Abstract:Since 2008, China has established innovative pilot cities in batches, with green and low-carbon principles and objectives as the core of the NICP policy. Therefore, it is of great significance to accurately evaluate the driving effect of the NICP policy on low-carbon technology innovation, to expand the coverage of pilot cities in a prudent and orderly manner. The research focuses on the economic and environmental potential of the national innovative city pilot (NICP) policy. However, the relationship between the NICP policy and low-carbon technology innovation remains to be examined. This article employs a sample of 274 prefecture-level cities in China spanning the years 2003 to 2020 for research purposes, and uses a series of methods such as time-varying DID and intermediary effect models to examine the impelling impact and intricate workings of the NICP policy on low-carbon technology innovation. The study found that: (i) The NICP policy possesses the potential to impel innovation in low-carbon technology, and the impact of the policy exhibits a fluctuating yet upward trajectory over time. (ii) The NICP policy promotes low-carbon technology innovation through financial technology investment, population aggregation, and digital construction. (iii) The innovation effect of the NICP policy is significantly influenced by resource endowment and the disclosure of environmental information. The impact of the NICP policy on innovation in low-carbon technology is more pronounced in resource-based cities than non-resource-based cities, and it is particularly noteworthy in well-established resource-based cities with abundant resource endowments. The impetus generated by the NICP policy towards the innovation of low-carbon technology is notably more substantial for cities that exhibit elevated levels of environmental information disclosure. Local governments should implement active environmental information disclosure at the city level. This paper not only enriches the relevant research on low-carbon technology innovation but also provides empirical evidence for promoting the NICP policy nationwide. Additionally, it serves as a policy reference for creating innovative characteristic cities under the "dual carbon" goal.

Policy Complementary or Policy Crowding-Out? Effects of Cross-Instrumental Policy Mix on Green Innovation in China

The Impact of Innovative and Low-Carbon Pilot Cities on Green Innovation

Can a Policy Mix Achieve a Collaborative Effect? Exploring the Nested Implementation Process of Urban Carbon Emission Reduction Policies

From Innovation to Green: Does China's Innovative City Construction Contribute to Green Development?

Impact of low-carbon city pilot policies on urban green innovation from the perspective of spatial and temporal heterogeneity

Synergistic Impacts of Carbon Emission Trading Policy and Innovative City Pilot Policy on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency in China

Carbon intensity constraint policy and firm green innovation in China: a quasi-DID analysis

How the Pilot Low-Carbon City Policy Promotes Urban Green Innovation: Based on Temporal-Spatial Dual Perspectives

The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on urban green technology innovation: Based on government and public perspectives

Innovation or introduction? Impacts of the low-carbon city pilot policy on the pathways toward green technology progress

Does environmental regulation affect urban green technology innovation in China? Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot policy

The Effects of the Low-Carbon Pilot City Program on Green Innovation: Evidence from China

The Impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies on Green Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Cities: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Multi-Period PSM-DID Model

Can comprehensive environmental regulation trigger green innovation? evidence from the low-carbon city pilot policy and green patents of listed industrial enterprises

The effect of the policy mix of green credit and government subsidy on environmental innovation

Does innovative city pilot policy improve carbon reduction? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

How does innovative city policy break carbon lock-in? A spatial difference-in-differences analysis for China

Does the combination of low-carbon and innovative policies promote the high-quality development of enterprises?—A quasi-natural experiment based on the "dual pilot" of low carbon and innovation cities

The impact of the low-carbon city pilot policy on green innovation in firms

Convergence or dispersion? The impact of China’s innovative city pilot policy on regional innovation differences

Innovation-Driven Policy and Low-Carbon Technology Innovation: Research Driven by the Impetus of National Innovative City Pilot Policy in China