Academic Characteristics of 253 Retraction Papers Related to COVID-19 and Implications

SUN Jinnan,WANG Wei,DING Zuoqi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11946/cjstp.202208150619

2023-01-01

Abstract:[Purposes] This study analyzes the retractions of COVID-19 papers, aiming to provide references for the construction and development of journals in the context of public health emergencies. [Methods] Based on 253 papers associated with COVID-19 in the Retraction Watch database, this study summarized the characteristics of these articles from the perspectives of the number of authors, country distribution, citation, review and retraction period, etc. The reasons for retraction were categorized according to the content of the withdrawal statement and typical cases among them were discussed. [Findings] After excluding papers whose links can not be opened, 243 articles involve 1308 authors from 55 countries, with the largest number of articles retracted from the US. A total of 154 papers are clearly retrieved for online publication and retraction dates, with an average retraction time of 154 days. A total of 86 papers are clearly retrieved for reception and receipt dates, with an average review cycle of 83 days. Except for papers published on the preprint platforms, the remaining 214 papers receive an average of 22.19 citations. The retracted papers have no significant effect on the journal impact factors. More than half of the papers are retracted due to the authors′ own reasons. [Conclusions] The control of the quality of academic papers requires the concerted efforts of the country, journals, and authors. As the main platform for sharing academic achievements, scientific journals need to standardize the retraction process and optimize the review mechanism.