Design, Development, and Evaluation of the Blood Collection Management Workstation
Huanhuan Huang,Huimei Yin,Wenxin Xu,Qi Wang,Mingzhao Xiao,Qinghua Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S384866
2022-10-31
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Huanhuan Huang, 1 Huimei Yin, 2 Wenxin Xu, 1 Qi Wang, 3 Mingzhao Xiao, 4 Qinghua Zhao 1 1 Department of Nursing, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China; 3 Department of Medical Informatics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China; 4 Department of Urology, Urologist, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Qinghua Zhao, Department of Nursing, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1st Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 023 89012206, Email Purpose: To design and develop a blood collection management workstation with high usability to reduce the risk of preanalytical errors and improve patient safety. Methods: A five-phase mobile application development lifecycle model (MADLC) and experience-based co-design (EBCD) were used for design and development. Subsequently, the blood collection management workstation was evaluated using the Chinese System Usability Scale (SUS) in a general ward setting from January to June 2021. Results: It was used on 2593 in-patients who underwent phlebotomy with 12,378 tubes being labeled. The rate of errors and meantime for blood sampling were decreased compared with the same period in the previous year. A total of 14 nurses agreed to participate in the evaluation, and the overall raw SUS score was 69.26 ± 10.39, which indicated above average results. Conclusion: The blood collection management workstation has shown the potential to decrease errors and improve working efficiency in a clinical setting. The study also identified some weaknesses, which will be amended in the future. Keywords: patient safety, identification, pre-analytical phase, phlebotomy, technology Biological specimens play an irreplaceable role in the diagnosis, assessment, and monitoring of disease in precision medicine. 1 Specimens' quality and accreditation are of great significance to ensure reliable results and also promote patient safety. Despite evidence of highly accurate test results, many hurdles remain to be overcome. 2 Experts and scholars gradually reached a consensus that unqualified or inappropriate specimens were mainly generated from the pre-analytical phase (PRE), 3,4 which encompassed all procedures from the clinician's request to the laboratory. 5 It was reported that PRE accounted for 46% to 84.5% of total errors, and a high error rate (18.5–47%) was found in the PRE. 6 Venous blood sampling (phlebotomy) is the most common invasive procedure performed in patient care and the most common source of preanalytical variability. 4 Therefore, it is essential to raise awareness and take immediate improvements to manage it in the PRE. 7 Although commonly considered as a simple clinical practice, the standard procedure of a phlebotomy is complex and contains up to 15 steps in the PRE, 8 from the initial preparing to sending the properly labeled blood collection tubes to the appropriate laboratories. 9 A study conducted in 12 European countries by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (EFLM WG-PRE) found that the highest risk steps during a phlebotomy in the PRE were patient identification and subsequent tube labeling. 10,11 Medical errors have been considered as the third leading cause of death in the United States, and identification errors are prominent. 12 Improper identification leads to delayed diagnoses and treatments, additional tests and costs, or even severe transfusion reactions that threaten life. Since 2002, the Joint Commission named improving the accuracy of patient identification as the first of its National Patient Safety Goals. 13 There is room for improvement, and harmonization of the preanalytical step is necessary. Recently, emerging innovative technologies, such as barcodes, radio frequency identification (RFID) chips, and even fingerprints, 14 have shown a promising scenario for nurses, which could improve patient safety and nursing efficiency. 15,16 Besides, at the hospital level, it was demonstrated that information construction levels had a large impact on the performance of caring quality. 17 Automation and standard protocols in the PRE are fundamental to support or extend clinical nursing. 1 -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services