual Recognition via Adversarial Training: A Pilot Study

Adversarial Examples on Object Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey

Adversarial Image Perturbation for Privacy Protection -- A Game Theory Perspective

Privacy Adversarial Network: Representation Learning for Mobile Data Privacy

A Survey of Defense Methods Against Adversarial Examples

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Deep Learning: From a Perspective of Cybersecurity

Adversarial Robust Safeguard for Evading Deep Facial Manipulation