Influence of the conditions of trypsin immobilization onto Spherosil on coupling efficiency

P. Monsan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00515681

1978-03-01

European Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Review of retracted papers in the field of neurology

Xingbo Wang,Ning Gao,Huan Chen,Weiming Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15960

Abstract:Background and purpose: Despite the growing awareness of academic fraud, its prevalence in the field of neurology has not been fully assessed. This review aims to analyze the characteristics of the retracted papers in the field of neurology and the reasons for the retraction to better understand the trends in this area and to assist to avoid retraction incidents. Methods: A total of 79 papers were included, which pertained to 22 countries and 64 journals. The marking methods for retracting original papers included watermarks (89.04%), retracted signs in the text (5.48%) and no prompt (5.48%). The median M (interquartile range [IQR]) of citations in retractions in neurology was 7 (41). Studies continued to be cited after retraction with an M (IQR) of 3 (16). The journal impact factor was between 0 and 157.335, with an M (IQR) of 5.127 (3.668). 45.21% and 31.51% papers were mainly published in the first and second quartile journals, respectively. The M (IQR) time elapsed between publication and retraction was 32 (44) months. The reasons for retraction included two major categories, academic misconduct (79.75%) and academic unintentional mistakes (20.25%). Results and conclusions: The number of retractions in neurology has been on the rise over the past decade, with fabricated academic misconduct being the main cause of the retractions. Due to the long time lag between publication and retraction, a number of unreliable findings continue to be cited following retraction. In addition to the requisite standards of academic ethics, augmenting research training and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial in enhancing research integrity.
A Systematic Review of Retracted Publications in Clinical Orthopaedic Research

Catherine M. Call,Peter C. Michalakes,Andrew D. Lachance,Thomas Zink,Brian J. McGrory

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.085

IF: 4.435

2024-06-08

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Abstract:Background Retracted publications are an often-overlooked issue affecting the scientific community; recent data confirms the overall number of retracted publications is rising While this has previously been looked at within orthopaedic surgery, a contemporary understanding of retractions is required due to the rapid expansion in publications. Our study aimed to assess the retracted publications within clinical orthopaedic research to evaluate for characteristics and trends. Methods A systematic review was conducted on December 14, 2023, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were four databases that were queried to identify retracted publications in clinical orthopaedics that assessed operative and non-operative orthopaedic interventions (excluding basic science). Articles were independently screened by two reviewers; those meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated for various characteristics, including reasons for retraction based on Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines. Results There were 233 studies that met inclusion criteria and were retracted between January 1, 1990, and December 14, 2023. Clinical orthopaedics represented 1.18% of all retracted publications identified through PubMed over this period. There were 87 articles that were retracted in 2023, up from 17 in 2022 (a 412% increase). Retracted studies were published in journals with 2022 impact factors up to 9.3, with an average of 3.1 (SD [standard deviation] 1.9). A total of 39.5% of the retracted studies were published in orthopaedic journals, and 60.9% of the retracted articles were published in exclusively open access journals. The mean time from electronic publication to retraction was 2.1 years (SD 2.2). Retracted articles have been cited up to 180 times (mean 8.6; SD 20). Reasons for retraction included misconduct (45.9%), plagiarism (11.6%), redundant publication (11.6%), unethical research (10.3%), error (9.4%), and others (10.7%). Conclusions The prevalence of retractions in the clinical orthopaedic literature is increasing. Clinical research is the basis for clinical practice guidelines, the gold standard for informing medical decision making. Retractions may be one harbinger of lower-quality publications; researchers, institutions, and journals together play important roles in maintaining scientific integrity.

orthopedics
Prevalence, Characteristics, and Trends in Retracted Spine Literature: 2000-2023

Aman Singh,Mina Botros,Paul Guirguis,Ankit Punreddy,Addisu Mesfin,Varun Puvanesarajah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.080

Abstract:Background: Retraction of scientific publications is an important check on scientific misconduct and serves to maintain the integrity of the scientific literature. The present study aims to examine the prevalence, trends, and characteristics of retracted spine literature across basic science and clinical spine literature. Methods: Multiple databases were queried for retracted papers relating to spine or spine surgery, between January 2000 and May 2023. Of 112,668 publications initially identified, 125 were ultimately included in the present study following screening by 2 independent reviewers. Journal of origin, reasons for retraction, date of publication, date of retraction, impact factor of journal, countries of research origin, and study design were collected for each included publication. Results: Clinical studies were the most frequent type of retracted publication (n = 70). The most common reason for retraction was fraud (n = 58), followed by plagiarism (n = 22), and peer review process manipulation (n = 16). Impact factors ranged from 0.3 to 11.1 with a median of 3.75. Average months from publication to retraction across all studies was 37.5 months. The higher the journal impact factor, the longer the amount of time between publication and retraction (P = 0.01). China (n = 63) was the country of origin of more than half of all retracted spine publications. Conclusions: The rate of retractions has been increasing over the past 23 years, and clinical studies have been the most frequently retracted publication type. Clinicians treating disorders of the spine should be aware of these trends when relying on the clinical literature to inform their practice.
Price Index Convergence Among Indian Cities : A Cointegration Approach

A. M. Morshed,Sung K. Ahn

Abstract:We examine the price dynamics in Indian cities using cointegration analysis. We identify and then calculate a common trend for prices in these 25 cities. We obtain the impulse response functions to calculate the rates of convergence to the prices, and find that the half-life of any shock is very small for Indian cities. Although a close to three-month half-life seems too fast, there are some indications in the literature that half-life can be much smaller. We also analyzed how shock can be transmitted from one city to another and found no systematic behavior of price convergence. JEL Classification Code: F15, E31, C23.
[Study of the Chinese drug shi-hu(Dendrobium). I. Investigation of botanical origin and the drug (author's transl)].

W. Sha,J. Y. Luo

Abstract:
Optimal relocation of excess capacity in optical WDM backbone networks

F. Dikbiyik,M. Tornatore,B. Mukherjee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2012.6503560

2012-12-01

Abstract:Operational networks get gradually upgraded to avoid capacity exhaustion and create resources to handle traffic growth. These upgrades require installation of new physical resources (e.g., line cards) and might be costly to network operators. The additional capital expenditure (CapEx) to upgrade the network can be reduced or eliminated by relocating excess resources which were deployed into the network, but are unused (e.g., due to optimistic forecasts or excessive overprovisioning). We investigate a cost-effective scheme to relocate excess capacity in an optical WDM backbone network to (i) reduce or eliminate upgrade costs, (ii) avoid capacity exhaustion (by migrating resources from underutilized links to overutilized links), and (iii) improve network robustness (by migrating resources from unreliable links to reliable links). We propose a novel generic relocation scheme that network operators can use based on their objectives to determine how to relocate excess resources. We also provide a solution which maximizes various benefits (e.g., network robustness and capacity exhaustion avoidance) of network operators by using game theory for our relocation scheme. Our results show that network operator can save a lot of CapEx while upgrading/improving the network by using our relocation scheme.
Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices

Soo Young Hwang,Dong Keon Yon,Seung Won Lee,Min Seo Kim,Jong Yeob Kim,Lee Smith,Ai Koyanagi,Marco Solmi,Andre F Carvalho,Eunyoung Kim,Jae Il Shin,John P A Ioannidis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e333

2023-10-23

Abstract:Background: Many studies have evaluated the prevalence of different reasons for retraction in samples of retraction notices. We aimed to perform a systematic review of such empirical studies of retraction causes. Methods: The PubMed/MEDLINE database and the Embase database were searched in June 2023. Eligible studies were those containing sufficient data on the reasons for retraction across samples of examined retracted notices. Results: A 11,181 potentially eligible items were identified, and 43 studies of retractions were included in this systematic review. Studies limited to retraction notices of a specific subspecialty or country, journal/publication type are emerging since 2015. We noticed that the reasons for retraction are becoming more specific and more diverse. In a meta-analysis of 17 studies focused on different subspecialties, misconduct was responsible for 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53-67%) of all retractions while error and publication issues contributed to 17% (95% CI, 12-22%) and 9% (95% CI, 6-13%), respectively. The end year of the retraction period in all included studies and the proportion of misconduct presented a weak positive association (coefficient = 1.3% per year, P = 0.002). Conclusion: Misconduct seems to be the most frequently recorded reason for retraction across empirical analyses of retraction notices, but other reasons are not negligible. Greater specificity of causes and standardization is needed in retraction notices.
Retractions in Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences Journals: A Systematic Review

