A Multi-Lingual Contrastive Study of the Chinese-men Chinese Full Text

苏佳佳,王文斌
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2023.03.017
2023-01-01
Abstract:Previous studies investigating whether or not the Chinese-men is a plural marker usually take the English plural suffix-s as the reference by default. However,descriptions of the distribution and the semantics of-s are not sufficient in these studies,and a basic fact that is not taken into consideration is that Chinese is a classifier language. By contrasting Chinese with English and other 6 classifier languages in the world,the present study found that:1) plural morphology is not always associated with plural meaning in English, thus-s should not be considered to be a standard reference in deciding whether or not-men is a plural marker;and 2) though essentially different from the English-s,the Chinese-men shares many features with plural markers in other classifier languages. This study intends to provide a wider perspective for the further discussion of-men, a deeper examination of the similarities and differences between the Chinese-men and the English-s,a clearer identification of the grammatical role of the Chinese-men,and a better understanding of the basic features of plural markers existing in the other 6 classifier languages.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?