Hydrogen bond strengths in microhydrated clusters of HNO and HONO: Energetic insights via molecular tailoring approach

P. K. Sajith,Thufail M. Ismail,Deepak Patkar,Milind M. Deshmukh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4nj02163k
IF: 3.3
2024-05-31
New Journal of Chemistry
Abstract:The strengths of various types of individual hydrogen bonds (HBs) present in microhydrated clusters of HNO and HONO, i.e., HNO(H2O)n and HONO(H2O)n (n = 1– 4), were examined with the help of the molecular tailoring approach-based (MTA-based) method at the MP2/augcc-pVTZ//MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. The calculated binding energies (EBE) falls in a broader range for the HONO(H2O)n complexes (from −2.32 to −38.52 kcal/mol) than for the HNO(H2O)n complexes (from −2.93 to −34.49 kcal/mol). The HBs involving HONO as the proton donor (HB energy falls between 7.88 and 15.08 kcal/mol) are stronger than that of HNO as the proton donor (HB energy falls between 3.11 and 7.24 kcal/mol). This may be attributed to the stronger acidity of the proton present in HONO. Among various HNO(H2O)n and HONO(H2O)n complexes, the strongest HB (energy = 15.08 kcal/mol) was found in one of the isomers of HONO(H2O)4. The most distinctive feature of HBs of HONO compared to HNO is its greater energy and cooperativity contribution when it interacts with water as HB donor. On the other hand, the -N=O moiety of HNO is a stronger HB acceptor than that of HONO in their monohydrate complexes, but this trend is not observed in the higher clusters because of the greater cooperative contribution found in HONO. Furthermore, in HNO(H2O)n complexes, the self-associative interaction between water molecules is preferred in larger clusters (n = 4). Whereas, cross-associative interactions between HONO and water are dominant along with the water...water interactions for all HONO(H2O)n=1-4 complexes leading to the formation of most stable cyclic cluster.
chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?