Sinan Kardeş,William Levack,Kağan Özkuk,Ebru Atmaca Aydın,Serap Seringeç Karabulut

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.010

Abstract:Objective: To identify the characteristics of retracted publications in rehabilitation and sport sciences journals. Data sources: The Web of Science, PubMed, and Retraction Watch databases were searched from inception to August 2019. Study selection: Retracted publications published in rehabilitation or sport sciences journals, indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) were included. Data extraction: One author extracted the data. Two other authors checked the data. Data synthesis: A total of 37 and 52 retracted publications and their retraction notices were identified for rehabilitation and sport sciences, respectively. The majority of retracted publications (68% of all retracted papers in rehabilitation and 54% of all retracted papers in sport sciences) were published in the past decade. Retracted publications in rehabilitation and sport sciences were published in 21 and 22 different journals and originated from 18 and 21 different countries, respectively. The full-text of the retracted publications was available with a retraction watermark or note for 59% of cases in rehabilitation and 58% in sport sciences. The reasons for the retractions were more often attributed to misconduct (79% and 61%) than to honest error (21% and 39%) in rehabilitation and sport sciences, respectively. However, a reason was not stated for 15% of the publications. The median time interval between publication and retraction was 622 days in rehabilitation and 607 days in sport sciences publications. Conclusions: The total number of retracted publications in rehabilitation and sport sciences journals was small. The retracted publications have been published in a variety of rehabilitation and sport sciences journals and came from different countries across the world. Several retracted publications and retraction notices failed to adhere to The Committee on Publication Ethics guidelines in the handling of full-text (retain with a watermark or note) or stating the underlying reasons for the retraction.
Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study

Evelyne Decullier,Laure Huot,Géraldine Samson,Hervé Maisonneuve

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-238

2013-06-19

Abstract:Background: Retraction in Medline medical literature experienced a tenfold increase between 1999 and 2009, however retraction remains a rare event since it represents 0.02% of publications. Retractions used to be handled following informal practices until they were formalized in 2009 by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The objective of our study was to describe the compliance to these guidelines. Methods: All retractions published in 2008 were identified using the Medline publication type "retraction of publication". The notices of retraction and the original articles were retrieved. For each retraction, we identified the reason for retraction, the country of affiliation of the first author, the time to retraction, the impact factor of the journal and the mention of retraction on the original article. Results: Overall, 244 retractions were considered for analysis. Formal retraction notices could not be retrieved for 9. Of the 235 retractions available (96%), the reason was not detailed for 21 articles (9%). The most cited reasons were mistakes (28%), plagiarism (20%), fraud (14%) and overlap (11%). The original paper or its location was found for 233 retractions (95%). Of these, 22% were available with no mention of the retraction. Conclusion: A standard retraction form could be helpful, with a check list of major reason, leaving the editor free to provide the reader with any further information. Original articles should remain available with a clear mention of the retraction.
Analysis of the retraction papers in oncology field from Chinese scholars from 2013 to 2022

Wenyan Yang,Na Sun,Hongwei Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1627_23

2024-04-01

Abstract:Objective: To analyze the characteristics of retracted oncology papers from Chinese scholars and the reasons for retraction. Methods: Data on retracted oncology papers from Chinese scholars published from 2013 to 2022 were retrieved from the Retraction Watch database. The retraction number and annual distribution, article types, reasons for retraction, retraction time delay, publishers, and journal characteristics of the retracted papers were analyzed. Results: A total of 2695 oncology papers from Chinese scholars published from 2013 to 2022 had been retracted. The majority of these papers were published from 2017 to 2020. In terms of article type, 2538 of the retracted papers were research articles, accounting for 94.17% of the total number of retracted papers. The main reasons for retraction were data, result, and image problems, duplicate publication, paper mills, author- and third-party-related reasons, plagiarism, false reviews, and method errors. The retraction time delay for the retracted papers ranged from 0 to 3582 days (median, 826 days). The retractions mainly occurred within the first 4 years after publication. A total of 77 publishers were involved in the retracted papers. In terms of journal distribution, 394 journals were involved in the retracted papers, of which 368 (93.40%) were included in the SCI database. There were 243 journals with an impact factor of <5 (66.03%). Conclusion: In the field of oncology, the annual distribution of retracted papers from Chinese scholars exhibited first an increasing and subsequently a decreasing trend, reaching a peak in 2019, indicating an improvement in the status of retraction after 2021. The main type of the retracted papers was research article, and the main reason for retraction was academic misconduct. The retractions were mainly concentrated in several major publishers and periodicals in Europe and the United States. Most of the journals had low-impact factors.
An analysis of retracted papers in Computer Science

