A Corpus-Based Study of Refusal Strategies in Chinese Diplomatic Discourse Chinese Full Text

赵红霞,郭继荣,杨雨萌

2023-01-01

Abstract:Diplomatic discourse is an important part of national discourse,and is a typical expression of the national security concept in international discourse. An in-depth analysis of the discourse of Foreign Ministry spokespersons in response to journalists’ questions can help us understand China’s attitude and stance in major domestic and international affairs. This paper adopts a statistical and corpus analysis approach,based on a selfbuilt corpus of regular press conference texts,and guided by the theory of refusal strategies,to analyse the refusal strategies used by Foreign Ministry spokespersons and extract their related high-frequency linguistic forms with the help of the statistical software SPSS and Python. The paper also compares the findings with those of another researcher five years ago to observe the changing trends in the use of refusal strategies.Refusal strategies are divided into two categories:direct refusal and indirect refusal,and indirect refusal strategies consists of eight subcategories:offering alternative methods,giving reasons,obstructing the questioner,promising,statement of attitude,vague answers,partial answers and avoidance.The results show that:（1）Refusal strategies are usually used for three types of questions,namely transactional,opinion-based and confirmatory questions;furthermore,the type of questioning has a significant impact on the use of refusal strategies,with speakers less likely to use“direct refusal”and“promising”strategies.Spokespersons used refusal strategies more frequently when answering opinion-based questions than for confirmatory questions;（2）Spokespersons used more refusal strategies when answering journalists questions in 2021 than in 2017,which is closely related to the international public opinion environment China has faced at different times. When using the“providing alternative method”strategy,the high-frequency language form was“I would（+ like）refer you to + N. P.（+ for …questions/details）”,and when answering questions that required further confirmation,speakers usually take direct refusal strategy and avoidance strategy.“I don’t have any news/information to offer you …”and“I am not aware of XXX”appear more frequently. Attitude statements are typical when faced with opinion-based questions,so sentences such as“China firmly opposes XXX”or“the position on XXX is consistent and clear”are very commonly used;（3）The choice of refusal strategy is influenced by national political,economic and cultural security factors. Spokespersons often use the refusal strategy to respond to questions about wanton interference in China’s internal affairs in order to demonstrate their firm determination to safeguard national political security.Refusal strategies are always used to defend national economic interests and security by responding to questions that politicize economic and trade issues and smear China’s development achievements. In addition,the use of refusal strategy reflects China’s cultural values of‘comity’and‘integrity’. Confronted with a hegemonic culture and a complex international situation,spokespersons can adopt more direct refusal strategies to convey China’s firm position,safeguard national security and win the initiative in diplomatic discourse.