Diagnostic value of combined nucleic acid and antibody detection in suspected COVID-19 cases

Huadong Zeng,Shaodong Deng,Zhou Zhou,Xian Qiu,Xingwang Jia,Zhikui Li,Jun Wang,Honglu Duan,Li Tu,Junli Wang,H. Zeng,S. Deng,Z. Zhou,X. Qiu,X. Jia,Z. Li,J. Wang,H. Duan,L. Tu,J. Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.011
IF: 4.984
2020-09-01
Public Health
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objectives</h3><p>Nucleic acid testing is the gold-standard method for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, large numbers of false-negative results have been reported. In this study, nucleic acid detection and antibody detection (IgG and IgM) were combined in order to improve the testing accuracy of suspected COVID-19 patients.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Study design</h3><p>xxxx</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>A total of 71 suspected COVID-19 patients were selected to participate in this study, which included a retrospective analysis of clinical features, imaging examination, laboratory biochemical examination, and nucleic acid detection and specific antibody (IgM and IgG) detection.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The majority of participants with suspected COVID-19 presented with fever (67.61%) and cough (54.93%), and imaging results showed multiple small patches and ground-glass opacity in both lungs, with less common infiltration and consolidation opacity (23.94%). Routine blood tests were mostly normal (69.01%), while only a few patients had lymphopenia (4.23%) or leukopenia (12.68%). There was no statistical difference in the double-positive rate between nucleic acid detection (46.48%) and specific antibody (IgG and IgM) detection (42.25%) (P = 0.612); both of which were also poorly consistent with each other (Kappa = 0.231). The positive rate of combined nucleic acid detection and antibody detection (63.38%) was significantly increased, compared with that of nucleic acid detection (46.48%) and that of specific antibody (IgG and IgM) detection (42.25%), and the differences were statistically significant (P = 0.043 and P = 0.012, respectively).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>Nucleic acid detection and specific antibody (IgG and IgM) detection had similar positive rates, and their combination could improve the positive rate of COVID-19 detection, which is of great significance for diagnosis and epidemic control.</p>
public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?