Abstract:No AccessTechnical NotePerformance Impact of Manufacturing Variations for Multistage Steam TurbinesJing Yang, Juntao Xiong, Ivan McBean, Said Havakechian, Feng Liu and Jiaqi LuoJing YangPeking University, 100871 Beijing, China*Graduate Student, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics; .Search for more papers by this author, Juntao XiongUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697†Research Fellow, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this author, Ivan McBeanGE Power, 5401 Baden, Switzerland‡.Search for more papers by this author, Said HavakechianGE Power, 5401 Baden, Switzerland§.Search for more papers by this author, Feng LiuUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697¶Professor, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; . Fellow AIAA.Search for more papers by this author and Jiaqi LuoPeking University, 100871 Beijing, China**Research Associate, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:3 Mar 2017https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36022SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Bammert K. and Sandstede H., “Influences of Manufacturing Tolerances and Surface Roughness of Blades on the Performance of Turbines,” Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 98, No. 1, 1976, pp. 29–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3446107 JEPOA8 0022-0825 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Bunker R., “The Effects of Manufacturing Tolerances on Gas Turbine Cooling,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 131, No. 4, 2009, Paper 041018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3072494 JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[3] Goodhand M. N. and Miller R. J., “The Impact of Real Geometries on Three-Dimensional Separations in Compressors,” American Soc. of Mechanical Engineers Paper GT2010-22246, Fairfield, NJ, June 2010. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Garzon V. E. and Darmofal D. L., “Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performace,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 125, No. 4, Oct. 2003, pp. 692–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1622715 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Duffner J. D., “The Effects of Manufacturing Variability on Turbine Vane Performance,” M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2008. Google Scholar[6] Jameson A., “Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory,” Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1988, pp. 233–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061285 JSCOEB 0885-7474 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Giebmanns A., Backhaus J., Frey C. and Schnell R., “Compressor Leading Edge Sensitivities and Analysis with an Adjoint Flow Solver,” American Soc. of Mechanical Engineers Paper GT2013-94427, Fairfield, NJ, June 2013. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Marta A. C. and Shankaran S., “Assessing Turbomachinery Performance Sensitivity to Boundary Conditions Using Control Theory,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2014, pp. 1281–1294. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35087 JPPOEL 0748-4658 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Zamboni G., Banks G. and Bather S., “Gradient-Based Adjoint and Design of Experiment CFD Methodologies to Improve the Manufacturability of High Pressure Turbine Blades,” American Soc. of Mechanical Engineers Paper GT2016-56042, Fairfield, NJ, 2016. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Luo J., Xiong J., Liu F. and Mcbean I., “Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Turbine Blade by Using an Adjoint Method,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 133, No. 1, 2011, Paper 011026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001166 JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[11] Luo J., Zhou C. and Liu F., “Multipoint Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Blade by Using an Adjoint Method,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 136, No. 5, 2014, Paper 051005. JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Luo J., Liu F. and Mcbean I., “Turbine Blade Row Optimization Through Endwall Contouring by an Adjoint Method,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2015, pp. 505–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35152 JPPOEL 0748-4658 LinkGoogle Scholar[13] Luo J. and Liu F., “Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor Using an Adjoint Equation Method,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2015, pp. 797–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053436 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Liu F. and Jameson A., “Multigrid Navier–Stokes Calculations for Three-Dimensional Cascades,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 31, No. 10, 1993, pp. 1785–1791. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11850 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Liu F. and Zheng X., “A Strongly Coupled Time-Marching Method for Solving the Navier–Stokes and k−ω Turbulence Model Equations with Multigrid,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 128, No. 2, 1996, pp. 289–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0211 JCTPAH 0021-9991 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Zheng X. and Liu F., “Staggered Upwind Method for Solving Navier–Stokes and k−ω Turbulence Model Equations,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 33, No. 6, 1995, pp. 991–998. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12808 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Menter F., “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, 1994, pp. 1598–1605. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Roe P., “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors and Difference Schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1981, pp. 357–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5 JCTPAH 0021-9991 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Denton J., “The Calculation of Three-Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 114, No. 1, 1992, pp. 18–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2927983 JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Saxer A. P. and Giles M. B., “Predictions of Three-Dimensional Steady and Unsteady Inviscid Transonic Stator/Rotor Interaction with Inlet Radial Temperature Nonuniformity,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1994, pp. 347–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2929421 JOTUEI 0889-504X CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Chima R. V., “Calculation of Multistage Turbomachinery Using Steady Characteristic Boundary Conditions,” NASA TM-1998-206613, 1998; also AIAA Paper 1998-0968, 1998. LinkGoogle Scholar[22] Wang D. and He L., “Adjoint Aerodynamic Design Optimization for Blades in Multi-Stage Turbomachines: Part I-Methodology and Verification,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 132, No. 2, 2010, Paper 021011. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3072498 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Walther B. and Nadarajah S., “Constrained Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Single-Stage Transonic Compressor,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 135, No. 2, 2013, Paper 021017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007502 CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byIntegrated passage design based on extended free-form deformation and adjoint optimizationChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 34Stochastic aerodynamic analysis for compressor blades with manufacturing variability based on a mathematical dimensionality reduction method29 December 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 236, No. 10Modeling of a turbine bladerow with stagger angle variation using the multi-fidelity influence superposition methodAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 121Robust design optimization considering inlet flow angle variations of a turbine cascadeAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 116Optimal Tolerance Allocation in Blade Manufacturing by Sensitivity-Based Performance Impact EvaluationJiaqi Luo, Yao Zheng and Feng Liu18 May 2020 | Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 36, No. 4Statistical evaluation of performance impact of manufacturing variability by an adjoint methodAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 77Design optimization of the last stage of a 4.5-stage compressor using a POD-based hybrid modelAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 76 What's Popular Volume 33, Number 4July 2017 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2016 by Jing Yang, Juntao Xiong, Ivan Mcbean, Said Havakechian, Feng Liu, and Jiaqi Luo. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0748-4658 (print) or 1533-3876 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamic PerformanceAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsCFD CodesComputational Fluid DynamicsEquations of Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFinite Volume MethodFluid DynamicsMonte Carlo MethodNumerical Analysis KeywordsMultistage TurbineTotal Mass Flow RateReynolds Averaged Navier StokesProbability Density FunctionsAerodynamic PerformanceMonte Carlo SimulationTurbomachineryMultistage CompressorsFlow EquationsFinite Difference MethodAcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to GE Power and The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51376009 and 51676003) for funding this work and allowing its publication. The authors also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, which have improved the quality of this Note.PDF Received24 September 2015Accepted31 October 2016Published online3 March 2017

