Abstract:This work considers the sample and computational complexity of obtaining an $\epsilon$-optimal policy in a discounted Markov Decision Process (MDP), given only access to a generative model. In this work, we study the effectiveness of the most natural plug-in approach to model-based planning: we build the maximum likelihood estimate of the transition model in the MDP from observations and then find an optimal policy in this empirical MDP. We ask arguably the most basic and unresolved question in model based planning: is the naive "plug-in" approach, non-asymptotically, minimax optimal in the quality of the policy it finds, given a fixed sample size? Here, the non-asymptotic regime refers to when the sample size is sublinear in the model size. With access to a generative model, we resolve this question in the strongest possible sense: our main result shows that \emph{any} high accuracy solution in the plug-in model constructed with $N$ samples, provides an $\epsilon$-optimal policy in the true underlying MDP (where $\epsilon$ is the minimax accuracy with $N$ samples at every state, action pair). In comparison, all prior (non-asymptotically) minimax optimal results use model free approaches, such as the Variance Reduced Q-value iteration algorithm (Sidford et al 2018), while the best known model-based results (e.g. Azar et al 2013) require larger sample sizes in their dependence on the planning horizon or the state space. Notably, we show that the model-based approach allows the use of \emph{any} efficient planning algorithm in the empirical MDP, which simplifies algorithm design as this approach does not tie the algorithm to the sampling procedure. The core of our analysis is avnovel "absorbing MDP" construction to address the statistical dependency issues that arise in the analysis of model-based planning approaches, a construction which may be helpful more generally.

Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model

Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Linearly-Parameterized MDPs with a Generative Model

Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimal

Generative Adversarial Imagination for Sample Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning

Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning Is Feasible for Linearly Realizable MDPs with Limited Revisiting

Algorithmic Framework for Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guarantees

KL-Entropy-Regularized RL with a Generative Model is Minimax Optimal

Near-Minimax-Optimal Distributional Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model

Breaking the sample complexity barrier to regret-optimal model-free reinforcement learning

Model-Assisted Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Ensemble Value Expansion

An Exponential Lower Bound for Linearly-Realizable MDPs with Constant Suboptimality Gap

Reinforcement Learning with Generative Models for Compact Support Sets

The Benefits of Model-Based Generalization in Reinforcement Learning

The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model

Settling the Sample Complexity of Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning

Deep Model-Based Reinforcement Learning for High-Dimensional Problems, a Survey

Sample Complexity of Robust Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model

High-accuracy model-based reinforcement learning, a survey

Prioritized Generative Replay

Gaussian Processes for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning with RMAX-like Exploration

Model-Free Reinforcement Learning: from Clipped Pseudo-Regret to Sample Complexity