Research on R&D Patterns Selection of MNEs When Parent Is Non-monopoly
Liuqing YANG,Qiaozhuan LIANG,Wenguang ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2017.02.005
2017-01-01
Journal of Management Science
Abstract:Recently, knowledge has been becoming more and more important for the development of enterprises, while MNEs are developing dramatically all over the world.A serious challenge faced by MNEs is how they obtain different knowledge from different areas and use the knowledge effectively in their operations.Therefore, how MNEs choose R&D patterns is attracting more and more attention.In realistic practice, monopolistic MNEs becomes fewer and fewer due to the fierce competition.Aiming at R&D patterns selection of MNEs, we establish a model including parent, subsidiary and their competitors with game theory when the parent is not a monopolist, and analyze equilibrium quantities and equilibrium profits of MNEs in the case of R&D centralization and those in the case of R&D decentralization using the model respectively.Our model is based on Cournot model, which is a classic game model usually used to analyze quantity competition.We focus the impact of R&D pattern to MNEs' profits in our model that contains the proportion of knowledge of parent's competitor transferring to the parent, the proportion of knowledge of parent transferring to the subsidiary, product substituting rate in the market where subsidiary operations and the proportion of knowledge of the subsidiary transferring to its competitor.We use MAPLE to resolve our model, because handwork of resolution of our model is quite time-consuming.After finishing resolving our model, we obtain sufficient conditions for MNEs to select R&D pattern when the parent is not a monopolist by comparing equilibrium quantities and equilibrium profits.The analysis outcomes of our model indicate that the proportion of knowledge of parent's competitor transferring to the parent, the proportion of knowledge of parent transferring to the subsidiary, product substituting rate in the market where subsidiary operations and the proportion of knowledge of the subsidiary transferring to its competitor have positive impacts to R&D centralization, and have negative impacts to R&D decentralization;product substituting rate in the market where parent operations, the proportion of knowledge of parent transferring to its competitor, the proportion of knowledge of subsidiary's competitor transferring to the subsidiary and the proportion of knowledge of subsidiary transferring to parent have negative impacts to R&D centralization, and have positive impacts to R&D decentralization.The research outcomes mean the advantages both R&D centralization and R&D decentralization are impacted by knowledge elements and market elements.There is not the best R&D pattern for MNEs when parent is not a monopolist all over the world, but there is a suitable R&D pattern for a MNE when its parent is not a monopolist.This research can provide guidance for MNEs to select suitable R&D pattern.