Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Intercity Cooperation in China ? S City-Regionalization: A Comparative Study of Shenzhen-Hong Kong and Guangzhou-Foshan City Groups
Xianchun Zhang,Jianfa Shen,Xiaoxue Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105339
IF: 7.1
2021-01-01
Land Use Policy
Abstract:Against the backdrop of city-regionalization of Chinese urban jurisdictions, both the integration of urban-rural land-use and the conservation of arable land resources are under unprecedented challenges. It calls for inten-sive and systematic intercity cooperation. To understand the intercity cooperation?s features and mechanisms, this article formulates a three-pronged conceptual framework composed of frequencies of cooperative activities, thematic areas of cooperation, and governance model. Empirically, we carried out a comparative analysis of the cooperation models of Shenzhen-Hong Kong and Guangzhou-Foshan in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area. We have unveiled, two prevalent typologies of China?s intercity cooperation, which are moulded by de facto (shared) geopolitical scale, divergent deepening mechanisms, and concrete politico-economic setting. Specifically, the geographical and administrative scale (level) helps elicit domestic market-induced cooperation and strong state commitments. Situated within different politico-economic settings, a high level of non-state involvements is forged under the confluence of the exported-oriented economy of Shenzhen and the capitalist regime of Hong Kong. In contrast, the Guangzhou-Foshan city group witnesses the ?state-dominated model? under China?s developmental state context. In both cases, local non-state actors? ini-tiatives substantiate the core collaborative practices, while regional planning visions get drafted subsequently by the state bodies. The latter further broadens and intensifies the intercity cooperations.