Abstract:Suppose a discrete-time signal $S(t)$, $0 \leq t < N$, is a superposition of atoms taken from a combined time–frequency dictionary made of spike sequences $1_{\{t = \tau\}}$ and sinusoids $\exp\{2\pi i w t /N)/\sqrt{N}$. Can one recover, from knowledge of $S$ alone, the precise collection of atoms going to make up $S$? Because every discrete-time signal can be represented as a superposition of spikes alone, or as a superposition of sinusoids alone, there is no unique way of writing $S$ as a sum of spikes and sinusoids in general. We prove that if $S$ is representable as a highly sparse superposition of atoms from this time–frequency dictionary, then there is only one such highly sparse representation of $S$, and it can be obtained by solving the convex optimization problem of minimizing the $\ell^1$ norm of the coefficients among all decompositions. Here “highly sparse” means that $N_t + N_w < \sqrt{N}/2$ where $N_t$ is the number of time atoms, $N_w$ is the number of frequency atoms, and $N$ is the length of the discrete-time signal. Underlying this result is a general $\ell^1$ uncertainty principle which says that if two bases are mutually incoherent, no nonzero signal can have a sparse representation in both bases simultaneously. For the above setting, the bases are sinuosids and spikes, and mutual incoherence is measured in terms of the largest inner product between different basis elements. The uncertainty principle holds for a variety of interesting basis pairs, not just sinusoids and spikes. The results have idealized applications to band-limited approximation with gross errors, to error-correcting encryption, and to separation of uncoordinated sources. Related phenomena hold for functions of a real variable, with basis pairs such as sinusoids and wavelets, and for functions of two variables, with basis pairs such as wavelets and ridgelets. In these settings, if a function $f$ is representable by a sufficiently sparse superposition of terms taken from both bases, then there is only one such sparse representation; it may be obtained by minimum $\ell^1$ norm atomic decomposition. The condition “sufficiently sparse” becomes a multiscale condition; for example, that the number of wavelets at level $j$ plus the number of sinusoids in the $j$th dyadic frequency band are together less than a constant times $2^{j/2}$.

Tsallis entropy based uncertainty relations on sparse representation for vector and matrix signals

Entropic Uncertainty Inequalities on Sparse Representation

An Open Problem on Sparse Representations in Unions of Bases

Uncertainty Regions of Observables and State-Independent Uncertainty Relations

Strong entropic uncertainty relations for multiple measurements

Uncertainty Principles on Finite Abelian Groups, Restriction Theory, and Applications to Sparse Signal Recovery

On the exact variance of Tsallis entropy in a random pure state

A New Bound of Uncertainty Principle for Real Para-Vector Valued Signals

Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition

Tsallis eXtropy

Uncertainty of quantum channels based on symmetrized ρ-absolute variance and modified Wigner-Yanase skew information

Entirety of Quantum Uncertainty and Its Experimental Verification

Uncertainty of quantum channels based on symmetrized \r{ho}-absolute variance and modified Wigner-Yanase skew information

The Uncertainty Relation for Smooth Entropies

Universal Uncertainty Relations

Tsallis entropy of uncertain sets and its application to portfolio allocation

Entropic Uncertainty Relations for General Symmetric Informationally Complete Positive Operator-Valued Measures and Mutually Unbiased Measurements

On spectral outliers of inhomogeneous symmetric random matrices

Near-Optimal Variance-Based Uncertainty Relations

Entropic uncertainty relations in Schwarzschild space-time

Recovery of Signals with Low Density