Abstract:Abstract Background Mental workload is a critical consideration in complex man–machine systems design. Among various mental workload detection techniques, multimodal detection techniques integrating electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals have attracted considerable attention. However, existing EEG–fNIRS-based mental workload detection methods have certain defects, such as complex signal acquisition channels and low detection accuracy, which restrict their practical application. Methods The signal acquisition configuration was optimized by analyzing the feature importance in mental workload recognition model and a more accurate and convenient EEG–fNIRS-based mental workload detection method was constructed. A classical Multi-Task Attribute Battery (MATB) task was conducted with 20 participating volunteers. Subjective scale data, 64-channel EEG data, and two-channel fNIRS data were collected. Results A higher number of EEG channels correspond to higher detection accuracy. However, there is no obvious improvement in accuracy once the number of EEG channels reaches 26, with a four-level mental workload detection accuracy of 76.25 ± 5.21%. Partial results of physiological analysis verify the results of previous studies, such as that the θ power of EEG and concentration of O 2 Hb in the prefrontal region increase while the concentration of HHb decreases with task difficulty. It was further observed, for the first time, that the energy of each band of EEG signals was significantly different in the occipital lobe region, and the power of $$\beta_{1}$$ β 1 and $$\beta_{2}$$ β 2 bands in the occipital region increased significantly with task difficulty. The changing range and the mean amplitude of O 2 Hb in high-difficulty tasks were significantly higher compared with those in low-difficulty tasks. Conclusions The channel configuration of EEG–fNIRS-based mental workload detection was optimized to 26 EEG channels and two frontal fNIRS channels. A four-level mental workload detection accuracy of 76.25 ± 5.21% was obtained, which is higher than previously reported results. The proposed configuration can promote the application of mental workload detection technology in military, driving, and other complex human–computer interaction systems.

A Portable System of Mental Fatigue Detection and Mitigation based on Physiological Signals.

Ubi-Fatigue: Toward Ubiquitous Fatigue Detection Via Contactless Sensing

Synthesized Quantitative Assessment of Human Mental Fatigue with EEG and HRV

Study on the Change of Physiological Signals During Playing Body-Controlled Games

Physiological Signals Based Fatigue Prediction Model for Motion Sensing Games

An EEG-Based brain informatics application for enhancing music experience

Fatigue Driving Detection and Early Warning System based on EEG Signals

A Practical Application for Quantitative Brain Fatigue Evaluation Based on Machine Learning and Ballistocardiogram

Mental fatigue detection using a wearable commodity device and machine learning

Ubi-Fatigue: Towards Ubiquitous Fatigue Detection via contactless sensing

Research on Music Intervention System Based on Human Physiological Signals

Pre-Service Fatigue Screening for Construction Labor Through Hybrid Kinematic-EEG Signal Processing and Workload Assessments

Sensors and Systems for Monitoring Mental Fatigue: A systematic review

Pre-service Fatigue Screening for Construction Workers Through Wearable EEG-based Signal Spectral Analysis

Design of a Wireless Distributed Real-time Muscle Fatigue Detection System.

Design and Development of Human Fatigue Evaluation Method and Equipment Based on Bayesian Network Classifier

Optimized electroencephalogram and functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based mental workload detection method for practical applications

Automatic Cognitive Fatigue Detection Using Wearable fNIRS and Machine Learning

Data-driven natural computational psychophysiology in class

Hearables: Ear EEG Based Driver Fatigue Detection

Assessing Fatigue with Multimodal Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning