Abstract:Deep neural networks have achieved significant success in the artificial intelligence community and various downstream tasks. They encode images or texts into dense feature representations and are supervised by a large amount of labeled data. Due to the expensiveness of high-quality labeled data, a huge number of easy-to-access instances are collected to conduct supervised learning. However, they have not been annotated by experts and thus can contain numerous noisy instances, which will degrade the performance. To learn robust feature representations despite misleading noisy labels, we employ supervised contrastive learning to directly perform supervision in the hidden space, rather than in the prediction space like the prevalent cross-entropy loss function. However, cutting-edge noisy label learning methods with supervised contrastive learning always discard the data considered to be noisy, and thus cannot tolerate high-ratio noisy datasets. Therefore, we propose a novel training strategy named Supervised Contrastive Learning with Corrected Labels (S cl ^2 ) to defend against the attack of noisy labels. S cl ^2 corrects the noisy labels with an empirical small-loss assumption and conducts supervised contrastive learning using these corrected data. Specifically, we employ the generated soft labels as supervisory information to facilitate our implementation of supervised contrastive learning. This expansion of contrastive learning ensures the integrity of the supervisory information while effectively enhancing the learning process. In addition, samples sharing the same soft labels are treated as positive sample pairs, while those with different soft labels are considered to be negative sample pairs. With this strategy, the representations from neural networks keep the local discrimination in one mini-batch. Besides, we also employ a prototype contrastive learning technique to ensure global discrimination. Our S cl ^2 has demonstrated excellent performance on numerous benchmark datasets, showcasing its effectiveness in various standardized evaluation scenarios. Additionally, our model has proven to be highly valuable when applied to real-world noisy datasets.

Rethinking Weak Supervision in Helping Contrastive Learning

How Weakly Supervised Information helps Contrastive Learning

DCS: Debiased Contrastive Learning with Weak Supervision for Time Series Classification

Data Consistency for Weakly Supervised Learning

Constrained Labeling for Weakly Supervised Learning

A Brief Introduction to Weakly Supervised Learning

Supervised contrastive learning with corrected labels for noisy label learning

Universalizing Weak Supervision

Learning from Incomplete and Inaccurate Supervision

Collaborative Contrastive Refining for Weakly Supervised Person Search.

Semi-supervised Contrastive Learning Using Partial Label Information

Is Self-Supervised Learning More Robust Than Supervised Learning?

On the duality between contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learning

Weakly Supervised Learning: What Could It Do and What Could Not?

Co-Supervised Learning: Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Hierarchical Mixture of Experts

Rethinking Minimal Sufficient Representation in Contrastive Learning

Towards Safe Weakly Supervised Learning

ECLB: Efficient contrastive learning on bi-level for noisy labels

An Inclusive Theoretical Framework of Robust Supervised Contrastive Loss against Label Noise

A Probabilistic Contrastive Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning

Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning of Musical Representations