Abstract:<span>DNA is constantly exposed to a wide variety of exogenous and endogenous agents, and most DNA lesions inhibit DNA synthesis. To cope with such problems during replication, cells have molecular mechanisms to resume DNA synthesis in the presence of DNA lesions, which are known as DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways. The concept of ubiquitination-mediated regulation of DDT pathways in eukaryotes was established via genetic studies in the yeast <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>, in which two branches of the DDT pathway are regulated via ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and homology-dependent repair (HDR), which are stimulated by mono- and polyubiquitination of PCNA, respectively. Over the subsequent nearly two decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms that regulate DDT pathways in other eukaryotes. Importantly, TLS is intrinsically error-prone because of the miscoding nature of most damaged nucleotides and inaccurate replication of undamaged templates by TLS polymerases (pols), whereas HDR is theoretically error-free because the DNA synthesis is thought to be predominantly performed by pol δ, an accurate replicative DNA pol, using the undamaged sister chromatid as its template. Thus, the regulation of the choice between the TLS and HDR pathways is critical to determine the appropriate biological outcomes caused by DNA damage. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the species-specific regulatory mechanisms of PCNA ubiquitination and how cells choose between TLS and HDR. We then provide a hypothetical model for the spatiotemporal regulation of DDT pathways in human cells.</span>

Ubiquitinated-PCNA protects replication forks from DNA2-mediated degradation by regulating Okazaki fragment maturation and chromatin assembly

PCNA unloading is crucial for the bypass of DNA lesions by homologous recombination

PCNA Unloading Is Crucial for the Bypass of DNA Lesions Using Homologous Recombination

Control of DNA Damage Bypass by Ubiquitylation of PCNA

Dual Functions of DNA Replication Forks in Checkpoint Signaling and PCNA Ubiquitination.

DNA-damage tolerance mediated by PCNA*Ub fusions in human cells is dependent on Rev1 but not Polη

Effects of PCNA Stability on the Formation of Mutations

Maneuvers on PCNA Rings during DNA Replication and Repair

Post-Translational Modifications of PCNA in Control of DNA Synthesis and DNA Damage Tolerance-the Implications in Carcinogenesis

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is protected from degradation by forming a complex with MutT Homolog2

Post-translational modifications of proliferating cell nuclear antigen: A key signal integrator for DNA damage response (Review).

Mechanisms of DNA Damage Tolerance: Post-Translational Regulation of PCNA

ATR limits Rad18-mediated PCNA monoubiquitination to preserve replication fork and telomerase-independent telomere stability

PCNA Phosphorylation at Tyrosine211 Inhibits Mismatch Repair at the Initiation Step

PARP1-driven poly-ADP-ribosylation regulates BRCA1 function in homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair.

BRCA2 associates with MCM10 to suppress PRIMPOL-mediated repriming and single-stranded gap formation after DNA damage

Cell type specific suppression of hyper-recombination by human RAD18 is linked to PCNA K164 ubiquitination

Spatiotemporal regulation of PCNA ubiquitination in damage tolerance pathways

USP1-dependent nucleolytic expansion of PRIMPOL-generated nascent DNA strand discontinuities during replication stress

14-3-3ζ reduces DNA damage by interacting with and stabilizing proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO