Abstract:Overconfidence behavior, one form of positive illusion, has drawn considerable attention throughout history because it is viewed as the main reason for many crises. Investors' overconfidence, which can be observed as overtrading following positive returns, may lead to inefficiencies in stock markets. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the presence of investor overconfidence by employing an artificial intelligence technique and a nonlinear approach to impulse responses to analyze the impact of different return regimes on the overconfidence attitude. We examine whether investors in an emerging stock market (Borsa Istanbul) exhibit overconfidence behavior using a feed-forward, neural network, nonlinear Granger causality test and nonlinear impulse-response functions based on local projections. These are the first applications in the relevant literature due to the novelty of these models in forecasting high-dimensional, multivariate time series. The results obtained from distinguishing between the different market regimes to analyze the responses of trading volume to return shocks contradict those in the literature, which is the key contribution of the study. The empirical findings imply that overconfidence behavior exhibits asymmetries in different return regimes and is persistent during the 20-day forecasting horizon. Overconfidence is more persistent in the low- than in the high-return regime. In the negative interest-rate period, a high-return regime induces overconfidence behavior, whereas in the positive interest-rate period, a low-return regime induces overconfidence behavior. Based on the empirical findings, investors should be aware that portfolio gains may result in losses depending on aggressive and excessive trading strategies, particularly in low-return regimes.

Learning to Be Overconfident and Underconfident

Biased Learning Creates Overconfidence

Dynamic Variety of the Returns and Risk of Investment Fund under the Condition of Overconfidence

The Study on Overconfidence and Overtrading of Chinese Individual Investors

Overconfident Competing Newsvendors

Ambiguity Vs Risk: an Experimental Study of Overconfidence, Gender and Trading Activity

Overconfidence, financial literacy and excessive trading

The Overconfident, or the More Informed?

Overconfidence, Public Disclosure and Long-Lived Information

The Effects of Overconfidence on the Index of Discrimination Ability and the Judgment Criterion in Investment Decision an Experiment Based on Signal Detection Theory

Losing by Learning? A Study of Social Trading Platform

Irrational confidence, imperfect and long-lived information

Which return regime induces overconfidence behavior? Artificial intelligence and a nonlinear approach

The Evolution of Overconfidence

Under- and Over-Reaction from Relative and Aggregate Overconfidence

Conditional Estimates of Diffusion Processes for Evaluating the Positive Feedback Trading

On the Impacts of Overconfidence under Information Diversity

Concentrated Trading and the Survival of Overconfident Traders

Impact of heterogeneous Confidences on investment Style

Rationally misplaced confidence

Effect of Overconfidence on Cournot Competition in the Presence of Yield Uncertainty