Analysis of detection of novel coronavirus-specific antibodies by different methods

WANG Qian,ZHANG Hua,YUAN Yu-hua
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the positive rates of different serological testing methods for the detection of new coronavirus-specific antibodies,and compare the differences between patients with new coronary pneumonia and those with asymptomatic infection.Methods:Five colloidal gold immunochromatographic detection reagents A,B,C,D,E and a magnetic particle chemiluminescence detection reagent F were used to test the serum samples of 10 confirmed patients and 11 asymptomatic infections in the hospital. Among them,A reagent was used to detect total antibody,B,C,D,E,F reagents were used to detect antibody IgM,C,D,E,F reagents were used to detect antibody IgG. According to the relevant provisions of the "New Coronary Pneumonia Diagnosis and Treatment Plan( Trial Seventh Edition) ",20 cases of patients who have been excluded from new coronavirus infection were used as blank controls,and the positive rate of antibodies IgM and Ig G was detected by different reagents in patients with new coronary pneumonia and asymptomatic infections were calculated and compared through statistical analysis.None of the subjects in the study had received the COVID-19 vaccine.Results:Total antibody:the positive detection rate of reagent A was 100%,which measured total antibody without distinguish between antibody IgM and IgG. Antibody IgM:10 patients with new coronary pneumonia and 11 patient with asymptomatic infection used methods B,C,D,E,and F to detect the positive rates of IgM antibodies,and the positive detection rate of different methods were statistically significant( P<0.05). In the new coronary pneumonia group and the asymptomatic infection group,the positive rate of the antibody IgM detected by the colloidal gold immunochromatographic method C,D,E was significantly lower than that of the magnetic particle chemiluminescence method F. Antibody IgG:the new coronary pneumonia group used methods C,D,E,and F to detect the positive rate of IgG antibodies,and the difference was not statistically significant( P>0.05),and the asymptomatic infection group used C,D,E,and F to detect IgG antibodies positive rate,the difference was statistically significant( P<0.05). Colloidal gold immunochromatographic methods D and E showed a lower positive test for antibody IgG than chemiluminescence method F in the asymptomatic infection group. Conclusion:Compared with the colloidal gold immunochromatographic method,the magnetic particle chemiluminescence method has a higher positive detection rate for detecting antibodies IgM in patients with new coronary pneumonia and antibodies IgM and IgG in asymptomatic infections. It is more helpful to distinguish past infection from current infection. However,it has higher requirements on detection conditions,and the detection time is relatively long. Colloidal gold immunochromatography has a fast detection speed,but its sensitivity is lower than that of magnetic particle chemiluminescence method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?