Abstract:No AccessTechnical NotesOptimal Tolerance Allocation in Blade Manufacturing by Sensitivity-Based Performance Impact EvaluationJiaqi Luo, Yao Zheng and Feng LiuJiaqi LuoZhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China*Principal Investigator, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics; .Search for more papers by this author, Yao ZhengZhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China†Professor, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics; .Search for more papers by this author and Feng LiuUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-3975‡Professor, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering; . Fellow AIAA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:18 May 2020https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B37718SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Bammert K. and Sandstede H., “Influence of Manufacturing Tolerances and Surface Roughness of Blades on the Performance of Turbines,” Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 98, No. 1, 1976, pp. 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3446107 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Roelke R. and Haas J., “The Effect of Rotor Blade Thickness and Surface Finish on the Performance of a Small Axial Flow Turbine,” Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 105, No. 2, 1983, pp. 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3227426 Google Scholar[3] Garzon V. and Darmofal D., “Impact of Geometric Variability on Axial Compressor Performance,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 125, No. 4, 2003, pp. 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1622715 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Dong Z., Hu W. and Xue D., “New Production Cost-Tolerance Models for Tolerance Synthesis,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 116, No. 2, 1994, pp. 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2901931 Google Scholar[5] Edwards R., Asghar A., Woodason R., LaViolette M., Goni Boulama K. and Allan W., “Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Real World Blade Profile Variations on the Aerodynamic Performance of Transonic Nozzle Guide Vanes,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 134, No. 2, 2012, Paper 021014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003050 Google Scholar[6] Lange A., Voigt M., Vogeler K., Schrapp H., Johann E. and Gümmer V., “Impact of Manufacturing Variability on Multistage High-Pressure Compressor Performance,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 134, No. 11, 2012, Paper 112601. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007167 Google Scholar[7] Schnell R., Lengyel-Kampmann T. and Nicke E., “On the Impact of Geometric Variability on Fan Aerodynamic Performance, Unsteady Blade Row Interaction, and Its Mechanical Characteristics,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 136, No. 9, 2014, Paper 091005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027218 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Parussini L., Pediroda V. and Poloni C., “Prediction of Geometric Uncertainty Effects on Fluid Dynamics by Polynomial Chaos and Fictitious Domain Method,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2010, pp. 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2009.07.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Dow E. and Wang Q., “The Implications of Tolerance Optimization on Compressor Blade Design,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 137, No. 10, 2015, Paper 101008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030791 Google Scholar[10] Zamboni G., Banks G. and Bather S., “Gradient-Based Adjoint and Design of Experiment CFD Methodologies to Improve the Manufacturability of High Pressure Turbine Blades,” ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, ASME Paper GT2016-56042, Fairfield, NJ, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2016-56042 Google Scholar[11] Yang J., Xiong J., McBean I., Havakechian S., Liu F. and Luo J., “Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variations for Multistage Steam Turbines,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2017, pp. 1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36022 LinkGoogle Scholar[12] Jameson A., “Aerodynamic Design via Control Theory,” Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1988, pp. 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061285 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Luo J., Xiong J., McBean I. and Liu F., “Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Turbine Blade by Using an Adjoint Method,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 133, No. 1, 2011, Paper 011026. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001166 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Marta A. and Shankaran S., “Assessing Turbomachinery Performance Sensitivity to Boundary Conditions Using Control Theory,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 30, No. 5, 2014, pp. 1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35087 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Walther B. and Nadarajah S., “Adjoint-Based Constrained Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Multistage Turbomachines,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1298–1319. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35433 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Aissa M., Maffuli R., Mueller L. and Verstraete T., “Optimisation of a Turbine Inlet Guide Vane by Gradient-Based and Metamodel-Assisted Methods,” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 33, Nos. 6–7, 2019, pp. 