Abstract:Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a large class of relational models for graph processing. Recent theoretical studies on the expressive power of GNNs have focused on two issues. On the one hand, it has been proven that GNNs are as powerful as the Weisfeiler–Lehman test (1-WL) in their ability to distinguish graphs. Moreover, it has been shown that the equivalence enforced by 1-WL equals unfolding equivalence. On the other hand, GNNs turned out to be universal approximators on graphs modulo the constraints enforced by 1-WL/unfolding equivalence. However, these results only apply to Static Attributed Undirected Homogeneous Graphs (SAUHG) with node attributes. In contrast, real-life applications often involve a much larger variety of graph types. In this paper, we conduct a theoretical analysis of the expressive power of GNNs for two other graph domains that are particularly interesting in practical applications, namely dynamic graphs and SAUGHs with edge attributes. Dynamic graphs are widely used in modern applications; hence, the study of the expressive capability of GNNs in this domain is essential for practical reasons and, in addition, it requires a new analyzing approach due to the difference in the architecture of dynamic GNNs compared to static ones. On the other hand, the examination of SAUHGs is of particular relevance since they act as a standard form for all graph types: it has been shown that all graph types can be transformed without loss of information to SAUHGs with both attributes on nodes and edges. This paper considers generic GNN models and appropriate 1-WL tests for those domains. Then, the known results on the expressive power of GNNs are extended to the mentioned domains: it is proven that GNNs have the same capability as the 1-WL test, the 1-WL equivalence equals unfolding equivalence and that GNNs are universal approximators modulo 1-WL/unfolding equivalence. Moreover, the proof of the approximation capability is mostly constructive and allows us to deduce hints on the architecture of GNNs that can achieve the desired approximation.

Twin Weisfeiler-Lehman: High Expressive GNNs for Graph Classification

Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-Order Graph Neural Networks

Provably Powerful Graph Networks

Identity-aware Graph Neural Networks

Two-Dimensional Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction

A Complete Expressiveness Hierarchy for Subgraph GNNs via Subgraph Weisfeiler-Lehman Tests

Nested Graph Neural Networks

A Complete Expressiveness Hierarchy for Subgraph GNNs Via Subgraph Weisfeiler-Lehman Tests.

From Relational Pooling to Subgraph GNNs: A Universal Framework for More Expressive Graph Neural Networks

Beyond Weisfeiler-Lehman: A Quantitative Framework for GNN Expressiveness

Improving Graph Neural Network Expressivity via Subgraph Isomorphism Counting

TGNN: A Joint Semi-supervised Framework for Graph-level Classification

Fine-grained Expressivity of Graph Neural Networks

Weisfeiler–Lehman goes dynamic: An analysis of the expressive power of Graph Neural Networks for attributed and dynamic graphs

On the Expressive Power of Geometric Graph Neural Networks

Generalized Equivariance and Preferential Labeling for GNN Node Classification

A Practical, Progressively-Expressive GNN

From Stars to Subgraphs: Uplifting Any GNN with Local Structure Awareness

Empowering GNNs via Edge-Aware Weisfeiler-Leman Algorithm

Beyond 1-WL with Local Ego-Network Encodings

Weisfeiler Leman for Euclidean Equivariant Machine Learning