Abstract:Model validation is the most important part of building a supervised model. For building a model with good generalization performance one must have a sensible data splitting strategy, and this is crucial for model validation. In this study, we conducted a comparative study on various reported data splitting methods. The MixSim model was employed to generate nine simulated datasets with different probabilities of mis-classification and variable sample sizes. Then partial least squares for discriminant analysis and support vector machines for classification were applied to these datasets. Data splitting methods tested included variants of cross-validation, bootstrapping, bootstrapped Latin partition, Kennard-Stone algorithm (K-S) and sample set partitioning based on joint X–Y distances algorithm (SPXY). These methods were employed to split the data into training and validation sets. The estimated generalization performances from the validation sets were then compared with the ones obtained from the blind test sets which were generated from the same distribution but were unseen by the training/validation procedure used in model construction. The results showed that the size of the data is the deciding factor for the qualities of the generalization performance estimated from the validation set. We found that there was a significant gap between the performance estimated from the validation set and the one from the test set for the all the data splitting methods employed on small datasets. Such disparity decreased when more samples were available for training/validation, and this is because the models were then moving towards approximations of the central limit theory for the simulated datasets used. We also found that having too many or too few samples in the training set had a negative effect on the estimated model performance, suggesting that it is necessary to have a good balance between the sizes of training set and validation set to have a reliable estimation of model performance. We also found that systematic sampling method such as K-S and SPXY generally had very poor estimation of the model performance, most likely due to the fact that they are designed to take the most representative samples first and thus left a rather poorly representative sample set for model performance estimation.

Learning a Model with the Most Generality for Small-Sample Problems.

A Survey of Learning on Small Data: Generalization, Optimization, and Challenge

Research on the Generalization Problem of BP Neural Network

Modeling Generalization in Machine Learning: A Methodological and Computational Study

A model robust sub-sampling approach for Generalised Linear Models in Big data settings

Heuristic improvement for active learning using localized generalization error as selection criterion

Model Recognition Orientated at Small Sample Data

Multi-Level Fine-Tuning: Closing Generalization Gaps in Approximation of Solution Maps under a Limited Budget for Training Data

On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minima

Machine Learning vs Deep Learning: The Generalization Problem

Localized Generalization Error And Its Application To Rbfnn Training

Constructing Confidence Intervals for 'the' Generalization Error -- a Comprehensive Benchmark Study

Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influence

The Generalization Performance of Regularized Regression Algorithms Based on Markov Sampling

Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model

Model-free Subsampling Method Based on Uniform Designs

On Generalization Error Bounds of Noisy Gradient Methods for Non-Convex Learning

On Splitting Training and Validation Set: A Comparative Study of Cross-Validation, Bootstrap and Systematic Sampling for Estimating the Generalization Performance of Supervised Learning

Embedding generalization within the learning dynamics: An approach based-on sample path large deviation theory

Stable Minima Cannot Overfit in Univariate ReLU Networks: Generalization by Large Step Sizes

Finding Generalization Measures by Contrasting Signal and Noise.