Abstract:The article discusses the transformations of technology in the last two decades, especially those related to privacy, based on the digital rights perspective. It debates how the concept of privacy is grounded on the distinction between public and private, a spatial metaphor no longer applicable in the face of the ubiquity of information and communication technologies. Hence, there is a premise stating the personal is increasingly more political nowadays, due to the phenomenon of surveillance capitalism. To anchor the theoretical debate in an empirically informed discussion, the work analyzes discourses about digital rights used in the main sessions of the Internet Governance Forum. The goal is to map the main Forum controversies about digital rights and their relation with contemporary democracies. Using a combined methodology based on both quantitative and qualitative data from the main sessions of the event, the analysis starts from a survey of the recurrence keywords related to the research; privacy, rights, surveillance, and freedom. From these results, a qualitative analysis of the discourses mobilized in these activities is conducted. The outcomes of the empirical analysis are then discussed from examples of technology regulation in the United States and the European Union. Among the main conclusions of the work, the emphasis lies on the need for transparency and accountability of the artificial intelligence algorithms. Related Articles Glen, Carol M. 2021. "Norm Entrepreneurship in Global Cybersecurity." Politics & Policy 49(5): 1121–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12430. Robles, Pedro, and Daniel J. Mallinson. 2023. "Catching Up with AI: Pushing Toward a Cohesive Governance Framework." Politics & Policy 51(3): 355–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12529. Zeng, Jinghan, Tim Stevens, and Yaru Chen. 2017. "China's Solution to Global Cyber Governance: Unpacking the Domestic Discourse of 'Internet Sovereignty.'" Politics & Policy 45(3): 432–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12202. Los derechos digitales en perspectiva: La evolución del debate en el Foro de Gobernanza de Internet El artículo analiza las transformaciones de la tecnología en las últimas décadas, especialmente aquellas relacionadas con la privacidad, desde la perspectiva de los derechos digitales. Se debate cómo el concepto de privacidad se basa en la distinción entre lo público y lo privado, una metáfora espacial que ya no es aplicable ante la ubicuidad de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. De ahí que se parta de la premisa de que lo personal es cada vez más político hoy en día, debido al fenómeno del capitalismo de vigilancia. Para anclar el debate teórico en una discusión empíricamente informada, el trabajo analiza los discursos sobre los derechos digitales utilizados en las principales sesiones del Foro para la Gobernanza de Internet. El objetivo es mapear las principales controversias sobre los derechos digitales y su relación con las democracias contemporáneas. El procedimiento adoptado es una metodología combinada basada en datos tanto cuantitativos como cualitativos de las principales sesiones del evento. El análisis parte de un relevamiento de las palabras clave recurrentes relacionadas con la investigación; privacidad, derechos, vigilancia y libertad. A partir de estos resultados se realiza un análisis cualitativo de los discursos movilizados en estas actividades. En la segunda parte, se discuten los resultados del análisis empírico a partir de ejemplos de regulación tecnológica en los Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea. Entre las principales conclusiones del trabajo, el énfasis recae en la necesidad de transparencia y rendición de cuentas de los algoritmos de inteligencia artificial. 正确看待数字权利:互联网治理论坛辩论的演变本文从数字权利的角度探讨了过去几十年的技术转型,特别是与隐私相关的技术转型。本文讨论了隐私概念如何基于公共和私人之间的区别,这一区别是一个空间隐喻,然而,该隐喻在普遍的信息通信技术情境下不再适用。因此,出现了一个假设,即由于监视资本主义现象,个人正变得越来越政治化。为了将理论辩论置于一项基于实证的讨论,本文分析了互联网治理论坛主要会议中使用的有关数字权利的话语。目的是描述一系列有关数字权利及其与当代民主国家关系的主要争议。采用的综合方法基于互联网治理论坛主要会议的定量数据和定性数据。分析从"与研究相关的重复关键词调查"开始,这些关键词包括:隐私、权利、监视、自由。根据分析结果,对这些活动中动员的话语进行了定性分析。随后,本文描绘了近二十年来数字权利辩论及其争议的演变。本文的第二部分以美国和欧盟的技术监管为例,讨论了实证分析的结果。本文的主要结论聚焦于人工智能算法透明度及问责的必要性。

The Paradox of the Right to Memory and the Right to Be Forgotten in the Digital Era and Coping Strategies

Reconsidering the ‘Right to be Forgotten’ – memory rights and the right to memory in the new media era

Right to be Forgotten in the Era of Large Language Models: Implications, Challenges, and Solutions

Cyberkans and Ineffectvie Communication:A New Public Forum Doctrine in the Internet Era

Collective memory or the right to be forgotten? Cultures of digital memory and forgetting in the European Union

The right to be forgotten: A new human right?

The Right to Be Forgotten in the Digital Age: The Challenges of Data Protection Beyond Borders

Right to be Forgotten as a Special Digital Right

Digital rights in perspective: The evolution of the debate in the Internet Governance Forum

Identifying the fourth generation of human rights in digital era

Research on the conflict between digital right management and fair use and its countermeasures

‘A Right to Be Forgotten’: Retrospective Privacy Concerns in Social Networking Services

Protection or Cynicism? Dual Strategies for Coping with Privacy Threats

The Nature of the Right to Be Forgotten and its Role in the Human Rights System

Formalizing Data Deletion in the Context of the Right to be Forgotten

On the Significance of Procedural Justice in the Digital Age——Focusing on Algocracy and Due Process of Risk Management Chinese Full Text

Eternal Sunshine of the Mechanical Mind: The Irreconcilability of Machine Learning and the Right to be Forgotten

Paradoxes in Digital Government: A Systematic Literature Review

Analysis of Personal Privacy Risks and Protection Countermeasures under the Privacy Paradox Dimension

On the Limits of the Provision of Anti- circumvention to Fair Use of Copyright

Internet Spirit and Digital Rights Management