Abstract:Background: Controversy surrounding Family Presence during Resuscitation (FPDR) continues internationally. The attitudes of medical professionals toward FPDR are particularly important for its clinical implementation. Currently, there is a lack of validated tools to evaluate medical professionals' perceptions of FPDR in China. The study aimed to: (1) Cross-culturally adapt and validate the Family Presence Risk-Benefit Scale (FPR-BS) and the Self-Confidence Scale (FPS-CS) for use in China; and (2) investigate the nurses' perceptions of FPDR and explore the relationships between the nurses' perceptual variables and demographic variables. Methods: The English version of the FPR-BS and FPS-CS underwent a rigorous process of translation, back-translation, proofreading, and cultural adaptation to create the Chinese versions. In the first stage, a sample of 200 nurses were recruited to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scales. In the second stage, a larger cohort 519 nurses were invited to assess their perceptions of FPDR and the relationships between these perceptual variables and demographic variables. Results: Exploratory factorial analysis identified a single dimension for both the FPR-BS and FPS-CS, explaining 43.84% and 48.43% of the variance, respectively. The Scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) of the FPR-BS and the FPS-CS was 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. Reliability assessments yielded Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.933 for the FPR-BS and 0.930 for the FPS-CS. The split-half reliability coefficients were 0.832 for the FPR-BS and 0.835 for the FPS-CS, while the retest reliability coefficients were 0.742 and 0.927, respectively. The average scores obtained were 2.76 (SD = 0.52) for the FPR-BS and 3.43 (SD = 0.58) for the FPS-CS. Statistical analyses revealed that factors such as patient type, family members' prior experience with resuscitation, and the number of times nurses invited family members during resuscitation significantly influenced perceptions of the benefits and risks associated with FPDR (P < 0.05). Furthermore, obtaining certification as an intensive care specialist was positively associated with nurses' self-confidence in managing FPDR (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The FPR-BS and FPS-CS were validated as effective instruments for measuring nurses' perceptions of PFDR, demonstrating acceptable levels of validity and reliability. While nurses reported fewer benefits and greater risks of FPDR, they exhibited increased self-confidence in managing family presence during resuscitation.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Bereavement Risk Assessment Tool

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Preoperative Assessment of Readiness Tool among Surgical Patients

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (C-PBCCS) in nursing practice

Validity and reliability of the Chinese-Version of the Br?set Violence Checklist

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

Chinese Translation of the Coma Recovery Scale—Revised

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the family presence risk-benefit and self-confidence scales in Chinese nurses

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Benefit Finding Questionnaire for people with mental disorders

Development of the Chinese version of Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool in Cancer for Caregivers

Chinese version of the Death Anxiety Beliefs and Behaviours Scale: Psychometric properties based on CTT and IRT

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for parents of children with cancer

Validity and Reliability of the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale—Chinese Version

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Revised Version of Distress Tolerance Scale

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the BCPT Eight Symptom Scale (BESS) in Breast Cancer Patients

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Chinese/Mandarin Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-C/M)

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Trauma Resiliency Scale (tRS-18)

A Chinese Version of a Likert-type Death Anxiety Scale for Colorectal Cancer Patients

Validity of the Brief Resilience Scale and Brief Resilient Coping Scale in a Chinese Sample

Validation of a Chinese version of the Analysing and Developing Adaptability and Performance in Teams to Enhance Resilience Scale in nurses in China

Reliability and Validity of the Translated Chinese Version of Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (Compact-C) in Breast Cancer Survivors