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2019.1683168 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[17] Ghate D. and Giles M., “Efficient Hessian Calculation Using Automatic Differentiation,” 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2007-4059, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-4059 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Rumpfkeil M. and Mavriplis D., “Efficient Hessian Calculations Using Automatic Differentiation and the Adjoint Method with Applications,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 48, No. 10, 2010, pp. 2406–2417. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050451 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] Papadimitriou D. and Giannakoglou K., “Computation of the Hessian Matrix in Aerodynamic Inverse Design Using Continuous Adjoint Formulations,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 37, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.11.001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Papadimitriou D. and Giannakoglou K., “Direct, Adjoint and Mixed Approaches for the Computation of Hessian in Airfoil Design Problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 56, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1929–1943. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0363 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Hicken J. E., “Inexact Hessian-Vector Products in Reduced-Space Differential-Equation Constrained Optimization,” Optimization and Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2014, pp. 575–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-014-9258-6 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Shi-Dong D. and Nadarajah S., “Approximate Hessian for Accelerated Convergence of Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Problems in an Adjoint-Based Framework,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 168, May 2018, pp. 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.04.019 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Schillings C., Schimidt S. and Schulz V., “Efficient Shape Optimization for Certain and Uncertain Aerodynamic Design,” Computers and Fluids, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2011, pp. 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.12.007 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[24] Papadimitriou D. and Papadimitriou C., “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Minimum Robust Drag and Lift Reliability Constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 55, Aug. 2016, pp. 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.05.005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Luo J. and Liu F., “Performance Impact of Manufacturing Tolerances for a Turbine Blade Using Second Order Sensitivities,” ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, ASME Paper GT2018-75999, Fairfield, NJ, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75999 Google Scholar[26] Luo J. and Liu F., “Statistical Evaluation of Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variability by an Adjoint Method,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 77, June 2018, pp. 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.03.030 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[27] Pini M. and Cinnella P., “Hybrid Adjoint-Based Robust Optimization Approach for Fluid-Dynamics Problems,” 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA Paper 2013-1814, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-1814 Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byCompressor geometric uncertainty quantification under conditions from near choke to near stallChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 36, No. 3Uncertainty analysis of global and local performance impact of inflow and geometric uncertainties using sparse grid-based non-intrusive polynomial chaos15 April 2022 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, Vol. 236, No. 7A data-driven non-intrusive polynomial chaos for performance impact of high subsonic compressor cascades with stagger angle and profile errorsAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129Performance dispersion control of a multistage compressor based on precise identification of critical featuresAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 129A gradient-based method assisted by surrogate model for robust optimization of turbomachinery bladesChinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 35, No. 10Stochastic aerodynamic analysis for compressor blades with manufacturing variability based on a mathematical dimensionality reduction method29 December 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 236, No. 10Robust design optimization considering inlet flow angle variations of a turbine cascadeAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 116 What's Popular Volume 36, Number 4July 2020 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2020 by Jiaqi Luo, Yao Zheng, and Feng Liu. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3876 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamic PerformanceAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsComputational Fluid DynamicsEquations of Fluid DynamicsFinite Difference MethodFinite Element MethodFlow RegimesFluid DynamicsMonte Carlo MethodNumerical Analysis KeywordsShape FunctionsTurbomachinerySteam TurbinesAerodynamic Shape OptimizationAerodynamic PerformanceEuler EquationsExternal FlowsComputational Fluid DynamicsSingular Value DecompositionFinite Difference MethodAcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51676003 and 51976183) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (grant no. 2019QNA4058) for supporting the research work.PDF Received26 June 2019Accepted19 April 2020Published online18 May 2020

