Abstract:Enterprise efficciency is limited by data exchange. A product designer might specify the geometry of a product with a Computer Aided Design program, an engineer might re-use that geometry data to calculate physical properties of the product using a Finite Element Analysis program. Theese diffeerent domains place diffeerent requirements on the product representation. Representations of product data required for diffeerent tasks is dependent on the vendor softwware associated with those tasks, sharing data between diffeerent vendor programs is limited by incompatibility of the vendor formats used. In the case of Computer Aided Design where the virtual form of an object is modelled, no standard data format captures complete model data. Common data standards transfer model surface geometry without capturing the topological elements from which these geometries are constructed. Theere are prescriptive data representations to allow these features to be specifieed in a neutral format, but littlle incentive for vendors to adopt these schemes. Recent effeorts instead focus on identifying similar feature elements between diffeerent vendor CAD programs, however this approach relies on onerous manual identifiecation requiring frequent revision. Theis research develops methods to automate the task of mapping relationships between diffeerent data format representations. Two independent matching techniques identify similar CAD feature functions between heterogeneous programs. Text similarity and object geometry matching techniques are combined to match the data formats associated with CAD programs. An efficcient search for matching function parameters is performed using a genetic algorithm that incorporates semantic data matching and geometry data matching. A greedy semantic matching algorithm is developed that compares with the Doc2vec short text matching technique over the API dataset tested. A SVD geometric surface registration technique is developed that requires fewer calculations than an equivalent Iterative Closest Point method.

Automated Analysis of Differences in the Functionality and Performance of 3D CAD Systems for Collaborative Design

Visualized Performance Evaluation of 3D CAD Software Based on the Characterization of Test Data by Cloud Model

Heterogeneous Collaborative Design of Isomeric CAD Based on Feature Data Exchange

A Preliminary Study on Synchronized Collaborative Design Based on Heterogeneous CAD Systems

Virtual Assembly and Tolerance Analysis for Collaborative Design.

A study for differences between different design drawing programs in sheet metal design

A comparative analysis of computer-aided design team performance with collaboration software

Research on Big Data Technology in Civil Engineering Building Computer Assisted Design

A comparative analysis of CAD modeling approaches for design solution space exploration

A generic approach for analysis of mechanical assembly

Difference identification of 3D CAD models based on key-point matching oriented to engineering change management

Early problems identification in collaborative engineering with different product data modelling standards

An automated method mapping parametric features between computer aided design software

Data Interface between CAD Software and CAE Software

A Survey of Heterogeneous CAD System Integration

In the Age of Collaboration, the Computer-Aided Design Ecosystem is Behind: An Interview Study of Distributed CAD Practice

An Automated Approach for the Discovery of Interoperability

A Web-based Collaborative CAD System for Multiple User Design

Automatic 3D CAD Model and 2D Drawings Generation in Construction Engineering

Analysis of Collaborative Assembly in Multi-User Computer-Aided Design

Application of 3D CAD in the Design of Inspection and Planning System of Intelligent Three-coordinate Measuring Machine