Somatostatin Versus Octreotide for Prevention of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: The PREFIPS Randomized Clinical Trial: A FRENCH 007-ACHBT Study
Sébastien Gaujoux,Jean-Marc Regimbeau,Guillaume Piessen,Stéphanie Truant,Frantz Foissac,Louise Barbier,Emmanuel Buc,Mustapha Adham,David Fuks,Sophie Deguelte,Fabrice Muscari,Laurent Sulpice,Jean-Christophe Vaillant,Lilian Schwarz,Antonio Sa Cunha,Milena Muzzolini,Bertrand Dousset,Alain Sauvanet,Collaborators,Hendy Abdoul,Olivier Antomarchi,Marc Boudon,Pr Nicolas Carrere,François Cauchy,Alexandre Chebaro,Daniel Cherqui,Thibault Crombe,Emmanuel Cuellar,Ariane D'avout,Charles de Ponthaud,Clément Dubois,Pr Isabelle Durand-Zaleski,Safi Dokmak,Mehdi El Amrani,Johan Gagniere,Anne Gandon,Brice Gayet,Elisabeth Hain,Florence Jeune,Vahan Kepenekian,Mahaut Leconte,Bertrand Leroy,Lena M'ba,Alexandru Mare,Frédéric Marques,Pierre-Philippe Massault,Alexandre Mensier,Guillaume Millet,Julie Navez,Julie Perinel,Elise Pelascani,Denis Pezet,Tullio Piardi,Gabriella Pittau,Mathieu Prodeau,Yohann Renard,Géraldine Rousseau,Anne-Sophie Schneck,Pr Karem Slim,Bertrand Suc,Nicolas Tabchouri,Boris Trechot,Ecoline Tribillon,Candice Tubbax,Pr Jean-Jacques Tuech,Stylianos Tzedakis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006313
2024-08-01
Abstract:Objective: Pharmacological prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatectomy is open to debate. The present study compares clinically significant POPF rates in patients randomized between somatostatin versus octreotide as prophylactic treatment. Methods: Multicentric randomized controlled open study in patient's candidate for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) comparing somatostatin continuous intravenous infusion for 7 days versus octreotid 100 μg, every 8 hours subcutaneous injection for 7 days, stratified by procedure (PD vs DP) and size of the main pancreatic duct (>4 mm) on grade B/C POPF rates at 90 days based on an intention-to-treat analysis. Results: Of 763 eligible patients, 651 were randomized: 327 in the octreotide arm and 324 in the somatostatin arm, with comparable the stratification criteria - type of surgery and main pancreatic duct dilatation. Most patients had PD (n=480; 73.8%), on soft/normal pancreas (n=367; 63.2%) with a nondilated main pancreatic duct (n=472; 72.5%), most often for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n=311; 47.8%). Almost all patients had abdominal drainage (n=621; 96.1%) and 121 (19.5%) left the hospital with the drain in place (median length of stay=16 days). A total of 153 patients (23.5%) developed a grade B/C POPF with no difference between both groups: 24.1%: somatostatin arm and 22.9%: octreotide arm (χ 2 test, P =0.73, ITT analysis). Absence of statistically significant difference persisted after adjustment for stratification variables and in per-protocol analysis. Conclusion: Continuous intravenous somatostatin is not statistically different from subcutaneous octreotide in the prevention of grade B/C POPF after pancreatectomy. Findings: In the PREFIPS Randomized Clinical Trial including 651 patients, a total of 153 patients (23.5%) developed a grade B/C POPF with no significant difference between both groups: 24.1%: somatostatin arm and 22.9%: octreotide arm (χ 2 test, P =0.73, ITT analysis). Absence of statistically significant difference persisted after adjustment for stratification variables and in per-protocol analysis.