Abstract:Since 2008, China has established innovative pilot cities in batches, with green and low-carbon principles and objectives as the core of the NICP policy. Therefore, it is of great significance to accurately evaluate the driving effect of the NICP policy on low-carbon technology innovation, to expand the coverage of pilot cities in a prudent and orderly manner. The research focuses on the economic and environmental potential of the national innovative city pilot (NICP) policy. However, the relationship between the NICP policy and low-carbon technology innovation remains to be examined. This article employs a sample of 274 prefecture-level cities in China spanning the years 2003 to 2020 for research purposes, and uses a series of methods such as time-varying DID and intermediary effect models to examine the impelling impact and intricate workings of the NICP policy on low-carbon technology innovation. The study found that: (i) The NICP policy possesses the potential to impel innovation in low-carbon technology, and the impact of the policy exhibits a fluctuating yet upward trajectory over time. (ii) The NICP policy promotes low-carbon technology innovation through financial technology investment, population aggregation, and digital construction. (iii) The innovation effect of the NICP policy is significantly influenced by resource endowment and the disclosure of environmental information. The impact of the NICP policy on innovation in low-carbon technology is more pronounced in resource-based cities than non-resource-based cities, and it is particularly noteworthy in well-established resource-based cities with abundant resource endowments. The impetus generated by the NICP policy towards the innovation of low-carbon technology is notably more substantial for cities that exhibit elevated levels of environmental information disclosure. Local governments should implement active environmental information disclosure at the city level. This paper not only enriches the relevant research on low-carbon technology innovation but also provides empirical evidence for promoting the NICP policy nationwide. Additionally, it serves as a policy reference for creating innovative characteristic cities under the "dual carbon" goal.

How does innovative city policy break carbon lock-in? A spatial difference-in-differences analysis for China

Does innovative city pilot policy improve carbon reduction? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

How do intellectual property demonstration cities contribute to low-carbon development? Evidence from China

How can Chinese cities escape from carbon lock-in? The role of low-carbon city policy

Spatial spillover effects of a carbon trading policy on green technology innovation in China

How the Pilot Low-Carbon City Policy Promotes Urban Green Innovation: Based on Temporal-Spatial Dual Perspectives

Impact of low-carbon city pilot policies on urban green innovation from the perspective of spatial and temporal heterogeneity

Carbon intensity constraint policy and firm green innovation in China: a quasi-DID analysis

Research on the low-carbon effect of technological innovation

Do Urban Innovation Policies Reduce Carbon Emission? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities with DID

Innovation-Driven Policy and Low-Carbon Technology Innovation: Research Driven by the Impetus of National Innovative City Pilot Policy in China

Innovation city and low-carbon future: a quasinatural experiment from China

Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China

Can Innovation Agglomeration Reduce Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China

Carbon emission reduction effect of innovative city pilot policies in China: based on the staggered difference-in-difference model

Does Innovative City Policy Improve Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency? Evidence from China

Convergence or dispersion? The impact of China’s innovative city pilot policy on regional innovation differences

The spatial spillover effect of carbon emission trading scheme on green innovation in China's cities

From Innovation to Green: Does China's Innovative City Construction Contribute to Green Development?

The Effect of Smart City Policies on City Innovation—A Quasi-Natural Experiment from the Smart City Pilot Cities in China