Mechanism and Effect Assessment of Sub-Atmospheric Pressure and Co-Flow Air to Suppress the Flicker of Buoyancy-Driven Methane Laminar Diffusion Flame

Xiao Yang,Shijiu Ma,Jianmin Gao,Qian Du,Yu Zhang,Heming Dong,Shaohua Wu,Yukun Qin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107649
IF: 8.129
2023-01-01
Fuel Processing Technology
Abstract:To further reduce the combustion instability behavior in high-altitude areas, a synergistic suppression of buoyancy-driven methane laminar diffusion flame flicker was achieved by sub-atmospheric pressure combined with co-flow air, and the suppression mechanism was revealed through the schlieren technique. As the pressure decreases, the fluid density gradient within the shear layer decreases, slowing down the formation of vortices. When the co-flow air increases, the vortex is accelerated to rise until the vortex forms downstream of the flame and the flame flicker is completely suppressed. The suppression of flame flicker by sub-atmospheric pressure and co-flow air was nonlinear. The flicker frequency, oscillation amplitude, and flame mean height of flames were assessed for a pressure of 0.5-1.0 atm and co-flow air of 4-16 L/min. The sub-atmospheric pressure reduces the flicker frequency, which increases with increasing co-flow air. The reduction rate of oscillation amplitude at sub- atmospheric pressure varied among different co-flow air flow rates. The initial and that almost realize flame stabilization co-flow air flow rates are more effective than the intermediate flow rate in reducing the oscillation amplitude. The flame mean height decreases monotonically with decreasing pressure, but there is a small peak in the downward trend with increasing co-flow air
What problem does this paper attempt to address?