Inverse magnetic fabric of remagnetized limestones in the Zaduo area, Eastern Qiangtang Terrane: Implications for oroclinal bending in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis
Qiang Fu,Maodu Yan,Mark J. Dekkers,Bingshuai Li,Chong Guan,Liang Yu,Wanlong Xu,Miaomiao Shen,Zunbo Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.230175
IF: 3.66
2023-12-16
Tectonophysics
Abstract:Magnetic fabric analysis is a common technique to assess the strain regime during mountain building processes. Here, we use this approach to evaluate the tectonic evolution of the Tibetan Plateau and the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis by analyzing the limestones of the Jurassic Buqu Formation in the Zaduo area, Eastern Qiangtang Terrane (China). These limestones were chemically remagnetized during the Cenozoic. For a proper assessment, it is relevant to understand how the mineralogy of the remagnetized limestones affects their magnetic fabric and how the magnetic fabric can improve our understanding of the tectonic strain and regional deformation. The role of the authigenic magnetite in the development of the magnetic fabric should thus be explored. Comparison of the bulk susceptibility ( K m ) with various natural and laboratory rock magnetic properties ( K m versus natural remanent magnetization, K m versus saturation isothermal remanent magnetization, and K m versus saturation magnetization) indicates that susceptibility and remanences are both carried by authigenic magnetite. Most of the magnetite grains show axial ratios <1.3:1 according to the Néel diagram, and fall within the single-domain range based on the mass magnetic susceptibility (χ) and DC field-normalized anhysteretic remanent magnetization (χ ARM ) ratio, giving rise to the inverse magnetic fabric observed. Twelve sites (120 specimens) are divided into four groups based on the magnetic fabric and rock magnetic behaviors. Overall, there is a clear trend of decreasing K m , natural remanent magnetization, saturation isothermal remanent magnetization, ferromagnetic percentage and shape parameter from Group I to IV. The K 1 axis of all four groups documents a NNE-SSW oriented compression during remagnetization, contrasting with the Eocene NE-SW compression in the Gongjue area farther east. This different compressional regime likely resulted in different rotations and structural trends surrounding the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis.
geochemistry & geophysics