Abstract:Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a large class of relational models for graph processing. Recent theoretical studies on the expressive power of GNNs have focused on two issues. On the one hand, it has been proven that GNNs are as powerful as the Weisfeiler–Lehman test (1-WL) in their ability to distinguish graphs. Moreover, it has been shown that the equivalence enforced by 1-WL equals unfolding equivalence. On the other hand, GNNs turned out to be universal approximators on graphs modulo the constraints enforced by 1-WL/unfolding equivalence. However, these results only apply to Static Attributed Undirected Homogeneous Graphs (SAUHG) with node attributes. In contrast, real-life applications often involve a much larger variety of graph types. In this paper, we conduct a theoretical analysis of the expressive power of GNNs for two other graph domains that are particularly interesting in practical applications, namely dynamic graphs and SAUGHs with edge attributes. Dynamic graphs are widely used in modern applications; hence, the study of the expressive capability of GNNs in this domain is essential for practical reasons and, in addition, it requires a new analyzing approach due to the difference in the architecture of dynamic GNNs compared to static ones. On the other hand, the examination of SAUHGs is of particular relevance since they act as a standard form for all graph types: it has been shown that all graph types can be transformed without loss of information to SAUHGs with both attributes on nodes and edges. This paper considers generic GNN models and appropriate 1-WL tests for those domains. Then, the known results on the expressive power of GNNs are extended to the mentioned domains: it is proven that GNNs have the same capability as the 1-WL test, the 1-WL equivalence equals unfolding equivalence and that GNNs are universal approximators modulo 1-WL/unfolding equivalence. Moreover, the proof of the approximation capability is mostly constructive and allows us to deduce hints on the architecture of GNNs that can achieve the desired approximation.

GOING BEYOND 1-WL EXPRESSIVE POWER WITH 1-LAYER GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS

Rethinking the Expressive Power of GNNs via Graph Biconnectivity

Provably Powerful Graph Networks

How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?

Improving the Expressive Power of Graph Neural Network with Tinhofer Algorithm

On the Expressive Power of Graph Neural Networks

A Complete Expressiveness Hierarchy for Subgraph GNNs Via Subgraph Weisfeiler-Lehman Tests.

Twin Weisfeiler-Lehman: High Expressive GNNs for Graph Classification

Weisfeiler–Lehman goes dynamic: An analysis of the expressive power of Graph Neural Networks for attributed and dynamic graphs

Fine-grained Expressivity of Graph Neural Networks

Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Counting

A Complete Expressiveness Hierarchy for Subgraph GNNs via Subgraph Weisfeiler-Lehman Tests

On Structural Expressive Power of Graph Transformers

Representation Power of Graph Neural Networks: Improved Expressivity via Algebraic Analysis

On the Expressive Power of Geometric Graph Neural Networks

1-WL Expressiveness Is (Almost) All You Need

Breaking the Expressive Bottlenecks of Graph Neural Networks

An Empirical Study of Realized GNN Expressiveness

Breaking the Expression Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks

Empowering GNNs via Edge-Aware Weisfeiler-Leman Algorithm