Statistics on geometric uncertainties of casting blades in low-pressure turbines

Statistical Investigations of Profile Error Impact on Flow and Performance of a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Of A Turbine Blade Considering Geometric Uncertainty Using An Adjoint Method

Statistical Evaluation of Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variability by an Adjoint Method

Performance Impact of Flow and Geometric Variations for a Turbine Blade Using an Adaptive NIPC Method

Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis for Manufacturing Variations of a Turbine Blade by an Adjoint Method

PERFORMANCE IMPACT OF MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES FOR A TURBINE BLADE USING SECOND ORDER SENSITIVITIES

Statistical Evaluation of Performance Impact of Flow Variations for a Transonic Compressor Rotor Blade

Quantification Of Performance Uncertainty For A Transonic Compressor Rotor Using An Adaptive Nipc Method

A Gradient-Based Method Assisted by Surrogate Model for Robust Optimization of Turbomachinery Blades

Performance Impact of Manufacturing Variations for Multistage Steam Turbines

Performance Impact of Uncertain Variations of Inlet Flow for Axial Compressor Blades

Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of blade geometric deviation on compressor performance

Optimal Tolerance Allocation in Blade Manufacturing by Sensitivity-Based Performance Impact Evaluation

Analysis of the Influence of Blade's Machining Error on Aerodynamic Performance of Impeller Based on NUMECA

Nonlinear uncertainty impact of geometric variations on aerodynamic performance of low-pressure turbine blades with ultra-high loading under extreme operational conditions

Uncertainty Quantification of the Effects of Small Manufacturing Deviations on Film Cooling: A Fan-Shaped Hole

Uncertainty quantification of geometric variations in transonic high-pressure turbine with different trailing edge and throat area distribution

A dimensionality reduction method for uncertainty study of geometric variations of turbomachinery blades

Uncertainty quantification in effects of geometric deviations on heat transfer and film cooling of blade squealer tip with pressure-side coolant

Influence of manufacturing errors on the aerodynamic working stability of axial flow compressors