Abstract:<span>DNA is constantly exposed to a wide variety of exogenous and endogenous agents, and most DNA lesions inhibit DNA synthesis. To cope with such problems during replication, cells have molecular mechanisms to resume DNA synthesis in the presence of DNA lesions, which are known as DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways. The concept of ubiquitination-mediated regulation of DDT pathways in eukaryotes was established via genetic studies in the yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>, in which two branches of the DDT pathway are regulated via ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and homology-dependent repair (HDR), which are stimulated by mono- and polyubiquitination of PCNA, respectively. Over the subsequent nearly two decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms that regulate DDT pathways in other eukaryotes. Importantly, TLS is intrinsically error-prone because of the miscoding nature of most damaged nucleotides and inaccurate replication of undamaged templates by TLS polymerases (pols), whereas HDR is theoretically error-free because the DNA synthesis is thought to be predominantly performed by pol δ, an accurate replicative DNA pol, using the undamaged sister chromatid as its template. Thus, the regulation of the choice between the TLS and HDR pathways is critical to determine the appropriate biological outcomes caused by DNA damage. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the species-specific regulatory mechanisms of PCNA ubiquitination and how cells choose between TLS and HDR. We then provide a hypothetical model for the spatiotemporal regulation of DDT pathways in human cells.</span>

The Anaphase Promoting Complex Impacts Repair Choice by Protecting Ubiquitin Signalling at DNA Damage Sites

The Anaphase Promoting Complex Promotes NHEJ Repair Through Stabilizing Ku80 at DNA Damage Sites.

In my end is my beginning: control of end resection and DSBR pathway ‘choice’ by cyclin-dependent kinases

RAP80-directed Tuning of BRCA1 Homologous Recombination Function at Ionizing Radiation-Induced Nuclear Foci.

Correction: Corrigendum: RNA m 6 A methylation regulates the ultraviolet-induced DNA damage response

A cell cycle-dependent BRCA1–UHRF1 cascade regulates DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice

Histone Ubiquitination Associates With Brca1-Dependent Dna Damage Response

Abstract B011: CDK9-55 guides the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) in choosing the DNA repair pathway by affecting the UFL1 ubiquitination

Control of DNA Damage Bypass by Ubiquitylation of PCNA

Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination

Mitotic chromatin marking governs asymmetric segregation of DNA damage

The Rap80-BRCC36 De-Ubiquitinating Enzyme Complex Antagonizes RNF8-Ubc13-dependent Ubiquitination Events at DNA Double Strand Breaks

Cyclin F-EXO1 axis controls cell cycle-dependent execution of double-strand break repair

Spatiotemporal regulation of PCNA ubiquitination in damage tolerance pathways

A PARP1-BRG1-SIRT1 axis promotes HR repair by reducing nucleosome density at DNA damage sites.

Proteome dynamics at broken replication forks reveal a distinct ATM-directed repair response suppressing DNA double-strand break ubiquitination

An OB-fold complex controls the repair pathways for DNA double-strand breaks

The E3 ubiquitin ligase DTX3L and the deubiquitinase USP28 fine-tune DNA double strand repair through mutual regulation of their protein levels

RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO

Chromatin dynamics and the repair of DNA double strand breaks.

Ubiquitinated-PCNA protects replication forks from DNA2-mediated degradation by regulating Okazaki fragment maturation and chromatin assembly