Abstract:Objective: To assess the clinical impact of direct two-step distraction reduction (TSDR) for basilar invagination (BI) with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent TSDR and occipitocervical fusion in West China Hospital between October 2013 and March 2021. Depending on whether the preoperative decrease was greater than 50% on preoperative hyperextension X-rays, the patients were split into two groups. The neurological function [Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score], atlantodens interval (ADI), the distance of odontoid process beyond McRae Line (ML) and Wackenheim Line (WL), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), O-C2 angle (OC2A), and complications incidence were compared between two groups preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: There were 12 men and 23 women among the 35 patients with BI and AAD, and the age ranged from 28 to 71 years, with an mean age of (52.0±13.4) years. In the preoperative reduction ≥50% group, there were 4 males and 9 females with an average age of (54.0±13.8) years; in the preoperative reduction <50% group, there were 8 males and 14 females with a mean age of (50.9±13.4) years. All the patients were followed-up for a mean time of (23.3±13.4) months. There was no significant difference in age, gender, bleeding, length of hospital stay and follow-up time between the two groups (all P>0.05). The JOA score, ADI, WL, ML and CMA of 35 patients were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (all P<0.05). The reduction degree of ADI, ML and WL was more than 80% in 31 cases (88.57%), 30 cases (85.71%) and 31 cases (88.57%), respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative ADI, ML and WL between the two groups (all P>0.05). All patients had no incision infection, no loosening or breakage of the internal fixators. Dysphagia occurred in 3 patients, non-fusion happened in 1 patient, but no instability in X-ray of cervical dynamic position was found, no loosening or displacement occurred in internal fixators, and partial spontaneous fusion occurred between atlantoaxial lateral mass joints. Conclusions: For BI with AAD without atlantoaxial bony connection or serious atlantoaxial facet joint inclination, TSDR could obtain satisfactory reduction degree. The reduction degree on preoperative hyperextension X-ray doesn't affect the degree of intraoperative reduction.

Surgical outcomes of basilar invagination type B without atlantoaxial dislocation through simple posterior fossa decompression: a retrospective study of 18 cases

[Clinical Effect of Posterior Atlanto Axial Vertebra Internal Fixation for Treatment of Instability of Occipitocervical].

Biomechanical Comparison of Modified TARP Technique versus Modified Goel Technique for the Treatment of Basilar Invagination: A Finite Element Analysis.

A Staged Approach for Surgical Management of Basilar Invagination

Analysis of Failed Posterior Fossa Decompression and an Effective Revision Surgery in Patients with Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Bone Grafting of Atlantoaxial Joints and Occipitocervical or Atlantoaxial Fusion for the Reduction and Fixation of Basilar Invagination with Atlantoaxial Dislocation by A Posterior Approach: A Preliminary Study

Basilar Impression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Features, Operative Strategies and Outcomes

Cervicomedullary Angle As an Independent Radiological Predictor of Postoperative Neurological Outcome in Type A Basilar Invagination

Posterior Approach Two-Step Distraction Reduction and Occipitocervicalfusion for Basilar Invagination with Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Clinical features and outcomes of basilar invagination

Efficacy analysis of direct posterior reduction for the treatment of congenital basilar invagination complicated with atlantoaxial dislocation

Treatment of Primary Basilar Invagination by Cervical Traction and Posterior Instrumented Reduction Together with Occipitocervical Fusion

Evaluation of Craniometric Parameters and Efficacy of Posterior Surgical Intervention Types in Basilar Invagination Patients

Surgical Treatment of Chiari Malformation Complicated with Basilar Impression

Posterior Distraction Reduction and Occipitocervical Fixation for the Treatment of Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation.

Occipitocervical fusion combined with 3-dimensional navigation and 3-dimensional printing technology for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation with basilar invagination: A case report

Posterior Revision Surgery Using an Intraarticular Distraction Technique with Cage Grafting to Treat Atlantoaxial Dislocation Associated with Basilar Invagination.

Association Between the Clivus Slope and Patient-Reported Japanese Orthopaedic Association (PRO-JOA) Scores in Patients with Basilar Invagination: A Retrospective Study

[Direct Intraoperative Two-Step Distraction and Reduction for Basilar Invagination with Atlantoaxial Dislocation].

Combined anterioposteriorly approach to the basilar invagination complicated with the Chiari malformation

Posterior Two-Step Distraction and Reduction for Basilar Invagination with Atlantoaxial Dislocation: a Novel Technique for Precise Control of Reduction Degree Without Traction