Martin Shepperd,Leila Yousefi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285383

2022-06-14

Abstract:Context: The retraction of research papers, for whatever reason, is a growing phenomenon. However, although retracted paper information is publicly available via publishers, it is somewhat distributed and inconsistent. Objective: The aim is to assess: (i) the extent and nature of retracted research in Computer Science (CS) (ii) the post-retraction citation behaviour of retracted works and (iii) the potential impact on systematic reviews and mapping studies. Method: We analyse the Retraction Watch database and take citation information from the Web of Science and Google scholar. Results: We find that of the 33,955 entries in the Retraction watch database (16 May 2022), 2,816 are classified as CS, i.e., approximately 8.3%. For CS, 56% of retracted papers, provide little or no information as to the reasons. This contrasts with 26% for other disciplines. There is also a remarkable disparity between different publishers, a tendency for multiple versions of a retracted paper over and above the Version of Record (VoR), and for new citations long after a paper is officially retracted. Conclusions: Unfortunately retraction seems to be a sufficiently common outcome for a scientific paper that we as a research community need to take it more seriously, e.g., standardising procedures and taxonomies across publishers and the provision of appropriate research tools. Finally, we recommend particular caution when undertaking secondary analyses and meta-analyses which are at risk of becoming contaminated by these problem primary studies.

Information Retrieval
Fixed Point Theorems for Hybrid Rational Geraghty Contractive Mappings in Ordered b-Metric Spaces

F. Zabihi,A. Razani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/929821

2014-04-24

Journal of Applied Mathematics

Abstract:We introduce the new notion of a hybrid rational Geraghty contractive mapping and investigate the existence of fixed point and coincidence point for such mappings in ordered -metric spaces. We also provide an example to illustrate the results presented herein. Finally, we establish an existence theorem for a solution of an integral equation.
Red Cell Sorbitol Levels During Hyper and Hypoglycaemic Clamp Studies in Insulin‐dependent Diabetic Patients

D. Price,P. Grant,C. Airey,M. Stickland,J. Kemp,J. Wales

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1987.tb00868.x

IF: 3.5

1987-05-06

Diabetic Medicine

Abstract:The red cell sorbitol concentration has been suggested as a measure of polyol pathway activity. Red cell sorbitol levels were higher in 53 patients having insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) than in 16 control subjects. Six patients having IDDM underwent hyperglycaemic ‘clamp’ studies; the red cell sorbitol level returned to the normal range when the blood glucose was clamped at 5 mmol/l for 1 h and rapidly increased when it was clamped at 15 and 25 mmol/l for a further hour at each level. Seven patients with IDDM were rendered hypoglycaemic; red cell sorbitol levels rapidly fell to a level less than, but not significantly different from normal.
Penicillin-binding protein 2x of Streptococcus pneumoniae: enzymic activities and interactions with beta-lactams.

Marc Jamin,Christian Damblon,Christian Damblon,S. Millier,S. Millier,R. Hakenbeck,R. Hakenbeck,J. Frère,J. Frère

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ2920735

IF: 3.766

1993-06-15

Biochemical Journal

Abstract:The high-molecular-mass penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 2x, one of the primary targets of beta-lactam antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae, has been produced as a soluble form and purified in large amounts. It has been shown to catalyse hydrolysis and transfer reactions with different ester and thiolester substrates and its catalytic behaviour was often similar to that of the soluble DD-peptidase from Streptomyces R61. This provided an easy method to monitor the activity of the PBP. For the first time, a reliable kinetic study of the interaction between a lethal target and beta-lactam antibiotics has been performed. Characteristic kinetic parameters were obtained with different beta-lactam compounds. These results not only validated the mechanism established with non-essential extracellular enzymes, but will also constitute the basis for comparative studies of the low-affinity variants from penicillin-resistant strains.
Inappropriate Citation of Retracted Articles in Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Publications

