Abstract:We conducted a systematic review of 300 peer‐reviewed eDNA and eRNA studies in aquatic ecology and found a geographical bias, with the majority of studies concentrated in high‐income countries and limited representation from South America and Africa. We also observed a lack of methodological standardization, including variations in filtration volume, filter material, eDNA and eRNA extraction method, marker choice, and bioinformatic pipelines, emphasizing the need for guidelines to promote methodological transparency and reproducibility in eDNA and eRNA monitoring across aquatic systems. Molecular technologies have facilitated the expansion of biodiversity assessments across a broad range of organisms and aquatic systems. Environmental DNA (eDNA) and environmental RNA (eRNA), collectively referred to as environmental nucleic acids (eNAs), have revolutionized biodiversity monitoring due to their noninvasive nature and high‐resolution capabilities when compared to traditional survey methods. While eNA applications have grown exponentially over the past decade, methodological inconsistencies hinder reproducibility and comparability. To assess the current state of eNA methodologies in aquatic ecology, we conducted a systematic review of 300 peer‐reviewed eNA studies that assess ecological communities across diverse aquatic systems. Of these papers, 291 examine eDNA, four examine eRNA, and five consider both eDNA and eRNA. The small number of eRNA studies compared to eDNA highlights the eRNA field is in its infancy. Of the eNA studies looked at, we found a clear geographic bias, with approximately 50% of all eNA studies occurring in six high‐income countries, while less than 10% of eNA studies occur across South America and Africa. Further, we report a lack of methodological standardization across eNA studies, showing high variability in water filtration volume, filter material, filter pore size, eNA extraction method, marker choice, and bioinformatic pipelines. We further highlight that incomplete reference sequence databases for both eRNA and eDNA limit taxonomic assignment and biodiversity inferences. Finally, we identify a systematic issue across eNA studies in community ecology: missing methodological details, which compromise reproducibility, especially in newly emerging eRNA applications. To facilitate the standardization of eNA monitoring across aquatic systems and permit the further integration of eNA applications in biodiversity monitoring, we recommend the improvement of reference databases alongside guidelines that encourage methodological transparency.

Massive Necrosis of a Complete Hydatidiform Mole in a Twin Pregnancy With a Surviving Coexistent Fetus

Environmental nucleic acids: a field‐based comparison for monitoring freshwater habitats using eDNA and eRNA

Application of environmental DNA metabarcoding to identify fish community characteristics in subtropical river systems

eDNA metabarcoding revealed differential structures of aquatic communities in a dynamic freshwater ecosystem shaped by habitat heterogeneity

Bridging the gap: The integration of eDNA techniques and traditional sampling in fish diversity analysis

Embracing eDNA and machine learning for taxonomy-free microorganisms biomonitoring to assess the river ecological status

Application of eDNA metabarcoding for monitoring the fish diversity of the Jiangjin to Fuling section of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River

Evaluating the effectiveness of the eRNA technique in monitoring fish biodiversity--A case study in the Qingdao offshore, China

Urban landscape-level biodiversity assessments of aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates environmental DNA

Advances in environmental DNA monitoring: standardization, automation, and emerging technologies in aquatic ecosystems

Urban landscape-level biodiversity assessments of aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates by environmental DNA metabarcoding.

Application of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Predicting Anthropogenic Pollution in Rivers.

Metabarcoding by Combining Environmental DNA with Environmental RNA to Monitor Fish Species in the Han River, Korea

Effectiveness of eDNA for monitoring riverine macroinvertebrates

Edna Metabarcoding in Zooplankton Improves the Ecological Status Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystems

A comparative analysis of eDNA metabarcoding and field surveys: Exploring freshwater plant communities in rivers

Environmental DNA and RNA in aquatic community ecology: Toward methodological standardization

New insights into biologic interpretation of bioinformatic pipelines for fish eDNA metabarcoding: A case study in Pearl River estuary

eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages

Unsupervised biological integrity assessment by eDNA biomonitoring of multi-trophic aquatic taxa

Fishing Edna in One of the World's Largest Rivers: A Case Study of Cross-Sectional and Depth Profile Sampling in the Yangtze.