Abstract:Each society is marked by a selective cultural memory which, beside events and traditions whose importance is emphasized, is also constituted by its parts and contents whose influence is either diminished or forgotten. Our society, too is marked by such kind of memory, with obvious reduction, value opposition and, in sum, general duality within the reception of cultural memory, which is always more complex than it appears in political speeches mother-tongue reading books or history textbooks. For this reason, an examination of construction and reception of cultural memory, with an emphasis on traditions of Enlightenment and Romanticism, stems from a necessity to answer a set of questions regarding the contemporary relation to the past, the way "distance" or "proximity" to the latter is constituted, and especially the way in which contemporary practices mark, change and make use of cultural history. Starting from the assumptions that shaping cultural history, its heritage and "memory" is closely connected to the beginnings of nation-building and that cultural memory is a never-ending political process it is my intention in this research project to examine the rivalry juxtapositions, "interruptions" and new foundations of traditions, focusing on the interdependent relation of Enlightenment and Romanticist strands, and particularly on their unmarked, empty spots. Just as cultural memory is a result of two opposed processes - foregrounding and oblivion - so this research is similarly devoted to a double and apparently paradoxical task. On one hand, the accent is on the resurrection and reinforcement of integrative segments of these traditions which, at the time of their emergence as well as in subsequent interpretations, were mostly neglected. On the other hand there is the need to keep pace with what is required by the current "acceleration of time", which amounts to nothing else but the necessity to forget. Briefly put, the aim is to point to disciplinary-interdependent, more nuances and more communicative ways of viewing these relations, which would diminish the exclusivist and profound opposition within the contemporary reception of the traditions examined.

Collective memory or the right to be forgotten? Cultures of digital memory and forgetting in the European Union

Reconsidering the ‘Right to be Forgotten’ – memory rights and the right to memory in the new media era

Memory in the digital age

The digital turn in memory studies

Right to be Forgotten as a Special Digital Right

Digital archives in the cloud: Collective memory, institutional histories and the politics of information

The Right to Be Forgotten in the Digital Age: The Challenges of Data Protection Beyond Borders

Sculpting digital voids: The politics of forgetting on Facebook

Preserving the Past, Enabling the Future: Assessing the European Policy on Access to Archives in the Digital Age

A Cultural Memory of the Digital Age?

The Europeanization of Holocaust Memory and Eastern Europe

Between Lived and Archived Memory: How Digital Archives Can Tell History

The right to be forgotten: A new human right?

Collective Memory in the Digital Age

From Bricks to Clicks: How Digital Heritage Initiatives Create a New Ecosystem for Cultural Heritage and Collective Remembering

Memory as a battlefield: European memorial laws and freedom of speech

European-enlightenment and national-romanticist sources of cultural memory: Reflections in contemporary debates

Collective memory: theory and politics

Entrepreneurs of memory: Selling history in the GDR Museum shop in Berlin

Memory as National Values

Remembering like a state: Surveillance databases, digital activist traces and the repressive potential of mediated prospective memory