Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

An RNN-Based Framework for the MILP Problem in Robustness Verification of Neural Networks.

Improving Neural Network Verification through Spurious Region Guided Refinement.

Robustness Verification of Classification Deep Neural Networks Via Linear Programming.

Efficient Global Robustness Certification of Neural Networks via Interleaving Twin-Network Encoding

An Efficient Method to Measure Robustness of ReLU-Based Classifiers via Search Space Pruning

Towards Optimal Branching of Linear and Semidefinite Relaxations for Neural Network Robustness Certification

Attack-Guided Efficient Robustness Verification of ReLU Neural Networks

Improving Robustness Verification of Neural Networks with General Activation Functions Via Branching and Optimization

Tight Neural Network Verification via Semidefinite Relaxations and Linear Reformulations

Efficient Robustness Verification of the Deep Neural Networks for Smart IoT Devices

A Dual Relaxation Method for Neural Network Verification

Efficient verification of neural networks based on neuron branching and LP abstraction

Bound Tightening using Rolling-Horizon Decomposition for Neural Network Verification

kProp: Multi-neuron Relaxation Method for Neural Network Robustness Verification.

Efficient Complete Verification of Neural Networks Via Layerwised Splitting and Refinement

Tight Verification of Probabilistic Robustness in Bayesian Neural Networks

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

Towards General Robustness Verification of MaxPool-based Convolutional Neural Networks via Tightening Linear Approximation

Robustness Verification of Swish Neural Networks Embedded in Autonomous Driving Systems

Eager Falsification for Accelerating Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks

A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networks