Abstract:Deep neural networks have achieved significant success in the artificial intelligence community and various downstream tasks. They encode images or texts into dense feature representations and are supervised by a large amount of labeled data. Due to the expensiveness of high-quality labeled data, a huge number of easy-to-access instances are collected to conduct supervised learning. However, they have not been annotated by experts and thus can contain numerous noisy instances, which will degrade the performance. To learn robust feature representations despite misleading noisy labels, we employ supervised contrastive learning to directly perform supervision in the hidden space, rather than in the prediction space like the prevalent cross-entropy loss function. However, cutting-edge noisy label learning methods with supervised contrastive learning always discard the data considered to be noisy, and thus cannot tolerate high-ratio noisy datasets. Therefore, we propose a novel training strategy named Supervised Contrastive Learning with Corrected Labels (S cl ^2 ) to defend against the attack of noisy labels. S cl ^2 corrects the noisy labels with an empirical small-loss assumption and conducts supervised contrastive learning using these corrected data. Specifically, we employ the generated soft labels as supervisory information to facilitate our implementation of supervised contrastive learning. This expansion of contrastive learning ensures the integrity of the supervisory information while effectively enhancing the learning process. In addition, samples sharing the same soft labels are treated as positive sample pairs, while those with different soft labels are considered to be negative sample pairs. With this strategy, the representations from neural networks keep the local discrimination in one mini-batch. Besides, we also employ a prototype contrastive learning technique to ensure global discrimination. Our S cl ^2 has demonstrated excellent performance on numerous benchmark datasets, showcasing its effectiveness in various standardized evaluation scenarios. Additionally, our model has proven to be highly valuable when applied to real-world noisy datasets.

How Weakly Supervised Information helps Contrastive Learning

Rethinking Weak Supervision in Helping Contrastive Learning

Understanding Difficult-to-learn Examples in Contrastive Learning: A Theoretical Framework for Spectral Contrastive Learning

Is Self-Supervised Learning More Robust Than Supervised Learning?

A Comprehensive Survey on Contrastive Learning

A Brief Introduction to Weakly Supervised Learning

Towards the Generalization of Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning

A Probabilistic Contrastive Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning

On the duality between contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learning

Zero-Mean Regularized Spectral Contrastive Learning: Implicitly Mitigating Wrong Connections in Positive-Pair Graphs

Weakly Supervised Learning: What Could It Do and What Could Not?

Semi-supervised Contrastive Learning Using Partial Label Information

Learning the Relation between Similarity Loss and Clustering Loss in Self-Supervised Learning

Unsupervised Sentence Representation Via Contrastive Learning with Mixing Negatives

Contrasting the landscape of contrastive and non-contrastive learning

What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?

Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Loss

Supervised contrastive learning with corrected labels for noisy label learning

Multi-Scale Subgraph Contrastive Learning

Contrastive Learning Is Spectral Clustering On Similarity Graph

Constrained Labeling for Weakly Supervised Learning