Alessandro De Cassai,Federico Geraldini,Silvia De Pinto,Ilaria Carbonari,Marco Cascella,Annalisa Boscolo,Nicolò Sella,Francesco Monteleone,Fabio Cavaliere,Marina Munari,Eugenio Garofalo,Paolo Navalesi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000004302

IF: 8.986

2022-07-05

Anesthesiology

Abstract:Background Retracted articles represent research withdrawn from the existing body of literature after publication. Research articles may be retracted for several reasons ranging from honest errors to intentional misconduct. They should not be used as reliable sources, and it is unclear why they are cited occasionally by other articles. This study hypothesized that several mechanisms may contribute to citing retracted literature and aimed to analyze the characteristics of articles citing retracted literature in anesthesiology and critical care. Methods Using the Retraction Watch database, we retrieved retracted articles on anesthesiology and intensive care medicine up to August 16, 2021, and identified the papers citing these retracted articles. A survey designed to investigate the reasons for citing these articles was sent to the corresponding authors of the citing papers. Results We identified 478 retracted articles, 220 (46%) of which were cited at least once. We contacted 1297 corresponding authors of the papers that cited these articles, 417 (30%) of whom responded to our survey and were included in the final analysis. The median number of authors in the analyzed articles was five, and the median elapsed time from retraction to citation was 3 yr. Most of the corresponding authors (372, 89%) were unaware of the retracted status of the cited article, mainly because of inadequate notification of the retraction status in journals and/or databases and the use of stored copies. Conclusions The corresponding authors were generally unaware of the retraction of the cited article, usually because of inadequate identification of the retracted status in journals and/or web databases and the use of stored copies. Awareness of this phenomenon and rigorous control of the cited references before submitting a paper are of fundamental importance in research. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

anesthesiology
New procedure for direct bioautographic TLC assay as applied to a tincture of Ranunculus bulbosus.

N. Didry,L. Dubreuil,M. Pinkas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8741(90)90039-V

IF: 5.195

1990-07-01

Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Abstract:
Collaboration and Its Influence on Retraction Based on Retracted Publications During 1978–2017

Zhang Qin,Abraham Juneman,Fu Hui-Zhen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03636-w

2020-01-01

Abstract:Scientific collaboration has considerably grown in recent years, and has been recognized as a positive factor for research productivity and quality. This study is aimed at exploring the collaboration in retracted publications and the influence on different kinds of scientific misbehaviors based on 4842 retracted publications in Web of Science Core Collection from 1978 to 2017. Search results showed that the proportion of international collaborations in retracted publications has fluctuated at around 20% in the past 17 years, and different collaboration patterns of major countries are revealed. The USA and China contributed to more than half of all retracted publications, while retraction rate of Chinese papers was three times higher compared to papers from the USA. A negative correlation between the proportion of internationally collaborative publications and the retraction rate was found. Countries involved in more international collaborations tend to have lower retraction rates. Also, the occurrences of plagiarism was found to be lower when a paper is contributed by more authors, while falsification or manipulation, errors or unreliable results appeared more frequently under the same condition. Conclusions are made with a focus on the need for more actions to strengthen the scientific norms and integrity within collaborative groups.
[Effect of metoprolol on the expression of GRK2 in lymphocyte of advanced elderly patients with chronic heart failure].

Wen-qian Gao,Chun-guang Han,Yue-xiang Zhao,Qiong Wang,P. Zhu,Ting-shu Yang,Yong-xue Liu

2010-05-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of metoprolol on the expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinases 2 (GRK2) in lymphocyte of advanced elderly patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS 32 elderly patients with chronic heart failure were divided into control group and metoprolol group, 16 each. Conventional therapy was used in the control group, conventional therapy plua metoprolol was used in metoprolol group. The treatment courses were 8 weeks in both groups. RESULTS Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction were not different between the two groups. Lymphocyte GRK2 mRNA level in metoprolol group was lower than that in control group. CONCLUSION Metoprolol can inhibit the expression of GRK2 in lymphocyte of advanced elderly patients with chronic heart failure.
Patterns of retractions from 1981-2020 : Does a fraud lead to another fraud?

