Reconnaissance on the Constraint of Rock Magnetic Fabrics on the Reliability of Remanent Magnetization: A Case Study for Mesozoic Detrital Rocks from the Indochian Block and Red Beds from the Shexing Formation of the Linzhou Basin, Lhasa

Jia ShuFei,Huang BaoChun,Lu HongLiang,Zhao Qian,Yan YongGang,Liang YaLun,Yi ZhiYu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2022p0990

2023-01-01

Abstract:The magnetic fabrics is widely used to determine whether remanent magnetization vector recorded in the rock is significantly affected by tectonic stress because it can provide information such as the shape and arrangement of magnetic mineral crystals; however, whether the conventional anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) can accurately define the stability of remanence preserved in the rock has not been studied thoroughly. Accordingly, we conduct a combined AMS and anisotropy of remanent magnetization study on three sets of clastic rock samples from Mesozoic Nam Phong, Phu Kradung and Phra Wihan formations in the Nakhon Thai Basin of the Indochina Block and the red bed samples of the Shixing Formation from the Linzhou Basin of the Lhasa Terrane. The AMS analyses of the majority of the samples of the Nam Phong Formation and all the samples of the Phu Kradung Formation show pencil structure to strong cleavage transitional deformational fabrics. However, the anisotropy of high-field isothermal remanent magnetization (hf-AIR) shows that the magnetic fabrics of characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM), carried by high coercivity hematite, still appears in typical sedimentary fabrics. This indicates that the ChRM has not been significantly biased by syn-depositional and/or post-depositional tectonic stress, and then can still accurately record paleo-direction of the geomagnetic field during formation of the rocks. On the other hand, it is found that only the anisotropy of remanent magnetization is the sufficient and necessary conditions to determine whether the ChRM of the clastic rocks has been affected by syn-depositional and/or post-depositional tectonic stresses. That is to say, if the magnetic fabrics of remanent magnetization, such as the hf-AIR fabrics of the clastic rock with hematite as the main magnetic carrying mineral, indicates that its original sedimentary fabrics has been significantly superimposed or replaced by the deformational fabrics, it must indicate that the ChRM direction has been significantly deflected by the tectonic stress, and therefore cannot be directly used for the kinematics of plates or blocks such as tectonic evolution and paleogeographic reconstruction.