Abstract:Fish, acting as the dominant vertebrates in aquatic ecosystems, exhibit strong mobility and complex activity patterns, which make it challenging for the quantitative assessment of fish communities. Previous fieldwork has applied multiple fish sampling devices as well as eDNA technology respectively, with limited studies comparing the reliability, representativity, and applicability of eDNA metabarcoding and traditional sampling methods in investigating fish assemblages across spatiotemporal scales. In this study, we selected Lake Huang (a provincial nature reserve) to compare the eDNA technology and traditional sampling methods (multi-mesh gillnets and accordion-shaped traps) in revealing differences in species composition, α diversity, and β diversity of fish assemblages in both high-water phase and low-water phase. Results showed that eDNA technology detected more fish species and required fewer samples to achieve sufficient sampling compared to traditional methods. Specifically, our results demonstrated significant methodological variations in species composition, with both traditional sampling and eDNA approaches revealing the method-dependent species checklist. In the high-water phase, the eDNA approach recorded significantly lower β diversity (βSOR and βSIM) than traditional sampling methods, which may result from the more homogeneous eDNA water samples triggered by flooding, resulting in lower between-sites variations in fish communities. However, in the low-water phase, eDNA technology reported significantly higher β diversity (βSOR and βSNE) than traditional sampling methods, potentially attributed to the loss of eDNA information as well as heterogeneous eDNA samples accompanied by water receding. In addition, taking advantage of the separated and narrowed habitat in the low-water phase, fish individuals were more easily captured, resulting in a relatively higher Shannon-Wiener index recorded by traditional sampling methods. Based on inconsistency in species composition characterized by two methods, our results exhibited that eDNA technology is more efficient in detecting species, while there was an urgent need to design more sensitive primers, provide more complete reference databases, and popularize more emerging sequencing platforms for the advancement of eDNA technology. Comparing with the fish assemblage diversity identified by traditional sampling methods, our result exhibited the transport of DNA fragments may potentially enlarge the homogenized or heterogeneous fish community characterization influenced by flood pulses.

Unsupervised biological integrity assessment by eDNA biomonitoring of multi-trophic aquatic taxa

eDNA metabarcoding revealed differential structures of aquatic communities in a dynamic freshwater ecosystem shaped by habitat heterogeneity

Supervised machine learning improves general applicability of eDNA metabarcoding for reservoir health monitoring

eDNA metabarcoding reveals differences in fish diversity and community structure in heterogeneous habitat areas shaped by cascade hydropower

Fish Community Monitoring in Floodplain Lakes: Edna Metabarcoding and Traditional Sampling Revealed Inconsistent Fish Community Composition

Effectiveness assessment of using water environmental microHI to predict the health status of wild fish

Integrated machine learning reveals aquatic biological integrity patterns in semi-arid watersheds

Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Health Using Multiple Indicator Species

Bridging the gap: The integration of eDNA techniques and traditional sampling in fish diversity analysis

Unraveling Fish Diversity and Assembly Patterns in a Temperate River: Evidence from Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Morphological Data

Aquatic invertebrate diversity profiling in heterogeneous wetland habitats by environmental DNA metabarcoding

Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals the biological community structure in Poyang Lake, China

Assessment of Benthic Invertebrate Diversity and River Ecological Status along an Urbanized Gradient Using Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and a Traditional Survey Method.

Embracing eDNA and machine learning for taxonomy-free microorganisms biomonitoring to assess the river ecological status

Holistic Impact Evaluation of Human Activities on the Coastal Fish Biodiversity in the Chinese Coastal Environment

Simultaneously Monitoring Aquatic and Riparian Biodiversity Using Riverine Water Edna

Estimating aquatic plant diversity and distribution in rivers from Jingjinji region, China, using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method

Consideration of Multitrophic Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functions Improves Indices on River Ecological Status

Evaluating eDNA and eRNA metabarcoding for aquatic biodiversity assessment: From bacteria to vertebrates

Assessment of Fish Communities Using Environmental DNA: Effect of Spatial Sampling Design in Lentic Systems of Different Sizes

Application of environmental DNA metabarcoding to identify fish community characteristics in subtropical river systems