Kiran Sharma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.13091

2020-11-26

Digital Libraries

Abstract:Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications and this database reveals the disturbing trend in science~\citep{fang2012misconduct, brainard2018massive}. The objective of the study is to find the association among the authors' collaboration, the number of retracted papers, the number of retracted citations, journal impact factor, and research areas. We present a detailed analysis of 12231 research papers indexed by Web of Science (WoS) as retracted publications from 1981-2020. The study demonstrates the collaboration patterns of retracted publications where 61.5% of authors have only one and 24.6% have two retracted papers; however, 2% of authors have more than 10 retracted papers. To study the impact of citing retracted papers, we investigated the retracted papers with citations. The study reveals that 55.2% of retracted papers have been cited at least once, where 25.4% of papers are such papers where at least one citation turned out to be a retraction. This shows the impact of scientific misconduct or fraud on new research. The number of retractions is independent of the journal impact factor and as compared to high impact papers, low impact papers are attracting more citations. We also investigate the citations received by retracted papers published in higher as well as lower impact factor journals. 1/4th of the papers are retracted citations that cited the retracted papers; however, there is no significant relationship exists between the higher impact or lower impact journals with retractions or citations. Finally, how the average team size and average retracted citations vary among different research areas are studied. The study provides an insight that how a fraud leads to another fraud in the scientific world. Also, the rising trend of citations of retracted papers is a serious concern.
Retracted papers by Iranian authors: Causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations

Ali Ghorbi,Mohsen Fazeli-Varzaneh,Erfan Ghaderi-Azad,Marcel Ausloos,Marcin Kozak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04104-9

2021-08-29

Abstract:This study aims to analyze 343 retraction notices indexed in the Scopus database, published in 2001-2019, related to scientific articles (co-)written by at least one author affiliated with an Iranian institution. In order to determine reasons for retractions, we merged this database with the database from Retraction Watch. The data were analyzed using Excel 2016 and IBM-SPSS version 24.0, and visualized using VOSviewer software. Most of the retractions were due to fake peer review (95 retractions) and plagiarism (90). The average time between a publication and its retraction was 591 days. The maximum time-lag (about 3,000 days) occurred for papers retracted due to duplicate publications; the minimum time-lag (fewer than 100 days) was for papers retracted due to ''unspecified cause'' (most of these were conference papers). As many as 48 (14%) of the retracted papers were published in two medical journals: Tumor Biology (25 papers) and Diagnostic Pathology (23 papers). From the institutional point of view, Islamic Azad University was the inglorious leader, contributing to over one-half (53.1%) of retracted papers. Among the 343 retraction notices, 64 papers pertained to international collaborations with researchers from mainly Asian and European countries; Malaysia having the most retractions (22 papers). Since most retractions were due to fake peer review and plagiarism, the peer review system appears to be a weak point of the submission/publication process; if improved, the number of retractions would likely drop because of increased editorial control.

Digital Libraries,Physics and Society

Influence of the conditions of trypsin immobilization onto Spherosil on coupling efficiency

Review of retracted papers in the field of neurology

A Systematic Review of Retracted Publications in Clinical Orthopaedic Research

Prevalence, Characteristics, and Trends in Retracted Spine Literature: 2000-2023

Price Index Convergence Among Indian Cities : A Cointegration Approach

[Study of the Chinese drug shi-hu(Dendrobium). I. Investigation of botanical origin and the drug (author's transl)].

Optimal relocation of excess capacity in optical WDM backbone networks

Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices

Retractions in Rehabilitation and Sport Sciences Journals: A Systematic Review

Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study

Analysis of the retraction papers in oncology field from Chinese scholars from 2013 to 2022

An analysis of retracted papers in Computer Science

Fixed Point Theorems for Hybrid Rational Geraghty Contractive Mappings in Ordered b-Metric Spaces

Red Cell Sorbitol Levels During Hyper and Hypoglycaemic Clamp Studies in Insulin‐dependent Diabetic Patients

Penicillin-binding protein 2x of Streptococcus pneumoniae: enzymic activities and interactions with beta-lactams.

Inappropriate Citation of Retracted Articles in Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Publications

New procedure for direct bioautographic TLC assay as applied to a tincture of Ranunculus bulbosus.

Collaboration and Its Influence on Retraction Based on Retracted Publications During 1978–2017

[Effect of metoprolol on the expression of GRK2 in lymphocyte of advanced elderly patients with chronic heart failure].

Patterns of retractions from 1981-2020 : Does a fraud lead to another fraud?

Retracted papers by Iranian authors: Causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations