Abstract:We introduce the resource allocation problem where a planner needs to purchase different resources from providers of different qualities and costs, and the planner allocates the resources/providers to consumers with different preferences. The planner has a budget that limits how much he can spend on the resources. He wants to maximize the social welfare generated from the consumers, while keeping his total expenditure for purchasing the resources within his budget. Previous studies have either focused on the resource acquisition part, with one buyer and many strategic sellers, or the resource allocation part, with one seller and many strategic buyers. This is for the first time both providers and consumers are included in the picture. The consumers do not pay for the resources and will act to maximize their individual utilities. Thus the planner must use proper rationing tools to make sure that they will stick to the providers allocated to them. Two widely existing rationing tools are studied in this paper: waiting times and lotteries (and the combination of them). We characterize (sometimes partially) the structures of optimal allocation schemes when different rationing tools are used, and we identify conditions under which lotteries can do better and under which waiting times can do better. We also settle the computation complexity for computing/approximating them. For resource allocation with waiting times, we show that the optimal solution is NP-hard to find, and we construct an FPTAS for it. For resource allocation with lotteries, we show that for a large class of the problem the optimal solution has a surprisingly simple structure, and can be solved by a linear program. Following our results, neither waiting time nor lottery is absolutely better than the other in terms of generating social welfare. A planner should choose an appropriate tool based on the conditions that we identify. Our results then let the planner computes/approximates the corresponding optimal allocations efficiently. Indeed, our results are the first systematic study of both rationing tools when resource acquisition and resource allocation occur together (which is often the case in real life), and we provide useful approaches for future study on this more general and realistic model.

Population Monotonic Allocation Schemes for the Two-Period Economic Lot-Sizing Games

On the Price of Anarchy of Two-Stage Machine Scheduling Games

The Existence and Efficiency of PMMS Allocations

Multi-period Lot-Sizing with Supplier Selection: Structural Results, Complexity and Algorithms.

Multi-objective Long-Term Generation Scheduling Based on Two Person-Zero Sum Games

Simultaneously Satisfying MXS and EFL

A genetic algorithm to solve the production lot-sizing problem with capacity adjustment

An HNP-MP Approach for the Capacitated Multi-Item Lot Sizing Problem with Setup Times

Online Scheduling On Two Uniform Machines To Minimize The Makespan With A Periodic Availability Constraint

Unitary Owen points in cooperative lot-sizing models with backlogging

Joint Optimization of Lot-Sizing and Pricing with Backlogging

A Study on Capacity Allocation Scheme with Seasonal Demand

Resource Allocation with Budgets : Optimal Stable Allocations and Optimal Lotteries ∗

A Time-Varying Lot Size Method for the Economic Lot Scheduling Problem with Shelf Life Considerations

Axiomatization Allocation of Emission Allowances in Power Systems Considering Bounded Rationality Strategic Voting

Mathematical Models For Capacitated Multi-Level Production Planning Problems With Linked Lot Sizes

A Multi-Phase Algorithm For A Joint Lot-Sizing And Pricing Problem With Stochastic Demands

An Optimization Framework for Solving Capacitated Multi-Level Lot-Sizing Problems with Backlogging.

Joint Optimal Constant Pricing and Lot Sizing Models with Backlogging

Lot Sizing Models with Backlog or Out-Sourcing.

Two-stage Stochastic Lot-sizing Problem with Chance-constrained Condition in the Second Stage